Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

8 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Why Americans have not yet launched a revolution about voter id laws being pushed down our throats is something that is incredulous

  2. For those looking for a fun and accessible way to learn more about these types of problems and what we might do about them, I recommend a free online class (from coursera) called “Securing Digital Democracy” This is a brand new course and the first time anyone’s ever attempted to teach a large-scale online course about e-voting security.

    https://www.coursera.org/course/digitaldemocracy

  3. After just commenting about the average Vermonter’s lack of control over the GMP deal, “single payer” and now “OneCare”, reading this almost makes me believe I’m no longer living in a free country! I will get the book and read it immediately. The Koch brothers are scary. We probably do need to launch another revolution, and if Romney buys the election, I do believe we’ll have one. Enough is enough.

  4. Lets not forget the Vermont version of voter suppression known as Town Meeting.

    Vermont celebrates a Puritan “tradition” that prevents the home bound, those serving in our military, single/working parents, and the self employed from having a voice in government on the local level.

    Shameful.

    1. It’s a shame you have such a bleak view of the best democracy our country has to offer.

      A hypothetical married couple wants to buy a new car. Each receives promotional literature from numerous dealers, and test-drives several different makes and models. Then, with no discussion, each votes for which model he or she wants. Doesn’t make much sense, yet that is precisely what the Australian ballot is:

      An issue goes on the ballot, and after much campaigning, everyone votes. Victory is handed to whichever side has the most effective campaign, which usually means whichever side has the most money. Victory is seldom based on the actual merits of presented arguments, and is almost never based on knowledge of how one’s vote affects another.

      A more sensible way for a couple to select an automobile is for them to review promotional material and test drive models together, then discuss the pros and cons of each, then decide together which car will best suit both their needs. Likewise with town meeting:

      No matter how much campaigning there has been, and no matter how disingenuous or deceptive the stories told about any given issue, at town meeting, everyone, no matter how poor, may stand and give his or her viewpoint, and/or relate how voting one way or another will directly affect him or her. The town’s citizens have a thorough conversation about what to do, and they hear directly from those affected… before they vote (which is crucial).

      It is sad that participation in most town meetings is often low, but statistically speaking, if about thirty randomly selected people show up at town meeting to discuss and vote on the issues before the voters, Democracy will be better served than if a self-selected half of the population of a community votes by Australian Ballot. Because participation in town meeting is self selected, it is not quite as pure as a random selection, and certainly not as pure as 100 percent participation, but is still far superior to self-selected participation in Australian ballot.

      So let me ask you, Jim – should I infer from your note that you do not participate in town meeting? And if not, why not? You list some common excuses, but I submit that few are valid. It is a shame in this country that we have holidays to honour various people or aspects of our Democracy, but no holiday in which to practice it. It would make as much sense to have a day called “Thanksgiving,” but not have it off to assemble and dine with family and friends.

      However, the law does require your employer to give you (unpaid) time off to attend town meeting if you desire. Not as good as a paid holiday, I’ll allow, but good enough. Some people have given their lives to defend Democracy. If you can’t muster the commitment to give up part of one workday per year to go to town meeting and participate in it, don’t whine to me. You simply decided that money was more important than voting – which is fine – but it’s you – not town meeting – that suppressed your vote.

      For those serving overseas in the military and those you are characterizing as “home bound,” I will allow that it is a bit tough to include them in town meeting, but in most if not all communities, those two groups together would amount to a fraction of a percent of the eligible voters. It does not constitute a logical motive to hobble the more than 99 percent remaining with an ineffective placebo for Real Democracy, which as it happens, is the name of an excellent book on the subject.

      Read the book before you denigrate town meeting any further. Read the review here:

      http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/R/bo3641466.html

      And find the book here:

      http://www.alibris.com/booksearch?keyword=Frank+Bryan%2C+Real+Democracy&mtype=B&hs.x=0&hs.y=0&hs=Submit#search-anchor

      Good luck.

  5. Greg Palast also tells an amazing tale of how GWB stole the 2000 presidential election (with a little help from his friends and relatives)in his book ‘The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.’ While the vast majority of Americans who watched the nightly MSM accounts of how hanging chads caused several ballots to be disallowed, he goes into great depth to tell a different version of the events that led to the eight year presidential reign that will surely go down as one of the low points in US history. When it comes to getting to the truth, Palast has few, if any, peers.

  6. To this day I will never understand how anyone that reads and writes, can back any republican. Their villainous acts should point people back to either a Democrat or and Independant, never a republican. That they will stoop so low as to steal election in this day and age is nothing less than a very daring act. That they are not called to task for their thievery is astonishing in our digital soceity. But then Romney lied in front of 60 million people and was declare the so called winner in a debate that was so lopsided that to call anyone the loser would be the American public.

  7. I support voter ID so that my vote will count. I do not want non-citizens voting, college students voting twice (here in VT then in their hometowns), dead people voting:my mother in law received absentee ballots repeatedly over a 10 yr period even after her husband died – she’a a Democrat and has voted absentee ballot for about 20 years, for some reason her husband, who died in 1998, was not removed from the rolls and sent absentee ballots. She lives in Florida. She is honest and did not vote for him. Check this utube video out about Vt voter fraud (3/13/2012):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLSjL–qvsw

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Ballot bandits: Greg Palast explains how the 2012 elections could be ..."