Montpelier 5/21/2012
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 21, 2012
Chance of Rain
79°/57°

Run of Site Leaderboard

youtube

Stonyfield Farm CEO: Big isn’t necessarily bad in the world of organics

Yogurt and fruit. Photo by Pietro C.

Yogurt and fruit. Photo by Pietro C.

Editor’s note: This article was first published by The Commons.

BRATTLEBORO—Gary Hirshberg disputes arguments within the organic food movement that only small organic is good organic.

Hirshberg, the CEO of Stonyfield Farm, the world’s largest organic yogurt company, outlined his views on the organic industry to Slow Living Summit participants last week.

He said now is the time to shift from big agribusiness to sustainable farming practices.

“We’re at a very poignant moment. We not only need to expedite our evolution, but address our M.O. within the progressive movement itself,” said Hirshberg.

At the same time, he said, progressives need to fight the tendency to make the perfect the enemy of the good.

The myths of growth

Hirshberg said the earth has been subsidizing our economy through society’s exploitation of its natural resources.

“Externalities,” a term that economists use to describe side effects or consequences of commercial activity that is not reflected in the cost of goods and services involved, blinds the public to the flaws in the current economy, he said.

Under this definition, the direct outcomes of the current industrialized food system — such as obesity, climate change, and diabetes — do not exist, because their cost is not part of the price we pay for food at the grocery store.

He said people need to understand that inexpensive food is not cheap and that one’s neighbors — or the environment itself — are paying these costs somehow.

Then there is the myth that water as a completely renewable resource.

Hirshberg called water “the oil of the 21st century,” adding that most of the water loss in this country happens through unsustainable agricultural irrigation practices.

But, the most serious issue facing industrial agriculture, said Hirshberg, is toxification.

For 70 years, he said, U.S. farmers have been on a spree, using unproven chemicals in the agricultural process.

He also took aim at genetically modified organisms (GMOs), saying that despite 30 years of progress in the organic food industry, policymakers have “drunk the Kool-Aid,” believing GMO use must be deregulated in order to feed the world.

Yet large agricultural companies, such as Monsanto, fund research to get the results they want, he said.

They also have bought politicians and won power through Supreme Court decisions, such as the Citizens United case that upholds the rights of corporations to spend unlimited sums on money on political campaigns.

Hirshberg spoke of the conflict of interest that exists when a company such as Monsanto sells herbicides while making seeds for farmers.

“These genies don’t go back in the bottle,” said Hirshberg, adding 90 percent of all corn and soy grown in the United States comes from GMO seeds. Over time, he said, data shows that farmers end up needing to use more herbicides on GMO crops.

An alternative

Organic food practices, however, offer a different, healthier reality, said Hirshberg.

Stonyfield Farm buys an average of 50 million pounds of organic milk from Vermont, which equates to $14 million into the state’s economy.

Hirshberg said the farmers working with Stonyfield also earn 70 to 80 percent more for their milk than conventional farmers. Also, organic milk cows live twice as long on average as conventional milk cows.

Yet Stonyfield earns a better net margin than its larger, non-organic competitors.

Hirshberg said it’s possible to create an economic system where everyone gives and everyone wins. But, he cautioned, one of the issues the organic industry is up against now is the issue of scale.

For lower-income families, organic food costs too much and remains in the realm of the elite. This is why, he said, he sells to Walmart.

Hirshberg feels one of the ways to get everyone eating organic food is to increase the industry’s size to increase efficiencies.

Communities must also help fund farmers making the transition from conventional to organic. The shift can take as long as three years, and they can’t always sell their products during the transition.

Hirshberg also supports eliminating the “broken” federal subsidy system that many conventional farms benefit from. He also believes the country needs a national labeling law, because consumers should have the right to know if their food contains GMOs.

Politics

Americans, he said, have been spoiled into believing “that cheap food is a good thing.” However, most of what people call food isn’t food, he said — it’s a mix of bad ingredients and empty fillers that lead to health conditions such as obesity and diabetes.

The higher cost of organic products should not be an excuse for not providing people with nutritious and affordable food, he said.

But to make organic more affordable, Hirshberg believes, food produced by big agribusinesses must first be priced for what their products really cost — to eliminate the externalities.

Federal subsidies are ingrained with the cost of food, he said. For example, coal and oil companies receive government financial assistance, and therefore people do not pay the real price for these energy sources.

Removing the agricultural subsidies would level the playing field for organic food, because organic would cease to cost more compared to conventionally farmed food.

But whether or not subsidies are abolished, the scale of organic industry needs to grow, because with an increase in scale comes efficiencies, Hirshberg said.

For example, when Stonyfield picks up milk, having seven farms on one milk route saves the company more time and energy than going to just one farm.

Hirshberg estimates that if organic reached 4 percent of the total U.S. food sales, organic companies would see a 10 percent increase in efficiencies.

Hirshberg said that when considering the future of the organic food industry, people should look at the context of the American food industry as a whole.

“We have data on our side,” he said. “What we need now is the political clout.”

Under this definition, the direct outcomes of the current industrialized food system — such as obesity, climate change, and diabetes — do not exist, because their cost is not part of the price we pay for food at the grocery store.

He said people need to understand that inexpensive food is not cheap and that one’s neighbors — or the environment itself — are paying these costs somehow.

Hirshberg called water “the oil of the 21st century,” adding that most of the water loss in this country happens through unsustainable agricultural irrigation practices.

But, the most serious issue facing industrial agriculture, said Hirshberg, is toxification.

For 70 years, he said, U.S. farmers have been on a spree, using unproven chemicals in the agricultural process.

He also took aim at genetically modified organisms (GMOs), saying that despite 30 years of progress in the organic food industry, policymakers have “drunk the Kool-Aid,” believing GMO use must be deregulated in order to feed the world.

Yet large agricultural companies, such as Monsanto, fund research to get the results they want, he said.

They also have bought politicians and won power through Supreme Court decisions, such as the Citizens United case that upholds the rights of corporations to spend unlimited sums on money on political campaigns.

Hirshberg spoke of the conflict of interest that exists when a company such as Monsanto sells herbicides while making seeds for farmers.

“These genies don’t go back in the bottle,” said Hirshberg, adding 90 percent of all corn and soy grown in the United States comes from GMO seeds. Over time, he said, data shows that farmers end up needing to use more herbicides on GMO crops.

One responseSubscribe to comments

  1. Is a very good sense.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Stonyfield Farm CEO: Big isn’t necessarily bad in the world of ..."