Last night, before the Vermont state legislature adjourned, it did an extraordinary thing: it LOWERED both capital gains and estate taxes. Vermont is investing in its own future. Especially in the midst of a revenue crunch, this move makes great economic sense even though it defies conventional political wisdom on a couple of fronts.

Vermont, like most states, is cutting costs in the face of declining tax revenues and the imminent end of federal stimulus dollars. But most states are also raising taxes (see the Associated Press story here). Why not Vermont? There are two good reasons:

1. Weโ€™re already among the most highly taxed populations in the country; we simply donโ€™t have room to raise taxes.
2. In the not-very-long-term weโ€™ll get more revenue by lowering taxes and would simply lose revenue by raising them further.

Suppose you own a business which is losing customers to low-priced competition. Would you raise prices to make up for the revenue youโ€™re not getting from your lost customers? Of course not, youโ€™d just lose more customers and more revenue.

You have to lower your prices to get your customers back; thatโ€™s obvious. But many companies whose products are overpriced also have an inflated cost structure. They can only lower prices if they can also reduce costs. Companies that canโ€™t reduce costs and canโ€™t match their competitorsโ€™ prices go bankrupt (see General Motors except your business probably wonโ€™t get bailed out).

Vermontโ€™s not a business but it does have customers โ€“ the people who pay taxes โ€“ both visitors and permanent residents. A lot of them โ€“ us โ€“ are here because of Vermontโ€™s quality of life. Weโ€™re willing to pay some premium for that; Vermont doesnโ€™t have to be a bargain basement state to attract people. In fact, if we degraded our environment or became a seriously unfriendly place, weโ€™d certainly lose our customers,
But we have become overpriced!

Last year the legislature raised both the capital gains and estate tax. That seemed to put us past a tipping point. Increasingly training for Vermont accountants includes a substantial segment on how to help your clients change their tax residence. People who pay lots of taxes, start businesses, and create jobs are more and more afraid to live here. Theyโ€™re terrified of dying here.

So we reversed much of last yearโ€™s tax increases even as other states โ€“ our competitors โ€“ are being forced to raise taxes. Itโ€™s a small step but a very big change in direction. Eventually tax cuts will bring us more revenue as the tax base grows and makes further cuts in tax rates possible. The national news about Vermont now is that we are reducing taxes to prepare for future success โ€“ a good story for a state with a reputation for high taxes.

But thereโ€™s still the question of costs. If weโ€™re going to continue to reduce the price of state government, we have to bring costs down. Thatโ€™s why Challenges for Change, a program to reduce the cost of state government through structural change, also passed the legislature this year. More on that in my next post.

Pieces contributed by readers and newsmakers. VTDigger strives to publish a variety of views from a broad range of Vermonters.

3 replies on “Evslin: Vermont dares to lower taxes as stimulus funds wane”