Gov. Peter Shumlin, Feb. 22, 2012. VTD/Alan Panebaker
Gov. Peter Shumlin, Feb. 22, 2012. VTD/Alan Panebaker

As the House health care reform bill heads to the floor for debate, both sides of the issue framed their strategies Wednesday.

At Gov. Peter Shumlinโ€™s weekly press conference, he and prominent Democrats touted the benefits of H. 559 and the health benefits exchange it will implement.

โ€œI have long advocated that one of the biggest obstacles to job growth in Vermont is the inability of employers to afford the rising cost of health insurance,โ€ Shumlin said. โ€œIt is killing business. This exchange will allow employers to get out of the health care business and allow their employees to get subsidies by buying health insurance in the exchange.โ€

The sticking point of the health care reform bill is its requirement that businesses with fewer than 50 employees and individuals buy health insurance in the exchange. The โ€œexchangeโ€ is a federally mandated online marketplace that will lay out the options for consumers. People who buy health insurance there will be able to access federal subsidies and tax credits to help cover the cost.

The Shumlin administration predicts increased Medicaid funding and federal incentives will bring $300 million to Vermont starting in 2014 when the exchange goes into effect. Nearly 100,000 Vermonters (about one sixth of the stateโ€™s population) and more than 16,000 businesses will be required to purchase health insurance through the exchange.

Since most subsidies in the exchange are for individuals only, the administration proposes that many smaller businesses would prefer to drop health insurance coverage for their employees and send them to the exchange — a proposition that makes some employers who have offered insurance for their employees uneasy.

โ€œWe believe there are many instances where employers may choose to get out of health insurance business for employees,โ€ Shumlin said.

The administration offered a chart outlining the benefits for people enrolling in the exchange. For example, an individual earning $40,000 and paying $600 per month in premiums could save $283 a month with tax subsidies, the administration claims.

Michael Roche, owner of Stowe Tree Experts, joined the governorโ€™s press conference in support of the bill.

Roche has five employees including himself. He said the exchange will help him be more competitive since he will not have to pay for insurance for his employees.

โ€œI have a small accident insurance plan for my staff but itโ€™s not adequate,โ€ Roche said. โ€œI feel their efforts will have direct effects on my employees. I feel my company is the type of company they are trying to help.โ€

House GOP: H.559 “not ready for prime time”

Shortly after the administration touted the benefits of participation in the exchange, Republican leadership announced a plan to make substantive amendments to the House bill.

House Minority Leader Don Turner said his party wants to make sure there are options for health insurance outside the exchange market and provide information on the financing system for Green Mountain Care — the universal health care system the state aims to put into effect in 2017.

Turner released a statement Tuesday on the Vermont GOP website expressing concerns that many lawmakers do not understand the complex piece of legislation that will have widespread effects.

โ€œThe simple truth is that H. 559 is not ready for prime time,โ€ Turnerโ€™s statement reads. โ€œLegislators cannot and should not be asked to vote on this bill until we can better understand how it will impact Vermont employers, Vermont employees, and Vermont families. We simply cannot afford to make mistakes when the health care coverage of thousands of Vermonters is at risk.โ€

Turner said Wednesday that the idea to herd individuals and small businesses into the exchange is a bad strategy. He thinks if people have a choice, they will choose the exchange if it is better than their current insurance.

Don Turner. VTD/Josh Larkin
Don Turner. VTD/Josh Larkin

โ€œBusiness people are smart,โ€ Turner said. โ€œIf the system is robust and it makes sense financially, people will join.โ€

Turner said the Republican caucus hopes to integrate into H, 559 a requirement that the administration move up the financing plan for Green Mountain Care from Jan. 15, 2013, to Sept. 15, 2012 — before the November gubernatorial election.

โ€œThe only opportunity Vermonters are going to have to weigh in on this issue is during the election,โ€ Turner said.

Sen. Randy Brock, R-Franklin, has announced his bid to run for governor against Shumlin, and he said health care will play a major role in his campaign.

Brock introduced a bill in the Senate that would require an early release of the financing plan for Green Mountain Care also. The Shumlin administration has made clear that the exchange is a step toward its goal of universal health care in 2017 when the state can receive a federal waiver.

Brock said he had not studied the House bill, but as a policy matter he thinks the exchange should be optional.

โ€œWe should expand the [insurance] marketplace and use the exchange as it was intended — as a marketplace in which consumers can go and pick things that best fit their needs, and their familyโ€™s and businessโ€™ at prices they can afford,โ€ Brock said.

More options in the health insurance marketplace, Brock said, will drive down prices.

Bill Driscoll, vice president of Associated Industries of Vermont, said mandatory exchange participation raises red flags for his constituents.

Associated Industries represents businesses, primarily in the manufacturing sector. Driscoll said they are concerned about costs.

โ€œI think [the administrationโ€™s] shift in rhetoric toward emphasizing that 50 or under employers should drop insurance indicates that the exchange could be more expensive than their current options,โ€ Driscoll said.

Dropping health insurance for employees raises a number of issues, Driscoll said. For one, multistate companies that provide insurance for employees in other states could be inconsistent. Additionally, he said, while employers with 50 or fewer employees do not face penalties if they drop coverage for their employees, larger businesses will be penalized under the federal Affordable Care Act. This could create problems in 2016, when companies with 51 to 100 employees will be included in the exchange.

Alan Panebaker is a staff writer for VTDigger.org. He covers health care and energy issues. He graduated from the University of Montana School of Journalism in 2005 and cut his teeth reporting for the...

12 replies on “Democrats, Republicans draw battle lines on House health care debate”