Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

5 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Good coverage of the two new candidates for the appointment. Listening to my co-workers in education grumble about backward thinking Vilaseca carries to work each day may actually come to an end.

  2. I have said for a long time that Brent Kay should run the state education system. Smart, savvy, an excellent communicator, Brent has a track record worth a look. I may not agree with him on everything, (for instance, math and science cannot be “overemphasized” given our lack of competitiveness in the new global economy and our slide further into a stagnant, consumer based economy), but he is the type of common sense leader we need going forward.

    Brent would be a major improvement from where we have been in our state education system.

  3. Governor Shumlin needs to ignore this limited list of candidates and choose someone outside the VT K-12 environment. Higher education, as well as our Community College needs to be represented in any progressive reform.

    1. As noted above, at least one of the finalists lectured, albeit briefly, at a (Canadian) university. Although that, as well as his K-12 experience, was of limited and part-time duration while he was serving as a district supervisor.

      Title 15, Chapter 5, Section 212 of the Vermont code sets out the duties of the Commissioner of Education. Higher education is mentioned in only 1 of 17 sub-sections and only in passing. http://www.leg.state.vt.us/statutes/fullsection.cfm?Title=16&Chapter=005&Section=00212)

      H. 440, which establishes the cabinet post of Secretary of the Agency of Education, makes no mention whatever of higher education .
      http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/2012/Acts/

  4. A candidate for Education Secretary supervised “a school district in Saskatchewan province in Canada, overseeing a region so expansive that some schools were as far apart as 6,000 miles.”

    Not likely. Maybe 600 kilometers?

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Candidates for new secretary of education position come from divergen..."