Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

4 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. The state of Vermont should have about 1,600 inmates in our state total. that’s what we had in 2007 and its what we should have NOW, today in 2012.

    For that to happen, more money needs to be placed in those “Programs and Services” which a fair portion of those inmates actually need.

    Sentencing “non-violent” offenders with alternative sanctions to jail-time, isn’t exactly “innovation” but rather something we’ve known about for a long time.

    Taking five steps backwards, then two steps forward for some is “progress.”

    For me its still three steps backwards.

  2. Where are the alternative programs to incarceration in Bennington County? what funding has gone into them? Housing. education, job training, drug treatment–these are profoundly lacking in our community, and nothing has happened in recent memory to reverse the tide. I’m glad that these programs are getting lip service, a least, but show me the money.

  3. Corrections Commissioner Andy Pallito deserves a lot of the credit for the success of the war on recidivism. In one of the most difficult jobs in State government, he has done an outstanding job, often in the face of opposition from one contingent or another. Yet he has kept a steady hand on the wheel and the results are showing. Thank you, Commissioner Pallito!

    1. Kathy thank you.

      I’m all for giving credit to our commissioner Andy Pallito.

      I may humbly differ in opinion that our Vermont Commissioner of Corrections has less to do with recidivism than the types of laws we have in our legislature and HOW those laws are enforced.

      Its interesting to see how state governments process, package and disseminate information to their constituents. It doesn’t always project the most accurate of pictures.

      The total Vermont inmate population is still far disproportionate to what many would consider normal for its population and crime rate.

      If we could continue the downward reduction of a few hundred inmates to below 1,600 for the entire state that would be one thing. But if our inmate population grows so significantly over a ten to twenty year period that a reduction of a few hundred inmates every five to seven years still leaves us with a large growth in population; you know its time to look a little closer.

      The over-all upward trend in the Vermont inmate population over the past tweny years has seen periods which some have termed as: “Spiraling out of control” and I can see why.

      I would also recommend to not reference the “Rate of Recidivism” as a “WAR.” Americans tend to use this word a little too much lately. As if to glamourize, justify and promote our “Post 9/11″ imperial weight. “Wars” on Drugs, Terror, recidivism; slow it down a little with the “Wars.”

      I’m all for giving credit where credit is due. Its just that I’m not so sure we’d call this a “Success” just yet.

      There are still many changes that would benefit the Vermont Tax payer with regards to the Department of Corrections.

      So keep your “steady hand on the wheel” Commissioner Pallito.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Vermont’s prison reforms tamp down incarceration rates"