Sens. Tim Ashe, D/P-Chittenden, and Dick Sears, D-Bennington. File photo by Hilary Niles/VTDigger
Sens. Tim Ashe, D/P-Chittenden, and Dick Sears, D-Bennington. File photo by Hilary Niles/VTDigger

A legislative panel has come to an agreement with the Shumlin administration on $31.28 million in cuts to the state budget. Two senators voted against the proposal.

Lawmakers ultimately approved a rescission that will remove a 1.6 percent increase in Medicaid reimbursements for health care providers. That move alone saves the state about $10 million.

Gov. Peter Shumlin told reporters that revenues were up this year over last, itโ€™s just that theyโ€™re up โ€œless than we were hoping.โ€

โ€œThatโ€™s why we had to make these tough decisions,โ€ Shumlin said. โ€œLetโ€™s see where the economy goes, itโ€™s a fragile recovery, we continue to create jobs but weโ€™re being fiscally responsible by making these decisions and Iโ€™m grateful to the legislature for making it.โ€

The retraction of the 1.6 percent Medicaid increase was unfortunate, but he said his administration is โ€œthe one that finally started increasing reimbursement rates to hospitals and to our hard-working doctors and providers.โ€

โ€œTheyโ€™re working in a broken reimbursement system,โ€ Shumlin said. โ€œWeโ€™re trying to fix that. Weโ€™re proud to have raised that considerably last year. Weโ€™d like to continue to raise it in future, but obviously we canโ€™t do it with money we donโ€™t have. Itโ€™s the stark reality of being a governor. You canโ€™t spend money you donโ€™t have. Iโ€™m not willing to say to Vermont taxpayers, โ€˜hey, give us more.โ€™ Vermont taxpayers are paying enough.โ€

The 10-member Joint Fiscal Committee initially rejected Gov. Peter Shumlinโ€™s proposal and asked the administration to find more money for disability services and elder care. They also insisted on restoration of funding for a program that helps mentally ill young adults.

Lawmakers insisted that the funding come from the Vermont Enterprise Fund and a carry-forward in Medicaid funding. The enterprise fund was originally set at $4.5 million and was designed to provide an incentive to maintain the presence of a large employer, which was widely speculated to be IBM, in the state. Lawmakers pointed out that the money had not been disbursed, and no proposal has been filed with the state for the money.

Jim Reardon, the commissioner of the Department of Finance and Management, told lawmakers that the governor wasnโ€™t happy about transferring money out of the fund to balance the budget, but he agreed to shift $706,000 of it to disability and elder care services. Shumlin had already tapped $250,000 of it in his rescission proposal, bringing the Vermont Enterprise Fund down to $3.5 million.

Shumlin said he didnโ€™t want to see the enterprise fund go down, โ€œjust like I didnโ€™t want to see anything go, but the bottom line is, it leaves us $3.5 million in fund, and weโ€™ll use that as wisely as we can to help grow jobs that are here as well as to bring new jobs into Vermont.โ€

The reduction in state spending is a response to a July 24 revised economic outlook for the coming year that estimates state revenues will be down by 3 percent. While tax receipts have increased year-over-year since the Great Recession, they have grown more slowly than anticipated and have not kept up with state spending. Revenues will be $28 million less than the stateโ€™s economists predicted in January. In July, actual tax receipts were down $1.8 million.

Sen. Jane Kitchel, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said the recovery is much slower than lawmakers have experienced in the past.

โ€œIt is obviously disappointing,โ€ Kitchel said. โ€œWe built a budget with revenues at a certain level and they didnโ€™t come in and to have to go in and align budget with spending and revenues is always difficult.โ€

Two members of the Joint Fiscal Committee voted against the rescission proposal: Sens. Tim Ashe, D/P-Chittenden, and Diane Snelling, R-Chittenden. Ashe said he voted no โ€œprimarily because he wasnโ€™t ready to say yes.โ€

โ€œI remain concerned about retracting that 1.6% reimbursement because I think itโ€™s still going to be a priority when we come back in January,โ€ Ashe said. โ€œMy feeling is, Iโ€™d rather it be a default setting going in to January. There are a few other areas that with more time we could have shaved from the budget that wouldnโ€™t disadvantaged people, but in the time frame we had we didnโ€™t quite get those advanced where I could make a proposal.โ€

Snelling objected for philosophical reasons. She wants the Legislature to use a more data-driven approach to setting budget priorities.

Here is a rundown of the cuts:

  • The stateโ€™s community designated agencies, which provide services to mentally ill and disabled Vermonters, will still see a reduction in funding of at least $5 million.
  • The governor is seeking to reduce the stateโ€™s drug and alcohol program by about $673,000. Earlier this year, Shumlin made opiate addiction the centerpiece of his State of the State address and captured national media attention for his focus on getting drug addicts into treatment. The proposed cuts eliminate a financial incentive payment for substance abuse treatment providers and carry through the level funding of Medicaid reimbursements.
  • The Shumlin administration also proposes to rescind a 1 percent increase to appropriations for the University of Vermont, the Vermont Student Assistance Corp. and the Vermont State Colleges.
  • Working landscape grants would be reduced by about $280,000 under the plan.
  • The state no longer needs to spend $500,000 on the All-Felon DNA program thanks to a recent ruling from the Vermont Supreme Court that determined that taking a DNA sample from a suspect before he or she is convicted is unconstitutional.
  • The Shumlin administration will not fill vacancies in positions in state government, including a seat on the Superior Court. Seven open state trooper positions will not be filled for a savings of $500,000.

State employees are untouched by the rescissions, and, according to Reardon, were not interested in reopening their contract with the state to discuss furloughs or salary concessions. The stateโ€™s workforce took a 3 percent pay cut during the recession, and 660 positions were eliminated when the state saw revenues decline by 7 percent and 5 percent in 2008 and 2009, respectively.

Editor’s note: This story was updated with quotes from Shumlin, Ashe and Kitchel at 6:15 a.m. Aug. 14.

VTDigger's founder and editor-at-large.

3 replies on “Lawmakers make slight alterations in $31 million budget cuts”