Peter Shumlin, file photo

Editor’s note: President of the Vermont Senate Peter Shumlin responded to questions Thursday evening, shortly after the Vermont House amended the Challenges for Change bill to include a provision for a special session on July 22, in the event that the Senate didn’t find a way to close the government reorganization budget gap. The House bill, H.792, passed, 98-43 a little after 6 p.m. Shumlin is a Democratic candidate for governor.

Q. Do you support a special session?

Shumlin: We need to get the peopleโ€™s work done on time to save taxpayersโ€™ money. Iโ€™ve never found that decisions are easier to make when you put them off. So, letโ€™s get the hard decisions made and go home.

Q. So you donโ€™t think they need more time, clearly.

Shumlin: Iโ€™ve never met a Legislature that wouldnโ€™t wish for more time, but Iโ€™ve never known it to be helpful.

Q. Are you confident the Senate will be able to resolve the $18 million thatโ€™s missing?

Shumlin: Letโ€™s give it our best shot, but my view is we have a responsibility to get the work done and we should do it.

Q. Do you have some specific suggestions about how that might be done?

Shumlin: The Speaker (Shap Smith) and I are working together with all the various constituencies to try to do this right. And weโ€™ll continue to do that work.

Q. Are you disappointed with some of the Douglas administrationโ€™s proposals?

Shumlin: I think that at this point in the session, itโ€™s unfortunate that they didnโ€™t engage more providers and hard working Vermonters before they came up with sweeping overhaul plans, but weโ€™re doing our best to come up with efficiencies.

Q. What about the campaign? Is there a problem with having a summer session?

Shumlin: Iโ€™ve said right from the beginning about all those campaign questions, my job is to do the best job I can as Senate president and thatโ€™s what Iโ€™m going to focus on.

Q. I just wondered if thereโ€™s a special session in the summer if thatโ€™s going to screw things up for raising money.

Shumlin: I donโ€™t think so. I donโ€™t think it has to do with the campaign, I think it has to do with for 10 years as Senate president Iโ€™ve been consistent in understanding that my job is to get the peopleโ€™s work done in a timely fashion and get the citizen Legislature home, and Iโ€™m not planning to sway from that commitment.

Q. Potentially then there could be a battle between the House and the Senate over the special session?

Shumlin: Well, I donโ€™t think weโ€™ll have a battle. I think what the members see here is for us to work through the problems in the administrationโ€™s plan and come up with real solutions, and if we can do that, I donโ€™t think the Legislature will come back.

Q. What about raising more money somehow so that you can take more time to figure out some of the problems?

Shumlin: Government is extraordinarily efficient. The mistake that was made by the administration was to propose cuts when they were supposed to restructure. So letโ€™s try to get this back on course and continue what can be a very important process. Change is hard and the administration didnโ€™t help matters, but letโ€™s not forget the goal โ€“ making government more efficient, providing services to the people that need us in a more thoughtful, cost-effective way. Business has been doing this for years, thereโ€™s no reason why government canโ€™t do it.

The best way to resist change is to complain about the process.


VTDigger's founder and editor-at-large.