Montpelier 2/4/2012
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 04, 2012
Partly Cloudy
27°/7°

Run of Site Leaderboard

Primmer Piper Eggleston & Cramer banner.

Video: Reardon, Trautz give budget adjustment overview

1 Response Email Email Print Print

The Douglas administration is asking for $16.4 million in budget changes for fiscal year 2010 (July 1 2009-June 30, 2010). The House Committee on Appropriations has been taking testimony this week from agency secretaries about the budget changes, which include $2.6 million for 118 additional out-of-state beds for an unanticipated increase in the number of Vermont inmates, the elimination of $408,700 in grants for municipal planning and $965,000 in additional costs for the Retirement Health Insurance system.
Jim Reardon, Commissioner of the Department of Finance and Management, said in a speech on Tuesday that the budget adjustments do not represent significant “policy changes” or “expenditure reductions.”
Throughout the three days of hearings held at the Statehouse, lawmakers and administration officials have alluded to the fiscal challenges of next year’s budget. The Joint Fiscal Office reports that the state budget gap could be between $141 million and $160 million.
Chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee, Martha Heath, D-Westford, remarked on Tuesday after Reardon’s speech, “I’ve never seen (the budget adjustment bill) on my desk this early and I really appreciate it. It will give us a leg up toward getting these out of the way and move on to 2011.”
Vtdigger.org is attending the hearings and will provide more video clips of agency testimony and of Reardon’s speech on the deficit Vermont faces in 2011 later today.
Video clips from Tuesday of Reardon’s speech and testimony from the budget and management director, Otto Trautz, follow.

One responseSubscribe to comments

  1. SM Coniff

    When describing the cranky budget, it sounds like every classified State Employee…melting down under the strain of covering for the loss of multiple staff and with no dollars to do so, while having the Governor continue to tell the world what terrible Vermonters we all are…

Leave a Reply

* Copy this password:

* Type or paste password here:

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don’t accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don’t support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn’t a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.