On military industrial complex, Sanders’ actions diverge from his rhetoric


In February 2011, Sen. Bernie Sanders visited the Afghan National Police Academy in Kabul as part of a congressional delegation visiting the NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan supported training site. Photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Ernesto Hernandez Fonte

On Sept. 4, 1985, then-Burlington Mayor Bernie Sanders held an impromptu press conference to announce that the city’s ambitious street and sidewalk upgrades were ahead of schedule.

After a few questions about Burlington street work, reporters turned to a more contentious topic: the recent arrest and imprisonment of Sanders’ former assistant city treasurer, Barr Swennerfelt. 

Earlier that year, more than 100 Vermonters had gathered in front of Burlington’s Federal Building on Elmwood Avenue to protest President Ronald Reagan’s interventionist military policy in Nicaragua. As part of the peace effort, three protesters, including Swennerfelt, scaled a fence at the General Electric plant in Burlington, just off Pine Street. According to an account by the Burlington Free Press, the protesters then “climbed atop a tank with Vulcan rapid-fire guns, and placed flowers in the barrels.”

“Guns produced at GE right now are killing people,’ Swennerfelt told the Free Press. 

Sanders agreed with the protesters in spirit. In an unusual step for a mayor, Sanders had visited Nicaragua that summer to attend ceremonies marking the sixth anniversary of the Sandinista revolution that put anti-imperialist President Daniel Ortega in power. In El Salvador, U.S.-backed forces reportedly used helicopters equipped with guns made at GE. Yet Sanders took a hard line against the local protesters, and declined to criticize GE, one of the city’s biggest employers with a strong union and good-paying jobs.

Burlington police were dispatched to break up the protests, and some, including Swennerfelt, were arrested. Now 72, Swennerfelt told VTDigger that, in the wake of the protest, Sanders had demanded she pledge to cease any activism if she wanted to remain in his administration. 

“I’m a Quaker, and had been led to these actions, which were part of a spiritual peace group,” Swennerfelt explained. “I told Bernie I couldn’t promise that, so I left my job.”

Swennerfelt was behind bars for a month or so, and was released from prison shortly before the 1985 road-paving press conference, and reporters pressed Sanders on whether his actions towards her had betrayed his own deeply held political beliefs. 

VTDigger is underwritten by:

One reporter asked Sanders whether there “may have been a contradiction on your part as someone … who talks a lot about peace and justice and yet not supporting someone who acts on it.”

“Barr is entitled to her view,” Sanders said, before defending her arrest by police as the “appropriate thing to do.” He further insisted that his administration was waging a “fight for a peaceful world and for economic justice.” Then he abruptly ended the press conference and walked away.

The incident typified Sanders’ long-held attitude to the military. While the Vermont senator routinely rips on Pentagon spending and major defense contractors, insisting in campaign speeches that “we need to take on the military industrial complex,” he has held his fire on several defense projects inside the state’s borders.

Over his decades-long political career, Sanders has helped secure millions in federal grants for the GE Aviation plant in Rutland and wooed a Lockheed Martin solar research center to Burlington. Tens of millions of dollars worth of additional military earmarks were secured through Sanders’ quiet congressional work. 


One of four F-35 fighter jets parked at the Vermont Air National Guard base at the Burlington International Airport on May 29. The jets were diverted from an overseas flight for refueling and because of weather and were at the airport for a few days. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

He has also stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the state’s political leaders as a stalwart supporter of the Vermont National Guard and its controversial and troubled new plane, the F-35 fighter jet. The first two of those planes are expected to touch down at Burlington International Airport this month, despite strong opposition from community leaders and local activists.

“The military is a very complex issue for Bernie,” said Garrison Nelson, a political science professor emeritus at the University of Vermont who has known Sanders for 40 years. “It’s not an issue he’s comfortable with because of all the pressure he gets from the hard lefties. He can’t antagonize this core progressive base, but must also not come off as radical, which could scare people away.”

Nelson joked that Sanders’ support of the F-35 was directed “almost at the point of a gun”–  essentially all but mandated once the two other members of Vermont’s congressional delegation came out in favor of the planes. “If the F-35 wasn’t on the agenda he’d be a lot happier not do this juggling act,” Nelson added. 

Swennerfelt, who has long supported Sanders, said the commonly held assumption of him as a protester or peacenik is a media misconception. “It isn’t Bernie’s bailiwick to go out, hold a sign, and get arrested,” she said. “Bernie believes in the military. He’s not a pacifist.”

Sanders did declare himself a pacifist when he applied for (and was later denied) conscientious objector status during the Vietnam War. And when it comes to big picture military policy, Sanders has long prioritized economic sanctions and diplomacy over war, with a few high profile exceptions. 

In a recent story examining Sanders’ foreign policy record, VTDigger reported that the Vermont senator was one of the few federal lawmakers who voted against the Persian Gulf War in 1991, but supported a NATO air campaign in Yugoslavia in 1999 to stop human rights abuses in Kosovo. He voted against the Iraq War resolution in 2002, but supported military action in Afghanistan the year before to track down the terrorists responsible for 9/11. 

Sanders declined to speak with VTDigger for this story.

While Sanders is generally opposed to war, he appears to hold a fundamental appreciation for the strong benefits of a military job, and has pointed to two benefits in particular that he’d like to see extended to the general public — free college and socialized medicine — which already exist for the military community in the form of the G.I. Bill and the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Sanders, a former chairman of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, has sought to further strengthen these and other military benefits in office. In 2008, Sanders was a co-sponsor of the Post 9/11 G.I. bill, which expanded college benefits and housing stipends for those who served. In 2014, he was a key player in killing congressional efforts to slash military pensions, and he’s authored legislation aimed at strengthening the Department of Veterans Affairs and securing new health benefits, including dental care, for veterans. 

This work has earned Sanders numerous awards from veterans’ service organization and, in a 2016 Military Times poll, he was the most popular Democrat among active duty service members. 

VTDigger is underwritten by:

Sanders is also popular with employees of the military industrial complex. According to a VTDigger analysis of federal campaign data, Sanders received more than $850,000 during his 2016 presidential campaign from employees of the 50 largest military contractors, though many came in amounts under $1,000. (So far this cycle, Sanders has taken in more than $31,000 from employees of this same group of defense companies.) 

Separately, over the course of his congressional career, Sanders has received more than $85,000 in political donations from the four major contractors working on the F-35: Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, BAE Systems and United Technologies. 

Moreover, Sanders’ former Senate chief of staff and senior 2016 campaign adviser, Michaeleen Earle Crowell, recently signed up as a lobbyist for Boeing, according to federal lobbying disclosures. Her work has included pushing for “funding for the F15X,” a fighter jet manufactured by the mammoth defense company. Sanders has not taken a public position on the F-15, and a spokesman for the senator said, per congressional ethics rules, no staffer has spoken to Crowell about Boeing. 


Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., tours the Afghan National Police Academy with military leaders on Feb. 20, 2011. Photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Ernesto Hernandez Fonte

Shortly before kicking off his first presidential campaign, in May 2014, Sanders was interviewed by John Nichols, a progressive columnist at The Nation magazine, before a generally friendly crowd in Northampton, Massachusetts.

However, near the end of the event, during a question-and-answer session, one attendee challenged the Vermont senator’s support for the F-35.

“In Burlington, there’s a lot of good people working hard to stop basing the F-35 — this is the military industrial complex at its strongest and you came out in favor of basing it there,” the questioner noted. 

“The F-35 is the cutting edge plane, the fighter plane for the United State Air Force, Navy, and NATO,” Sanders retorted. “That’s a fact, do you deny that?” 

After the questioner appeared to raise some of the plane’s significant safety concerns, Sanders interrupted him.“You may think it doesn’t work, but the Department of Defense does think it works.” Sanders then reverted to his longtime view on military projects: the economic benefits derived from the project outweigh any drawbacks.

“It employs hundreds of people, it provides a college education for hundreds of people,” Sanders said. “So for me, the question is not whether we have the F-35 or not: it is here. The question for me is whether it is located in Burlington, Vermont, or whether it is located in Florida.” 

Ironically, when a small Florida community was faced with the basing of the F-35, a torrent of grassroots political action resulted in the Air Force making significant concessions to the community, including a drastic reduction in plane operations.

No F-35 nuclear bombers banner

Activists opposing the Burlington F-35 basing, which Bernie Sanders has supported, protest outside the senator’s campaign rally in Montpelier in May. Photo by Mike Dougherty/VTDigger

Opponents have raised concerns about the plane’s safety for years. The most recent problems were documented in a June multi-part series by Defense News

Defense News found the version of plane coming to Vermont — the F-35A — risks losing both of its hydraulic brake lines when a tire is blown upon landing. Pilots have also faced obstructed views when flying at night with below-average levels of starlight. 

There are also plane problems that don’t jibe with Vermont’s cold winter climate. The plane has faced battery failings in cold conditions. Its Engine Ice Protection System has also been found to be faulty. Facing problems, the military appears to have abandoned the de-icing program altogether, instead, “changing the technical orders to require pilots to shut down the aircraft if icing conditions are encountered on the ground.”

In an unprecedented move, the F-35 development and production phases are being conducted simultaneously, and some early F-35 shipments have been halted after serious concerns were identified. While the Government Accountability Office has advised that all of the F-35’s serious problems should be remediated before full-rate production is achieved later this year, no such action has taken place. (The planes coming to Vermont were built before this important metric is achieved.)

Vermont’s three-member congressional delegation has expressed no serious concerns or misgivings about their unified support of the basing despite Burlington’s shorter-than-average runway smack dab in the most densely populated part of the state.

Over the last year-and-a-half, as VTDigger has detailed significant health and safety concerns related to the plane’s impending basing, provided evidence that the selection process was improperly manipulated by political actors, and revealed a toxic culture of sexual misconduct in the Guard largely led by fighter jet pilots, Sanders has consistently declined to speak on these issues with the press, or the public.

Local stakeholders have found this unresponsiveness, which dates back many years, frustrating. 

rosanne greco and burlington police

Rosanne Greco said after her arrest Monday for refusing to leave Sen. Patrick Leahy’s Burlington office in protest of the basing of the F-35 fighter jet in Vermont that she would be willing to get arrested again. Photo by Mike Dougherty/VTDigger

Retired Air Force Col. Rosanne Greco, a longtime opponent of the F-35, recalled inviting all three members of Vermont’s congressional delegation to public forums and meetings on the potential basing as far back as 2012, when she was the chair of the South Burlington City Council. 

“Neither them nor any of their staff ever showed up,” Greco said. “It was especially odd for Bernie, who has always appeared to be on the side of the common folks and against the one percent. But here he stands with the military, and his own people are being shafted. He says he’s a man of the people, but he won’t talk to the people.”

Helen Riehle, the current chair of the South Burlington City Council, echoed Greco’s frustration.

“Our concerns seem to fall on deaf ears with the congressional delegation,” Riehle said.

She added: “It’s really quite surprising, because the basing disproportionately affects people of color, new Americans, low and working class residents,” Riehle said. “Bernie – all three of them, really — have been vocal about how important those constituencies are to the economy and to this state. For them to decide that the F-35 has to come, that there couldn’t be another mission for the Guard in Burlington that would also support our economy is mind-boggling.”

“Every state is required to have a National Guard,” Riehle concluded. “Our is not going to go away.”  

A Sanders adviser who asked not to be identified insisted: “We have gone pretty far out of our way to meet with anyone who has thoughts or concerns around the F-35.” 

While some plane supporters view their opponents as a small group of chronic protesters, the have produced identifiable results — the three cities most impacted by the planes have repeatedly passed resolutions in opposition. They have protested in political offices, conducted civil disobedience, and organized a comment-writing campaign during the Air Force’s environment assessment. Just this week, Greco was arrested after protesting at the Burlington office of U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy.

Earlier this year, the Vermont Senate passed a resolution in opposition to nuclear systems being based in Vermont; last month the Burlington City Council unanimously passed a similar resolution. (While the F-35 is nuclear capable, Sanders and other lawmakers have strenuously suggested that Vermonters need not worry about Vermont’s fleet taking up such arms.)

In recent weeks, after new noise maps were released that showed a tripling of homes impacted by dangerous F-35 noise, at least three new groups opposed to the planes have sprung up, and are planning multiple protests in the coming weeks. 


Ben Cohen

Ben Cohen was arrested for broadcasting a simulation of the sound of F-35 fighter jets from a set of speakers through the city in Feburary 2018. The roar violated the city’s noise ordinance. Photo by Caleigh Cross/Stowe Reporter

Even some of Sanders’ top allies in the state have joined these efforts. Both ice cream magnate Ben Cohen, who is one of Sanders’ 2020 campaign co-chairs, and noted environmentalist Bill McKibben, a frequent Sanders surrogate, recently signed on to a group, led by Greco, that’s fighting against the planes. (Ironically enough, Sanders’ likeness was used in a pro-plane pamphlet created by the Green Ribbons for the F-35, a citizens group that supports the F-35 basing.)

Out of Sanders’ allies, Cohen has been most involved in this activism, bankrolling research, media and protest work. Last year he was arrested after blasting the sound of jet noise in downtown Burlington.  During the last legislative session, he successfully lobbied on the Senate resolution opposed to nuclear bombers

Cohen and Sanders have discussed the planes periodically over the years, but Cohen says he hasn’t been able to sway Sanders.

Cohen said he’s talked to his friend about the issue a few times, but to no avail. “That’s one thing he and I do not agree on,” he said. “And anytime I can find a politician with whom I agree 98 or 99 percent of the time, I’ll take that.”

It’s hard to track down exactly why Sanders has so vociferously supported the F-35, but it appears partially informed by the 1993 closing of Plattsburgh, New York’s Air Force base, formerly located on the western end of Lake Champlain. A Sanders adviser noted that the closing “had a significant negative impact on Plattsburgh as a city. Bernie saw that very real impact.”

In response, while he has repeatedly criticized military spending and weapons projects, Sanders has decoupled these issue from the F-35 — the biggest financial boondoggle in Pentagon history — as well as other defense projects with a Vermont connection. 

As a House member in the mid-’90s, Sanders called out Lockheed Martin’s issuance of $92 billion in executive bonuses shortly after the company announced thousands of layoffs. Sanders tried to stop these bonuses through legislation, but was unsuccessful. In 2011, Sanders’ Senate office found that $300 billion was funneled over a three-year period to Pentagon contractors who had been convicted of fraud. Last year, when Congress passed a historically large Pentagon budget, Sanders was one of just 10 senators to vote against it. 

Sanders has pledged to shrink the military budget if elected president, but, in an interview this year with Vox, would not commit to shutting down government or vetoing a Congressional budget should he be presented with a boosted defense budget. 

Yet in 2014, when then-Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel sought to shrink the size of the National Guard, Sanders joined Vermont’s political class in opposing the cuts.  

“The Guard already makes up nearly half of the Army’s combat personnel and more than a third of that of the Air Force, but accounts for just seven percent of the total defense budget,” Sanders said in a statement at the time. “To my mind, we should be growing – rather than shrinking – the National Guard.” 

Most announcements on defense grants for Vermont have come from Sanders’ Senate counterpart, Patrick Leahy, who has long served on the Senate Appropriations Committee. Yet even early in his Senate career, before so-called earmarks were banned, Sanders quietly worked to secure millions in military money for his state.

Between 2008 and 2011, Sanders helped secure more than $74 million for military and defense projects in Vermont, far more than he earmarked for types of work he prioritizes in his rhetoric, like education or the environment. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, this work included everything from $1.6 million for Darn Tough to produce socks for the Marines Corps to more than $10 million to improve the Guard’s military firing range. 

Sanders cuts yellow ribbon with big scissors

In October 2011, Former Adjutant Gen. Michael Dubie, Sanders, Wing Commander Col. Douglas Fick and Ken Pigeon, president of Engineers Construction, cut the ribbon for a Vermont Air National Guard solar power project. Photo by Tech. Sgt. Dan DiPietro

Sanders’ most public work to woo defense contractors occurred in 2011, when he helped bring a firm]managed by Lockheed Martin to Burlington. While the project was for solar energy, it rubbed some of Vermont’s lefties the wrong way, and violated the spirit of a recently passed Burlington City Council resolution that called for the city not to work with weapons producers or environmental polluters. Greg Guma, the former editor of the Vanguard Press,
chronicled the development on his blog:

Despite concerns about Lockheed’s consistently bad behavior Sanders didn’t think inviting a subsidiary to the state would help them get away with anything. Rather, he envisioned Vermont transformed “into a real-world lab for the entire nation” through a strategic public-private partnership. “We’re at the beginning of something that could be of extraordinary significance to Vermont and the rest of the country,” he predicted.

This dissonance is not uncommon in politics, as Sanders made note of in a classroom discussion at the University of Iowa a few months after his talk in Northampton. In his remarks, Sanders openly suggested that politicians improperly refrain from criticizing some military contractors because of the jobs these companies produce back home.

“Any member of Congress that stands up and says, ‘Well, maybe we don’t have to spend $600 billion on the military,’ they get letters from people working in the military industry in their own state,” Sanders said.

While he has been tagged as disingenuous for his simultaneous support of peace and the Vermont National Guard, Sanders has suffused progressive policies into his advocacy for military.

In 2008, Sanders ventured to Nellis Air Force Base in Las Vegas, which then boasted the largest solar array in the country. The Vermont senator subsequently spoke to Pentagon officials about making the military more energy efficient, and helped secure more than $8 million for Vermont to create one of the largest solar power projects on any National Guard base. This project led the Vermont Guard to win a national award from Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). 

Sanders’ office has continued to advise and support the Guard on energy-saving projects, including its newly revamped maintenance shop, which was built with a state-of-the-art energy management system. 

Sanders has also fought for better benefits for military members. Virtually all of the 39 bills Sanders has introduced relating to the military have been aimed at expanding or strengthening healthcare inside the Department of Veterans Affairs. Perhaps his most significant legislation to date is the 2014 VA Choice Act, which strengthened capacity at the VA while also opening up more private health care options to veterans.


VA Choice Act Sanders

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., receives the Veterans of Foreign Wars Congressional Award during a 2015 ceremony. Photo courtesy of Sanders’ office

This law, forged with late Republican Sen. John McCain, came in the wake of a scandal at a VA hospital in Phoenix in which administrators were doctoring wait-time data to make it appear as if veterans were accessing care much faster than was the case. Sanders was criticized for defending the VA in the wake of this scandal, and of being blind to the department’s significant problems. In countering this criticism, Sanders has pointed to Republicans’ longtime unwillingness to get on board with his comprehensive VA proposals, which he had introduced in the years before the scandal, to tepid support. (As VTDigger previously reported, the VA Choice Act created new problems for veterans across the country while doing little to ease longstanding concerns inside the agency.)

Sanders also worked earnestly to establish and support a family support network inside the Vermont National Guard that was hailed in the press as “a national model.” The web of programs includes everything proactive mental health and wellness outreach to free child care services.

Shortly after the invasion of Iraq, in 2004, Sanders attended a holiday party held for Vermont National Guard families that was hosted by the Pomerleau family, one of the largest developers in Chittenden County. Following a round of holiday tunes, Sanders spoke to the crowd, and pledged support and assistance.

It was classic Sanders: opposing war but supporting the soldier. 

“We know that a lot of families are hurting right now, especially at this time of the year,” Sanders began. “I think I can speak for the entire delegation when I say we are going to do everything we can in Washington to make sure the men and women over there have the equipment and the training that they need — that we’re going to bring them as soon as possible and as safely as possible. And while they are over there, we’re going to do our best to make sure that the kids and the wives back home are never forgotten, not for one single day.”

Missing out on the latest scoop? Sign up here to get a weekly email with all of VTDigger's reporting on politics. And in case you can't get enough of the Statehouse, sign up for Final Reading for a rundown on the day's news in the Legislature.


VTDigger's reporting on COVID-19 is going to be very important in coming weeks. If you rely on it, please donate here.

Jasper Craven

About Jasper

Jasper Craven is a freelance reporter for VTDigger.

A Vermont native, he first discovered his love for journalism at the Caledonian Record. He double-majored in print journalism and political science at Boston University, and worked in the Boston Globe’s Metro and Investigative units. While at the Globe he collaborated on Shadow Campus, a three-part investigative series focused on greed and mismanagement in Boston’s off-campus student housing market. The series was a finalist for the 2015 Pulitzer Prize.
He also spent two years at MuckRock, a news site dedicated to investigation and analysis of government documents. 

Craven covered Vermont’s U.S. congressional delegation for the Times Argus in the summer of 2014, and worked as a Metro reporter for the Chicago Tribune before joining the staff of VTDigger from 2015-2017.

Email: [email protected]

Follow Jasper on Twitter @Jasper_Craven

Reader Footnotes

Please help move our stories forward with information we can use in future articles.

Readers must submit actual first and last names and email addresses in order for notes to be approved. We are no longer requiring readers to submit user names and passwords.

We have a limit of 1,000 characters. We moderate every reader note.

Notes about other readers’ points of view will not be accepted. We will only publish notes responding to the story.

For more information, please see our guidelines. Please go to our FAQ for the full policy.

About voting: If you see voting totals jump when you vote on comments, this indicates that other readers have been voting at the same time.
19 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
18 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
roger tubby

Thank you Jasper for keeping the spotlight on the effect of money on our elected representatives.

The common response from the supporters of this boondoggle is that it creates/saves jobs. Yes, there may be a few more or less because of stationing the F-35 in Burlington. I doubt there has been a rigorous independent study of how many.

I do believe that none of the fiercest wealthy and politically-connected supporters live within 5 miles of BTV. Maybe they should volunteer to live in that expanded after-burner noise zone for a few years with their young children/grandchildren.

Steven Schlussel

Bernie is the best answer we have right now. Who doesn’t have contradictions in their life? Who doesn’t change their plans.?


……….”Sanders declined to speak with VTDigger for this story.”………That say’s it all!

Deb Bouton

Another excellent piece of reporting by Jasper Craven. THANK YOU for diving deeply into this topic. Bernie’s hypocrisy on the F-35 in particular is unfathomable and reason enough for me to withhold my vote, forever.

George Cross

The United States Air Force after careful study and consideration stated in its Environmental Impact Statement;

‘“With 18 (the number of F-35s designated for BTV) planes there will be no increase in jobs and with 24 planes there would be an increase of 266 military personnel primarily comprised of part-time traditional guardsmen…  Any increase in secondary employment as a result of the increase in personnel would be minor…”

Let’s read that again, “no increase in jobs.” Thus anyone, including Senator Sanders and Senator Leahy, as well as others, either refuse to believe the USAF or simply play loose with the truth for political purposes. There can be no other explanation for their claim of jobs, jobs, jobs.

rosemarie jackowski

Manufacturing weapons of mass destruction can never be justified as a ‘jobs program’.

Lockheed Martin won. The human race lost.

Tiffany Summers

Politics! Hypocrisy. Welcome to America is 2019

sandra bettis

“He can’t antagonize this core progressive base, but must also not come off as radical, which could scare people away.” Bernie, the ‘radical’ left is your base – please live up to our expectations – you will not scare any of your supporters away – in fact, you will energize us in your support.

Patrick Cashman

“…free college and socialized medicine — which already exist for the military community in the form of the G.I. Bill and the Department of Veterans Affairs. ”

Uh, no.
The GI Bill is a hiring and retention incentive. It provides funding for education and housing, paying tuition up to the resident tuition rate for 36 months. The cost is one Honorable Discharge. It is hardly “free”.

The VA does not serve the military. The VA serves private citizens who are Veterans for injuries and disabilities that result from their service. Military members are served by Tricare. Which is socialized medicine in a way, but with a crucial difference: instead of covering everyone, if you have negative habits (drugs, obesity, alcoholism) or chronic illness or long term injury,you are kicked out.

william Farr

After reading this quite long story on Bernie Sanders political leanings, I am left with the opinion that VTDigger is apparently pro Bernie or at least the reporter is. What this bit of historical political history tells me is Mr Sanders is quite the ” HAWK ” & not that much different from his least favorite political ” HAWK, ” Hillary Clinton. In fact I will go so far as to say he is playing her playbook to a tee… Which may help to explain why VT’s left leaning liberal electorate repeatably vote him back into office, year in, year out…
Thank you & have a nice day… :~)

Karen McIlveen1

Jasper you are the bomb! People who blindly worship political figures get what they deserve. Keep up the digging the manure pile is very deep and stinky in VT.

John Greenberg

This otherwise excellent article leaves out a pretty vital piece of the picture. As noted here, Bernie often supports the military industrial complex and specifically endorses the F-35. At the same time, the article fails to mention Bernie’s repeated claims about the need to address climate change.

The US military is one of the world’s largest creators of greenhouse gases and other environmental p0llution, as are all the others in the world. Interestingly, at various times and to its credit, the military itself has recognized its own outsize contribution and the urgency of the problems it has created.

By far the easiest way to combat greenhouse gases is to stop creating them. By supporting the F-35, for example, Sanders is directly contradicting his support for addressing global warming. This makes no more sense than supporting fossil fuel development to address global warming. They are not compatible positions.

sandra baird

Senator Sanders stance to support the F35’s is horrifying. Beyond the thousands of affordable housing that will be destroyed, beyond the tax increases that will be imposed on us to pay for the mitigation of the noise of war, beyond the possibility of nukes in our neighborhoods which will make us a target of war, the F35’s will spew more poisonous emissions into the environment than any other cause.
However, I will support Sen Sanders at this moment. Sanders alone is capable of owning up to his errors and changing his mind. We know that in Burlington. When he was defeated in a vote against his plans to develop the waterfront he went on to fight in court for the Public Trust doctrine to keep the waterfront public; lately, he has changed his silence and has criticized the government of Israel for its treatment of the Palestinians a difficult position for any politician.
He alone might change his position on the F35’s . A tiny but not zero hope.

Andrew Christiansen

Perhaps a better question to ask is why the military-industrial complex has such a hold on ALL politicians of every party? I would be curious to know if there is ANY U.S. Representative or Senator who hasn’t supported military projects and bases in their own state. A quick look at Elizabeth Warren shows https://www.politico.com/story/2015/02/elizabeth-warren-defense-massachusetts-115157 and a story similar to this one (just change the name from Bernie to Warren) appears here – https://www.mintpressnews.com/shes-hot-and-shes-cold-elizabeth-warren-and-the-military-industrial-complex/253542/

Robert Kenney

Getting personal flights on a UH-60 Blackhawk creates a whole lotta carbon emissions. Plus it cost taxpayers about $3500 an hour for the flight operation.

Kasey Child

Fantastic article by Jasper. Unless I missed it, I think the nearly trillion dollar price tag of the F-35 is extremely relevant to the discussion. Avoiding exorbitant military price tags like a trillion dollars for the F-35 are perfect examples of how progressives could justify their proposed social programs. Except for Bernie, I forgot he has been advocating for this endless military spending on developing a new plane.

Bernie truly is a complicated, contradictory figure.

Hale Irwin

I see Bernie as an angry old man without leadership qualities. His words are not mirrored by his actions. Has Bernie become the Left wing reflection of our Right wing President? Alike in many ways except political views.

John Briggs

Bernie is always right, much like what’s his name in the White House. And, like that man, he dislikes and reviles the press, which never manages to accurately describe his greatness. Difficult questions, as about the F-35, irritate him.
Like virtually every member of Congress, Sanders bleats concern for bloated budgets, but throughout his career he has not managed any effective challenges to the Pentagon and the industries it supports (and supplies with lobbyists in the form of retired officers).
Thanks, Digger, for this story. Sanders expects a free pass in Vermont and usually gets it, though he doesn’t deserve it.

John Greenberg

Re the cross-border myth: “The best numbers we have suggest that about 45,000 Canadians left the country for medical care in 2015. (That’s all destinations, not just the US.) Meanwhile, about 250,000 Americans left the US for medical care abroad. And these numbers don’t even count the number of Americans who get their prescription drugs from overseas.

Overall, then, that’s about 0.13 percent of Canadians and 0.08 percent of Americans who flee their countries for health care. ” https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/02/americans-flee-america-overseas-health-care-just-canadians/

If you want a higher estimate, a right-wing Canadian think tank puts the number of Canadians at 52,513. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2016-08-03/canadians-increasingly-come-to-us-for-health-care


Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "On military industrial complex, Sanders’ actions diverge from his r..."