Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

11 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Michael Moore’s comment after the shooting in Tucson and when the Sarah Palin’s map with tagets in gunsights was resurrected still resonates vividly with me. Moore said, “If a Mulsim in Detrot had put that map (Palin’s) out on the internet, think where he/she would be sitting today.” Of course…the FBI would have jailed that person! Be careful John McC. when we start with the “jokes” the actions are not far behind. Take it from a psychologist.

  2. Anne, I hope you will no longer publish John McLaughry’s commentaries. He’s gone too far and doesn’t understand the seriousness of the threat.

  3. This is a real low for Vermont politics.

    1. Dan is correct…this a real low. Shame on John McClaughry.

  4. I’m sure John thinks he’s quite a wit……and, of course, he’s half right.

  5. It actually does not surprise me that McClaughry would have said this, joke or otherwise. It is the only thing that he has left, now that the policies he so constantly ridicules have turned up as empty as they were all along. I know it is a matter of free speech and all for running his columns, and Anne must wince every time they come at her, but he should be held responsible for his crass actions and words, like this example. You never know when some crazy could take them to heart and make a repeat of Tucson here in Vermont.

  6. Right-wing chatterboxes love to do this – aim threatening or violent language at a liberal/progressive and then claim, aw, c’mon guys, it was a joke. I wonder if McClaughry would think it’s so funny if somebody did that to him; for example, posting pictures of him with a target superimposed over his face and something like “this guy deserves to die” as a caption.

    Imagine the outrage from the Echo Chamber if some basket case who obtained a gun popped off Glenn Beck or Limbaugh or somebody. It would be open season on us.

    I grew up on the Right, in the lower Midwest about halfway between where McClaughry and Limbaugh were raised. I owned guns. I was an ROTC cadet and vice-president of my college Republicans. I’m more than familiar with the violent language that is common over there. (And the racism as well, I should add.) I also know that behind the joking is a deeply-embedded, John-Wayne-chip-on-the-shoulder attitude that narrows the gap between the jokes and tragedy.

    Make no mistake, the steady drumbeat of extreme rhetoric from the Right helps create an atmosphere of permission for violence. VT Digger has pointed out the case of scholar and poverty activist Frances Fox Piven, who now fears for her life as a result of Glenn Beck’s unhinged tirades. The Crooks and Liars blog has a disturbing map of incidents since 2008 – http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/violence-directed-liberal-and-govern.

    Let’s go out on a limb and grant McClaughry was “joking.” At the very least, in the current environment, that was incredibly stupid and potentially dangerous for James Moore.

  7. Let me add one point here, in light of Mr. Carpenter’s raising of the freedom-of-speech consideration. Speech that incites violence or panic does not, traditionally, enjoy the same level of protection as other speech.

    Harken back to Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s famous observation in Schenck v. United States, that “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic . . . . The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.”

    “Joking,” if it is that, when spoken or written in an atmosphere where political violence – an example, I would submit, of “substantive evil” – is becoming increasingly common, is irresponsible.

  8. At least McLaughery wasn’t trying to raise money off dead people like Bernie did.

    1. Apparently, though, he wouldn’t mind creating more dead people.

  9. Ethan Allen was someone who served Vermont when all were well connected to the land. The EAI website lists ten people as its “staff & directors.” All are listed as academics, lawyers, and corporate puff men. Not one lists his profession as a farmer, nor any other trade involving real work for a living. All McClaughry ever talks about (if what he’s saying is at all comprehensible) is how we must grease the skids for business and the wealthy, and reduce taxes on same (which shifts the burden onto all the rest of us).

    I believe that if Ethan Allen were alive in the twenty-first century, he’d rebel against the elite now, as he rebelled against the elite of his day. If that were the case, one of the people you’d likely find in Ethan Allen’s “map of crosshairs” would be the VP of the organization which co-opted his name.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Digger Tidbits: McClaughry “joke” goes awry; Video Shumlin presse..."