Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

2 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Bringing more clean, CO2-free power from Hydro-Quebec is a great step in the right direction. A lot more would be even better.

    Bringing gas from Canada to Rutland is another great step in the right direction.

    To make the most efficient use of the gas, it should be used in combined-cycle, gas-turbine, CCGT, plants that have electrical efficiencies up to 60%.

    GE and Siemens provide turnkey plants up to 550 MW. Such plants have a very small foot print, something Vermonters really like.

    If such a plant is arranged for district heating (which is possible in Rutland), it can have an overall efficiency of 85%.

    Such district heating arrangements are widely used in Northern Europe which has a similar climate to Vermont. I lived in Holland, Norway and Germany for 26 years.

    http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/46252/thermal-solar-california-desert
    http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/46824/impact-csp-and-pv-solar-feed-tariffs-spain
    http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/46142/impact-pv-solar-feed-tariffs-germany
    http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/46652/reducing-energy-use-houses
    http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/47519/base-power-alternatives-replace-base-loaded-coal-plants
    http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/46977/impacts-variable-intermittent-power-grids
    http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/50167/impact-pv-solar-peak-electric-demands
    http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/50925/electric-vehicle-hoopla
    http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/51642/dutch-renewables-about-face-towards-nuclear

    1. to use natural gas for a district energy system would be a mistake

      every dollar spent for fuel would leave the state
      natural gas is a non-renewable resource
      natural gas is not “clean”
      Vermont needs distributed generation, not a 550 MW plant

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Story + video: Shumlin promises to bring high-speed rail, natural gas..."