Commentary

Jack Hoffman: Essential workers need a living wage

Editor’s note: This commentary is by Jack Hoffman, who is a senior analyst at Public Assets Institute.

The $2.2 trillion federal stimulus bill will keep the wolf from the door for millions of people who can’t work and businesses forced to close because of the coronavirus pandemic — at least for a while. Congress rightly recognized its first priority is to see that people with no money coming in have enough to live on.

Now we must do the same for those who are still working.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act targets aid to individuals through changes to the unemployment insurance system and through direct payments. There are a lot of fine-print details around the unemployment changes. But the main provisions are:

·      $600 a week in federal unemployment compensation, to be paid on top of state unemployment benefits through July 31.

·      A 13-week extension of state unemployment benefits for those who exhaust their regular 26 weeks of compensation.

·      Expansion of unemployment insurance to temporarily cover many people who do not qualify for benefits under the regular program, such as people who are self-employed or independent contractors.

·      Federal support for a work-sharing option — known as “short-time compensation” — that allows employers to retain workers through a combination of reduced hours and partial unemployment benefits.

The direct payments will be one-time checks or direct deposits of $1,200 for each adult and $500 for each child. More than 80% of households are expected to receive the payments — single taxpayers with incomes up to $75,000 and couples with incomes up to $150,000. The plan is to make the direct-deposit payments in the next few weeks.

VTDigger is underwritten by:

Already there has been grumbling that some workers  — those making minimum wage, for example — will get more in unemployment compensation than they were making when they were working. These complaints miss the purpose of the CARES Act, which is less of a stimulus and more economic anti-freeze. People who are being directed to stay home need to eat, pay the rent or mortgage, make car payments, pay utility bills, buy prescriptions, and maybe see a doctor. Just because some workers couldn’t afford all of those things on a minimum wage job is no reason to deny them money to live on for the next four months.

We should think of this as paying people to stay home during a pandemic, which will help save our own lives.

And now we also need to turn our efforts to the people who are continuing to work in grocery stores, pharmacies, hospitals and doctors’ offices, and scores of public jobs. They won’t get federal unemployment compensation because they’re still doing essential work. They will receive the one-time payment, which will be a help. But we also need to make sure that they, too, are paid enough to live on and support their families during this crisis.

Sometime soon, Vermont’s minimum wage needs to ensure that all workers have a livable income. In the meantime, Vermont needs to set a livable, minimum wage for essential workers, possibly with state assistance, including school, municipal, and county employees, and perhaps others. They, also, deserve help from the rest of us to get through this pandemic.

VTDigger serves a vital role in delivering news that changes the terms of many debates. Digger reporters engage us, enlighten us and offer "real eye openers" about issues of the day.

Crea Lintilhac, VJT Board Member


Commentary

About Commentaries

VTDigger.org publishes 12 to 18 commentaries a week from a broad range of community sources. All commentaries must include the author’s first and last name, town of residence and a brief biography, including affiliations with political parties, lobbying or special interest groups. We have a minimum length of 400 words. We have found the ideal length is approximately 600 to 800 words. We provide some copyediting support, but we do not have the staff to fact-check commentaries. We reserve the right to reject opinions for matters of taste and accuracy. Commentaries are voices from the community and do not represent VTDigger in any way. Please send your commentary to Cate Chant, [email protected], and Anne Galloway, [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Reader Footnotes

Please help move our stories forward with information we can use in future articles.

Readers must submit actual first and last names and email addresses in order for notes to be approved. We are no longer requiring readers to submit user names and passwords.

We have a limit of 1,000 characters. We moderate every reader note.

Notes about other readers’ points of view will not be accepted. We will only publish notes responding to the story.

For more information, please see our guidelines. Please go to our FAQ for the full policy.

About voting: If you see voting totals jump when you vote on comments, this indicates that other readers have been voting at the same time.
VTDigger Reader Footnotes are now closed on this story.
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
 

Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Jack Hoffman: Essential workers need a living wage"