Activists protest outside conservative Super PAC funder’s house

Peter Sterling and Kathie McClure stand outside Lenore Broughton's house in Burlington. Photo by Andrew Stein

Peter Sterling and Kathie McClure stand outside Lenore Broughton’s house in Burlington. Photo by Andrew Stein

A small crowd of protesters funneled through the streets of Burlington’s Old North End on Thursday, heading to the Henry Street home of Lenore Broughton, who has backed Vermonters First, a Super PAC.

In the face of accusations that they were trying to bully the conservative political financier, the protesters said they simply wished to talk her out of financing a campaign against a single-payer, publicly funded health care system.

No discussion ensued, however, because Broughton did not come to the door. The house appeared empty, save for a lone traffic cone by the front entrance and electric orange construction tape lining the porch.

With protesters peacefully brandishing pro single-payer signs on the street, Peter Sterling, director of the single-payer advocacy group Vermont Leads, walked up to Broughton’s doorstep and left a letter.

“We believe the current system relying on private insurance companies is failing our state as evidenced by the 47,000 uninsured Vermonters and the additional 120,000 under-insured Vermonters,” read the letter. “We ask you to sit down and talk with us about stopping your campaign that will have very serious financial and health consequences for almost every Vermonter.”

Broughton is the only known contributor to the Vermont-based, conservative super PAC called Vermonters First. As of September’s campaign finance filing, she had donated $100,000 in funds and $34,000 in services. Based on a VTDigger investigation with the Investigative News Network, she is also the sixth top political donor in the state.

Thursday’s protest came almost one month after the super PAC aired its third television advertisement, which warned Vermonters that shifting to a single-payer system would cause the largest tax hike in state history — a claim that VTDigger and Seven Days’ “Fact Checker” found to be true.

Organized by Sterling, the demonstration began at Pomeroy Park, just off of North Street, and finished at Broughton’s home around the corner. Only about 15 protesters showed up and the media cavalry that ensued rivaled that number.

“I asked everyone to come out today not to protest Ms. Broughton’s right to participate in the political process,” said Sterling. “It is her radical agenda for health care reform that I think needs to be publicized. Ms. Broughton wants a future without public health care, instead relying on private markets to provide affordable health care.”

VTDigger was unable to reach Broughton for comment.

The protesters

The protest featured speeches from Sterling; Mari Cordes, president of the Vermont Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals; and Kathie McClure, known nationally as the “Purple Bus Lady.”

Sterling is the founder of Vermont Leads, a 501(c)(4) advocacy group funded by the SEIU, a national union, that has launched a media and grassroots campaign for a publicly funded health care system. Cordes has been an outspoken single-payer health care activist associated with the Vermont Workers Center.

McClure, who is a licensed attorney from Georgia and a blogger for the Huffington Post, has traveled roughly 30,000 miles over the past four years, advocating across the U.S. for more affordable health care. And she has done so in her little purple bus.

Kathie McClure and her purple bus. Photo by Andrew Stein

Kathie McClure and her purple bus. Photo by Andrew Stein

McClure took to the road and formed the nonprofit VoteHealthcare.org when her epileptic daughter and diabetic son’s health insurance costs shot through the roof.

“As our kids got to the point where … we couldn’t keep them on our policy, we realized they were headed into the health care buzz saw,” she said. “They were going to face a lifetime of unaffordable premiums that were probably going to hamstring them for the rest of their lives.”

She realized that there were scores of families in the same situation as hers, and her family couldn’t change the health care system on its own. So, one night, she turned to her husband and told him she wanted to hit the road to advocate for health care reform across the United States. The only thing she needed, she said, was a bus. McClure found a bus and painted it purple. Since 2008, she has visited 38 states.

“I think you’re doing a great thing here in Vermont, and I’m glad to see you’re moving toward a single-payer system,” she told the Vermont crowd. Then, she made for the bus and hopped behind the wheel.

Driving slowly down the street, the protesters followed her to Broughton’s house, while small children looked on wide-eyed from nearby windows.

One of those protesters was University of Vermont senior Emily Reynolds, who majors in biochemistry. She plans to practice medicine and hopes to do so on the platform of a reformed health care finance system.

“I’ve been volunteering in hospitals since I was 15, and I’ve just seen too many people die because they couldn’t get health care,” she said. “It’s really sad for providers; it’s really sad for communities; and it’s costing us a fortune. This woman (Broughton) is using a lot of money to put up a lot of bad publicity and smear the (single-payer) campaign … and I think someone needs to stand up to that agenda.”

Reynolds said that while studying comparative health systems in Norway, she was extremely impressed by the Scandinavian nation’s single-payer model.

“If you look at single payer over there it’s just so much less expensive,” she said. “Sometimes we spend up to 30 percent of a health care budget on administration. That’s just absurd. In a functioning system you spend 5-10 percent and a lot more money would go to actually treating patients. Right now, a lot of it is going to making a lot of CEOs a lot of money.”

Bullying

More than 30 minutes before the protest began, the founder of Vermonters First, Tayt Brooks, issued a press statement criticizing Vermont Leads.

“Vermont Leads should be ashamed of itself and its leaders for staging an angry protest at the private residence of a respected Vermont citizen,” he wrote. “This action is not only threatening but it is clearly meant to intimidate and silence a citizen. … These types of gatherings are better suited for the streets and public facilities and should never be used to bully another in their home.”

In Brooks’ press release, he quoted Broughton, who took a jab at Vermont Leads for receiving funds from out-of-state groups.

“I support Vermonters First because I believed outside groups were coming into our state and drowning out the voices of the people who actually live here,” said Broughton. “Now I know it for a fact. They’re outside my house. We should not allow ourselves to be bullied in our state, and I’m sure Vermonters won’t.”

Single payer protester. Photo by Andrew Stein

Single payer protester. Photo by Andrew Stein

Sterling said that this isn’t an incident of bullying, but rather a group of people practicing their democratic right to assemble in a public place. Due to the cloaked nature of super PACs, representatives from Vermont Leads thought this would be the most effective method for protesting Vermont First robotic calls, mass mailings and a television ad that aimed to create a “scare campaign” around a single-payer system, Sterling said.

“If any corporation were running a similar ad campaign, we would go to their corporate offices and hold a rally with the exact same event, saying: ‘We believe health care reform is too important to be left to for-profit corporations, public health care is important,'” he said. “Now, we can’t do that in the case of Vermonters First. You can’t protest outside of a P.O. box.”

Chris Curtis, chair of Vermont Leads, brushed aside the comments about bullying.

“This is all about an important public policy issue and it’s not about personalities,” he said. “It’s part of our mission to provide education and outreach, so making public statements and standing up for single payer is an important part of what we do, and that’s what we’re doing here today.”

Brooks and Broughton weren’t the only ones to question Vermont Leads’ tactics. Kristin Sohlstrom, who works in the private health insurance sector, told VTDigger that she too feels bullied. What she’s particularly bothered by, she said, is her inability to comment or interact with others on Vermont Leads’ Facebook page. When she sent Sterling a message about the issue, she said he didn’t get back to her.

“I have no idea what has gotten me censored because there has been no response,” she wrote via email.

When Sterling was asked whether his organization censors its Facebook page, he said it does, but within reason.

“We have had to censor people who use profanity — people who are really vexed. There is a difference between having a discussion of the role of private sector in providing health care and calling people names like fascist or socialist,” he said. “For those people, yeah, we have not allowed them to participate in the discussion because it just drags it down.

“As the old saying goes: The problem with fighting with a pig is that you both get dirty, but the pig likes it.”

Correction: The protest was held on Thursday. 

Andrew Stein

Leave a Reply

90 Comments on "Activists protest outside conservative Super PAC funder’s house"

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Kristin Sohlstrom
3 years 10 months ago

Only the weak see a need to stifle the voice of the individual.

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago

I don’t think Lenore Broughton is all that weak, really.

Kristin Sohlstrom
3 years 10 months ago

This article isn’t just about Lenore Broughton. It’s also about Peter Sterling admitting to silencing and censorship. When he decides which voices to keep on the Vermont Leads facebook page, he determines for YOU which voices you will hear so is therefore controlling your conversations with other Vermonters. Like I said, only the weak need to do that.

Kathie McClure
3 years 10 months ago

Lenore Broughton may be one woman but she’s using her considerable wealth to influence public opinion. We protesters were using our voices to disagree with her. Welcome to democracy!

Patricia Crocker
3 years 10 months ago

And you would have no problem with people showing up to protest outside your home? And what about all the people who live in that neighborhood who have nothing to do with any of this? People have first amendment rights, yes, but most people use those rights with ethical standards and in the public square. You people are nothing but bullies!

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Yes, Patricia, I would have no trouble having a quiet,respectful crowd like that show up to bring me a letter inviting a discussion. With the press there, I would be glad of an opportunity to reasonably make a case for what I believed in. Especially if the group stayed in the public space outside my home, and did not seem to be threatening in any way and I could see there was press present. A great opportunity to show just why it is I’m willing to spend so much of my money on things I believe in ! But then… Read more »
Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Perhaps this isn’t as clear as I would like it : I mean MYSELF “running my mouth”, not anyone else ! I certainly have been commenting a lot on this topic, because it feels so important to thoroughly discuss it. To me it’s all about Citizens United, how do we keep our democracy, should we really give the hugest microphone to those individuals who have the most money ? What has happened to “campaign finance reform ? It seems to me the Supreme Court has just chucked it out the window ! What do we do about this ? !
Ludo Robertson
3 years 9 months ago

Don’t like protesters outside of the woman’s house on a public road? TOUGH. Democracy can be a bitch. I am glad some people are willing to protest. Without them, African Americans could be disenfranchised; children would have no child labor laws to protect them; and Ms. Broughton…would still not be able to vote!

Craig Powers
3 years 10 months ago

Peter Sterling would not even attend a health care forum held in Manchester earlier in the year to answer questions regarding health care. Now he wants to have a conversation to take VT forward with someone he disagrees with? What a hypocrite.

diane ballou
3 years 10 months ago

It seems I always run out of money just before the election, but I m sure it only seems that way. They called Lenre the lone donor, but to me she is the Lone Ranger and we don t deserve her.

3 years 10 months ago
I agree with Kristin. Only the weak need to stifle the voice of a private citizen. Is this the new Vermont debate strategy: “Let’s make a list of people who donate to causes we disagree with, and then we will stage protests and media events in front of their houses!” Oh yeah. According to this group, their only choice was to protest at her house or a P. O. Box. Sure. What about parks, town halls, town greens, Montpelier in front of the state house? They never heard of public places where such protests and rallies are traditionally held? Of… Read more »
Ross Laffan
3 years 10 months ago

Are you sure you agree with Kristin? Her comment can be taken more than one way it seems to me.

Kristin Sohlstrom
3 years 10 months ago

How so, Ross? I was stifled with no response and no explanation. I’m not one of the people who use terms like “socialist” because those folks have NOT been blocked from the Vermont Leads Facebook page and are still posting comments like that. It must be I was saying something the leaders didn’t want you to know or this guy is all about silencing women.

This is the danger of pro-Democracy groups, folks. You choose your leader then they steal your voice. The dirty little secret is, they know this and hope you don’t find out.

susan santerre
3 years 10 months ago
When are we going to wake up and see what is happening all around us? These people’s actions are disrespectful, disgusting, and disturbing to say the least! Yet, we are suppose to sit back and tolerate this type of behavior, in the name of free speech? Their definition of “free speech” is “whatever we do for our cause is fine”. For example, Even young children are taught that it is against the law to put anything in someone’s mailbox; yet we can read about this guy delivering Lenore a letter (which was put in her mailbox according to another report)…why… Read more »
Justin Farrar
3 years 4 months ago

Thank you Susan! The left has no respect for the values this country was built on and are destroying this country!

Brian Caldwell
3 years 10 months ago

Keep up the great work Lenore Broughton. As the old saying goes, if you throw a rock and a dog yelps, you hit your mark. Sounds like the dogs are yelping loudly…….

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago

Hmm….. stoning dogs is ” great work “? Sounds like those Republicans really ARE mean sons a’guns.

Kay Trudell
3 years 10 months ago
Let’s see . . . the political left has the right to freedom of speech and thought, but a private citizen on the political right does not. These protesters are socialist bullies. SEIU is a large, socialist, out-of-state urban union with no locals in Vermont. Check them out on YouTube. You can see pictures of them marching in their purple shirts and carrying Communist flags. The pictures speak for themselves. I was a union member for 20 years, but I am absolutely opposed to what these bullies did to a private citizen. Lenore is not even a public elected official.… Read more »
3 years 10 months ago
They are upset with Lenore because she spent her own money to influence politics in her home state? When it comes to money influencing politics in Vermont, what about the $500,000 the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation gave to the Green Mountain Care Board to push the single payer approach? What about Susan Baker of VPIRG being the Vermont representative of the George Soros and Tides Foundation supported Health Care for America Now? This is the group that funded a study in 2009 about the cost of health insurance in Vermont. The study was used to justify the move to single… Read more »
Patricia Crocker
3 years 10 months ago

Right on Robert! These people simply use selective moral indignation. Their motto is “Do as I say, not as I do!”

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Patricia Crocker – I’m not talking about money spent on issues by lobby groups, which are traceable and can be held accountable. I’m not talking about George Soros or Sheldon Adelson or the Koch Brothers….. I’m talking about a new development in Vermont politics that has suddenly appeared on the scene: a super PAC supposedly funded by one person ( we don’t even know for sure) that is involving itself in all individual candidates’ races all the way down to state representative level, and not accountable to any party, or anybody. I am” upset with Lenore” because her super PAC… Read more »
patricia crocker
3 years 10 months ago
How does the media fit into this? The pro-single payer side has a media monopoly for the most part. The media pushes a liberal agenda. Conservative groups try to get their message out and press releases never get published. Several groups that I belong to have had to resort to paying for ads to make sure that it gets in the papers, and even then, it gets buried and is hard to find. This lack of true journalism has pushed people to the point that they feel the need to put money behind their message. If you want to complain… Read more »
Annette Renaud
3 years 10 months ago
Lenore. Beautiful Lenore, did you ever think that we would ever live in a time where your politically views and support would target a person to bully tactics? Did you ever think that independent and self-reliant Vermonters would forgo demanding Montpelier to bring jobs for citizen sustainability to vote for programs instead? Did you ever think that Vermonters would vote into office a man like Bernie? What a ponzie scheme he has going…..takes 1000 from you and hands you 50 like he is doing you the favor…..I am not quite getting the logic….He is not bringing anything to Vermont..wouldn’t you… Read more »
Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago

Probably don’t really need to speak up for Bernie, because plenty of people in this state have been helped by him and through the legislation he has worked for. But just want to mention the health and dental clinics he helped establish in my town and neighboring town, working with local people. Because there is a sliding scale fee service, many people now can pay what they can afford, and finally get the dental and health care they need. It’s been a very positive thing for our community.

Mike Kerin
3 years 10 months ago

Money is not speech.

Craig Powers
3 years 10 months ago

Then VT Leads should not have been there with their $300K from the out of state union. Works both ways, Mike.

Mike Kerin
3 years 10 months ago

You’re right. I repeat, money is not speech. On either side!

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Mike is absolutely right. You need money to stand up against money. If the Supreme Court is going to change the way campaigns are run by saying “money is speech” and you can spend as much as you want, then the one with the most money has the biggest megaphone and can drown everyone else out. It’s crazy…..it’s NOT democracy, but unfortunately it’s what we’ve got to deal with until we can change it. The money from Vermont Leads is spent by Vermonters, and it is run by Vermonters, and there were no “outsiders” gathered peaceably to petition Ms. Broughton… Read more »
Patricia Crocker
3 years 10 months ago

And you folks never factor in money when it comes to the media who are overwhelmingly liberal and are mothpieces for the Democrats and Progressives! Last time I checked, media companies are corporations with lots of money!

Patricia Crocker
3 years 10 months ago

That’s “Mouthpieces” for the democrats and Progressives

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
The interesting thing is that Vermont Leads is about an issue : universal, affordable health care. It’s an issue that “the out of state union” supports because their membership includes care givers. But Vermont Leads is a Vermont organization run by Vermonters, who are making all the decisions about using this money. One thing they are NOT doing with it is supporting candidates’ campaigns all over the state. They are trying to educate people about the health care law, give information and encourage discussion and support of the issue. What Lenore Broughton’s super PAC is doing is supporting candidates at… Read more »
Annette Renaud
3 years 10 months ago
I am the soil. I have been around the boundaries of Vermont before there were even borders. I fought for Vermont to separate from New York AND from New Hampshire. My blood, my sweat, and my tears covered the ground as my mine eyes could see the vision of true self government, independence, freedom, innovation, and faith. I knew, as well as other fellow soldiers that we did not deserve to sub-serve ourselves to any one government entity. I gave my life for the cause over and over again. My heart is breaking over the take over of what we… Read more »
walter moses
3 years 10 months ago

quoath the raven………………

Marianne Ward
3 years 10 months ago

Protests are intended to educate the masses in public squares. Targeting someone at their home on a secluded street is not a protest – it’s harrassment, and could easily incite fear in anyone singled-out.

While I support single-payer, and am opposed to Ms. Broughton using her financial advantage to impose her political will on Vermonters, I cannot support Vermont Leads’ bullying tactics. They have crossed the line of fair-play and decency.

The solution – Get money out of politics!!

Kathie McClure
3 years 10 months ago

Marianne – I agree, let’s get money out of politics!

As for the protest, this has been blown completely out of proportion. We did our public speaking in a nearby park. Then we walked, peaceably, to her home to drop off a letter requesting the opportunity for further discussion. We did not raise our voices. We took a few pictures and left.

We would’ve happily taken our concerns to Ms. Broughton’s SuperPac if it had an office but it only has a PO Box.

Patricia Crocker
3 years 10 months ago

But why did you feel the need to walk to her home? You still violated the sanctity of someone’s home and illegally placed mail in her mailbox! Yes, it is a Federal offense to place anything other than official mail in a mailbox. You could have easily had your little protest at the park and put your letter in the mail. It is all on videotape and I hope someone actually charges your group with mail fraud! You people are despicable!

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago

They did have their “little protest” at the park a few blocks away.

patricia crocker
3 years 10 months ago

You obviously missed the part in my statement about putting the letter in the official mail (legally), instead of leading the caravan down to her private home and committing mailfraud and illegally place it in her mailbox. You obviously had to trespass and go on her property to put it in her mailbox (illegally.

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago

Patricia, I didn’t miss that part”, I just wasn’t a witness, so I didn’t feel I could comment on something I didn’t see.
The protest & speakers at the park was on news video.

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
I’m afraid I have a very different view of Lenore Broughton’s super Pac efforts. They started coming to my attention when I got her first mailing, filled with misleading and inaccurate information ,meant to scare people out of their pajamas, along with absentee ballot application & addressed envelope. I’ve been doing what a normal citizen does to support the local candidate for Rep. from my town, knocking on doors, helping with fund-raisers, writing a letter in the local paper. But I don’t have money to compete with this slick propaganda going out to everyone in town. What’s worse, by now… Read more »
Marianne Ward
3 years 10 months ago

Paula S and Kathie M,
I’m with you all the way, that people with money should not have greater access to participating in the democratic process.

But, if we are going to label it bullying, doesn’t that then equate money with speech?

Just because there is no physical address of Vermonters First to protest at does not justify harrassing Ms. Broughton at her home. As already suggested there are plenty of public spaces to protest at and still target Ms. Broughton’s abuse of financial influence.

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Marianne, thanks for your thoughtfulness on this issue. It’s a valid debate. I don’t view it as “harassment” to quietly and respectfully stand in a public space outside someone’s home and ” petition for grievances”….it’s legal and a right. One person only went to the door to deliver a letter, and from the look of it, the rest of the group was not anywhere near where they could invade anyone’s sanctity. If I’d been in this situation and had the courage of my convictions, I would have come out & engaged the group. After all the press was there, and… Read more »
Eric Bradford
3 years 10 months ago

People with “single payer now” signs should be going to Peter Shumlin’s house. He’s the one that just pushed the start of the single payer discussion back from 2013 to 2015.

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Eric Bradford, this is a valid point for you to raise, and gives me an opportunity to say that most Vermonters who support the health care reform look at this as a positive move. Here’s the reason : there was hope early on that because the Affordable Care Act was geared to encourage the freedom for states to tailor their own health care innovations, (as long as the care offered was the same or better than in the ACA ), that Vermont could get an early waiver to move in the direction it has set out with Act 48. But… Read more »
Eric Bradford
3 years 10 months ago
Didn’t Spaulding just say they were on track for their January 2013 deadline just a few days ago? I wonder what changed. It sure as heck wasn’t the chances of getting a waiver, those are no more or less bleak today than they were six months ago. On track for 1/13 means you’re almost done, not “we’re going to take another two and a half years to mull it over.” The notion that it will take four and a half years since Hsiao’s report (and hilarious payroll tax proposal) to get a FIRST DRAFT of the funding mechanism out the… Read more »
Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago

I don’t know any more than you seem to , Eric, but my impression is that there will be a presentation, but not a final vote on the funding mechanism by the legislature in this coming session. That would indeed be an opportunity to get the discussion started.
Hopefully someone who knows will comment, or one of us will check with the GMC Board , etc. and get the straight scoop.

walter carpenter
3 years 10 months ago
“Those who support a free market approach to addressing social ills cannot even come close to matching these resources.” Mr. Maynard, this is grossly incorrect. The advocates of a free-market approach to what you call “addressing social ills” (how the free-market, i.e. corporate, approach does that is another question in of itself, since it never has before) have legions of lobbyists representing their interests. A simple search on the legislative web site will reveal how many of them there are. Luckily, Vermont requires all lobbyists to be registered with the state. Companies like Blue Cross Blue shield and IBM, for… Read more »
3 years 10 months ago
The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision (i.e. SuperPACs), is based on the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights, specifically the right to “Freedom of Speech. The Supreme Court has interpreted this as “Freedom of $peech”. How much $peech is in your wallet? However, the Constitution does not provide an explicit “Right to an Audience”. So we have the right to press the Mute button on our TV remote controls when negative Super PAC ads appear (or change the channel, or go to the kitchen for snacks and beverage). Debates are great and welcomed (but the candidates for Governor have limited the… Read more »
Josh Schlossberg
3 years 10 months ago

What is an “activist?” You mean a “citizen?”

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
” And you folks never factor in money when it comes to the media who are overwhelmingly liberal and are mouthpieces for the Democrats and Progressives! Last time I checked, media companies are corporations with lots of money!” Patricia Crocker – it’s a challenge to answer this with a straight face. “Liberal media” is sort of a sick joke. I would call it “Centrist media”. But your view is so restricted to a far right-wing perspective that you haven’t noticed that ” left-wing” views just aren’t covered by the mainstream media. And if you don’t see them on your favorite… Read more »
Eileene Peterson
3 years 10 months ago
It seems to me that all the haranguing about Ms Broughton spending her own money to support a cause that she obviously believes in, is a diversion tactic for the real issue . . . the inability of those in favor of a single payer system in Vermont to be able to adequately change the doubts of those who still have some Vermont common sense. The single payer people claim the adds run by Vermont First use scare tactics to influence Vermonters. If this is the case, prove your point. Provide the proof that shows the information put out by… Read more »
Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Eileen Peterson, you aren’t reading very carefully – Ms Broughton is funding a super PAC that has sent multiple mailings supporting not a particular “cause” but candidates in all races all over the state. The mailings and ads use misinformation on a number of things and the kind of scary language best described as propaganda. But all candidates being supported in this way, while having the advantage of lots of mailings with their name on it, have complete deniability because super PACS aren’t supposed to be co-ordinated with anyone’s campaign. They have a big money advantage because of all the… Read more »
walter carpenter
3 years 10 months ago
“If this is the case, prove your point. Provide the proof that shows the information put out by Vermont First is wrong. Since I have seen no proof that contradicts Vermont First’s information and the information provided at various health care information meetings, I must assume there is none.” The proof is all around you. It is in the number of people that die each year in the usa for lack of access to health care because of lack of access to affordable insurance or any insurance at all. http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2009/09/new-study-finds-45000-deaths-annually-linked-to-lack-of-health-coverage/ The proof is in the number of bankruptcies in America… Read more »
Eric Bradford
3 years 10 months ago
You do your cause no good by responding to a request to “provide the proof that shows the information put out by Vermont First is wrong” with links to stories about how the current system is bad. VF makes very specific points regarding VT’s experiment, none of which you’ve addressed. “The proof is that in nations with single-payer health systems, whatever the type, statistics like these are unknown because they do not exist.” That many supporters of this vague notion of single payer in Vermont don’t seem to understand the difference between nationwide single payer and an attempt to implement… Read more »
3 years 10 months ago
The above comments have been interesting. But it seems to me that Ms. Broughton wants to be a player on the big scene, and she’s being treated (civilly) as a player on the big scene. I don’t have the money Broughton has, so when I’ve gone out to make public statements I’m out there in person for folks to interact with. I don’t think Broughton or anybody else who wants to purchase their way into the big public discussions should be or is immune to that need for face to face interactions. If Broughton won’t make herself available somewhere away… Read more »
Eileene Peterson
3 years 10 months ago
Ms Schramm, You are not reading carefully. Much of the article was about the protesters and the healthcare issue. Additionally, many of the posts from people regarding this article are about Ms Broughton spending her money on a superpac that promotes her ideas and beliefs as they pertain to Vermont. I do not believe that just because you have money, you loose your right to have an opinion and promote your opinion. There are few rich people here in Vermont (we are loosing more with each stupid law passed), and many more people of moderate means. Why do you need… Read more »
Kelly Cummings
3 years 10 months ago
Eileene Peterson, as well as others here. You really need to learn the difference between Opinion and Propaganda. If Vermonters First and Lenore Broughton, would come out and say their opinion you might have an argument here….at least about showing up at her house. You know for instance, “We believe health care should be a commodity and bought and sold on the Free-Market.” Or maybe somehting like this, “We believe insurance companies should be allowed to charge whatever they want and set whatever parameters they want, even if it means some will be left behind and some will go without.”… Read more »
Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Eileene Peterson… you say ” I do not believe that just because you have money, you loose your right to have an opinion and promote your opinion.” Who in the world is saying that you loose your right to have an opinion and promote them because you have money ?? ! Give me a break ! NO ONE is saying that ! But you have to try to think about what a superPAC can do that an individual can’t do. Someone can give quite a bit of money directly to as many candidates as they want to support , and… Read more »
James Gill
3 years 10 months ago

One person’s ‘Opinion’ is another person’s ‘Propaganda’. Just how do we tell them apart?

I guess we just employee the ‘Information Police’, like Ms. Cumming.

I guess I am just so stupid and will be unduly influenced, such that I will need Ms. Cummings to determine what information I should hear, because she knows the difference.

Kelly Cummings
3 years 10 months ago
James Gill. What an absolute cop-out. Let me help you out a bit. Here are the definitions for you. According to Webster’s (unless you have a problem with Webster’s Dictionary…this ought to suffice) Opinion: 1. A belief based on grounds insufficient to produce certainty. 2. A personal attitude or appraisal. Propaganda: 1.Information or ideas methodically spread to promote or injure a cause, nation, etc. 2. The deliberate spreading of such information or ideas. “I guess I am just so stupid and will be unduly influenced, such that I will need Ms. Cummings to determine what information I should hear, because… Read more »
Eric Bradford
3 years 10 months ago
“Propaganda: 1.Information or ideas methodically spread to promote or injure a cause, nation, etc.” The “etc.” that you left out is “a person.” Every ad on TV and in print is propaganda by the literal definition of the word. “It is our duty as citizens to stand up against propaganda.” Peter Shumlin’s campaign is running ads promoting his candidacy, are you going to stand up to them? I would love to see a meaningful discussion on this topic, triggered by the VF ads. But if no one is going to even attempt to point out where they’re wrong, I’m not… Read more »
Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Eric – I gave you a good example back in my post to Eileen Peterson. How about a discussion about that example, at least ? “Vermonters First propaganda : “this program will cost a STAGGERING $5 billion” Now doesn’t that sound terrifying ? ( fact check: this is WHAT WE ALREADY PAY FOR HEALTH CARE IN THIS STATE; the reform is taking the amount we now spend for health care, reducing administrative costs, and making care accessible to everyone, and holding down the $1 million/day increase we face that’s going to bankrupt this state if we do nothing).” Please notice… Read more »
Eric Bradford
3 years 10 months ago

So propaganda is untrue, misleading, or just something that someone says to persuade? You two really need to get your stories straight on this.

Beyond that, you’re trying to take this down a completely different road and I’m not following you.

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Eric – No, it’s not a “different road” that I’m trying to take you down…..it’s the reality we are facing and affected by with the Supreme Court ruling that makes what Vermonters First is doing perfectly legal. Here’s today’s news on how Ms. Broughton has spent over half a million dollars on distorting the races in my county, and across Vermont. Keep in mind she is urging you to vote for specific people at every level : “As of Monday, Broughton has given a grand total of $683,961 to Vermonters First since the PAC was launched this summer. Of that… Read more »
Lance Hagen
3 years 10 months ago

I am astonished in reading the posts from Ms. Schramm. She wants it both ways. She wants to stop Ms. Broughton from spending her money to influence public policy, but yet she has no problem with SEIU or Ms. McClure spending their money to influence public policy.

Who in their right mind would want to have a talk about this issue with Ms. Schramm, since all she wants to do is ‘muffle’ those who don’t match her political position.

James Gill
3 years 10 months ago

Ms. Cummings, since you brought it up, was Al Gore’s movie (An Inconvenient Truth) ‘fact’, ‘opinion’ or ‘propaganda’?

Since you can tell the difference.

Kelly Cummings
3 years 10 months ago

You tell me James. This should be interesting. What do you think it was?

James Gill
3 years 10 months ago

I can’t tell, since I lack the expertise that you have

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago

James, you are just being coy. I’m guessing you have strong feelings & opinions about Al Gore’s movie, since you brought it up. If you serious about having a dialog, then HAVE one , for goodness sake !

Kelly Cummings
3 years 10 months ago

James….this strange conversation, if you can even call it that…with you….is over. Have a nice day.

James Gill
3 years 10 months ago
Ms. Schramm and Ms. Cummings, you seem to have missed the point. Both ‘Vermonters First’ and Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ used embellishments to present their positions. They have the right to do this and we also have a right to listen or not listen. The real danger is to have someone claim they know what is ‘Opinion’ and what is ‘Propaganda’ and make it a duty for citizens to stand up against it (I picture a motley crowd with torches and pitch folks matching on the castle). This is what was implied in Ms. Cummings posting at 10:25am Thank… Read more »
Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
James Gill – In response to your post beginning : “Ms. Schramm and Ms. Cummings, you seem to have missed the point”, I would appreciate it if you would respond to me separately about “propaganda”, since I directly tried to answer your earlier post question with the concrete example of it that you were asking for. I also invited discussion of that example. It’s not enough to say that it’s a “real danger” to claim to recognize some propaganda & urge people to stand against it. You’re the one seeing mobs with pitchforks….. I see a whole lot of other… Read more »
Matthew Ennis
3 years 10 months ago

I suggest people read an article from the New Yorker (9/24/12) entitled “The Lie Factory”, which proves how the idea of universal health care in America has been demonized since the 1930s
(http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/09/24/120924fa_fact_lepore).
The super-pac Vermonters First is a microcosm of what is happening across the nation, in which the Republican party, which has gone so far out of the mainstream, is intent on buying the election and brainwashing people.

David O'Brien
3 years 10 months ago

God help us.

Liz Schlegel
3 years 10 months ago

To all the folks who think VT and the Feds are putting you at risk by trying to ensure that everyone has health care – please, read this. Dr. Gawande is as thoughtful a commentator on the state of health care in America as you will find anywhere.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2012/06/something-wicked-this-way-comes.html

Eileene Peterson
3 years 10 months ago
Ms Schramm, Ms Cummings, Ms Schlegel et al, most Vermonters are inteligent adults who do not need you, SEIU/Vermont Leads or any other entity to filter information about what is in our best interest regarding an apropriate health care system here in Vermont. As an adult, I can use logic, do research and then deduce an out come once I have done both. I find it offensive that you seem to think the average Vermonter is incapable of doing these things and there for needs to have Vermont Leads, with the help of the Purple Bus and big money from… Read more »
walter carpenter
3 years 10 months ago

“inteligent adults who do not need you, SEIU/Vermont Leads or any other entity to filter information about what is in our best interest regarding an apropriate health care system here in Vermont.”

Does the Vermont First super pac fall under this category of an entity filtering information?

Liz Schlegel
3 years 10 months ago

Eileene: I’m confused. Are you attacking me for commenting? I don’t recall casting aspersions on your intelligence – I pointed you toward an excellent article that might inform your deductions about health care.

Eileene Peterson
3 years 10 months ago
Mr Carpenter, Vermont First Superpac is not picketing infront of private citizens house. I have no problem with Vermont Leads having an opinion ant puttinf forth their view. I do, however have a problem with attempting to quash the opposite view point through intimidation. I also have a problem when the viewpoint and the intimidation are paid for by out of state money. I believe we all have a right to our opinion and a right to express it. We have a responsibility to voice our opinions without attempting to silence other view points. Ms Schlegel, I cast no aspersions… Read more »
Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Eileene Peterson – I also respect everyone’s intelligence and haven’t called anyone incapable of getting informed. I don’t know where you get that from. When our new laws allow anyone to use any amount of money to do most anything to support individual candidate’s campaigns, as long as it isn’t “co-ordinated with their campaign”, we have a brand new day in campaign finance realities. We can see that insanity at that national level, if we’re paying attention, where the amount of money being spent on all races this year has far surpassed anything from before the Surpreme Court’s 2010 Citizens… Read more »
walter carpenter
3 years 10 months ago
“I do, however have a problem with attempting to quash the opposite view point through intimidation. I also have a problem when the viewpoint and the intimidation are paid for by out of state money.” This is why I asked the question that I did. You say you have a problem with out-of-state money coming in to intimidate people here. Ok, I am cool with that. Yet, you seem have no problem with in-state money doing the same thing, which is what this Vt. Group is doing — the mailings threatening that the earth will fall off its axis if… Read more »
Eric Bradford
3 years 10 months ago

@Paula Schramm
“When that money can be used to say almost anything, then yes, you do need to start having a discussion about what propaganda is”

Feel free to start any time. Regardless of how you define propaganda, both sides are “guilty” of spreading it.

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago

Eric- How about to responding to the one example I tried to outline for you ? That was an attempt at a discussion, which you seemed to be interested in having.
I’m not particularly speaking of “sides” myself. There are certainly more than 2 sides, no ?

Sorry if I misunderstood, and that you were just making a rhetorical statement. I’m a bit confused by what you’e saying.

Eric Bradford
3 years 10 months ago

What, the use of the word “staggering”? So the definition of propaganda is any phrase that uses an adjective?

Just define propaganda and I’ll gladly give you one or more examples meeting the definition that I’ve heard coming from pro-“single payer in Vermont” voices. In fact, I’ll bet I can pull at least one from this comment thread.

Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
I can see you’re not interested in a discussion ! Sorry, my mistake ! I was hoping you could respond to the discussion I gave about the use of the word staggering, how what it implies depends on the context given, and also the intentional attempt, not to present an opinion, but to actually mislead about the ” program” costing additional money , and so on. You could have tried reading what I wrote. In this case the mailer is using propaganda instead of offering an opinion because the framing of the information is intended to mislead. I’m trying to… Read more »
Eric Bradford
3 years 10 months ago
That you object to the word “staggering” in this context does not make a statement propaganda. The tax IS staggering. It will hit many individuals and businesses with no offsets whatsoever. It will transfer responsibility for this staggering amount of money to a group of people who will have to invent a framework in which it will be deployed, with no precedent (ie. individual US state single payer) as a blueprint. I’d say “staggering” is a vast understatement in this case. Has a US state ever more than doubled its budget in one fell swoop for any reason? Yeah, I’d… Read more »
Eileene Peterson
3 years 10 months ago
Ms Schramm, I suggest you start a movement. This seems to be what is being attempted with Vermont Leads. If enough Vermonters have the same opinion as you and Vermont Leads, they will back you and you will not need out of state money. If there are not enough Vermonters with your opinion, out of state money should not be allowed to ram through something that they do not want. Ms Broughton is only one person. Yes she may have money but if the majority of Vermonters are for single payer, they have more power than one wealthy person on… Read more »
Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Eileene Peterson – you’ve perhaps been out of the state for the last 5 years or so ? There IS a movement of the sort you’re talking about already, I don’t need to start one. It’s made up of a majority of Vermonters who would like to see the kind of health care reform that they elected Gov. Shumlin and many others to the legislature to carry out. The health care bill that was passed commits the legislature to come up with a universal, affordable, quality system that is transparent and has input from all of us. That’s a tall… Read more »
Paula Schramm
3 years 10 months ago
Eric Bradford – Thanks, you obviously did go back now & read what I wrote about an example of propaganda. But you didn’t get it right : “You claim that the word “staggering” is invalid because “it doesn’t increase what we’re already spending and does more with it, in a way that will keep down the current rate of increase” Nope, not what I said. Use of “staggering” was just to scare & stir people up. As staggering as what we pay for health care in Vermont is, that is the amount that we ARE paying now, and not an… Read more »
Eric Bradford
3 years 10 months ago

“you obviously did go back now & read what I wrote”

Kind of wish you would return the favor. The quote I provided was your verbatim explanation of why the word “staggering” was misleading.

wpDiscuz
Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Activists protest outside conservative Super PAC funder’s house"