Vermont Yankee’s plan to send tainted water into river ‘on hold’

VERNON — Vermont Yankee administrators say they’re getting a stubborn groundwater intrusion problem under control and are no longer pursuing a proposal to discharge radioactive water into the Connecticut River.

While liquid continues to seep into the shut-down nuclear plant’s turbine building, that’s happening at a greatly reduced rate, spokesman Marty Cohn said.

So there is no current need to consider discharging the water, Cohn said. Vermont Yankee has been sending the contaminated liquid out of state by tanker truck for the past several months, but Cohn said the company is cutting back on those shipments.

“We had a plan, we implemented the plan, and the plan worked,” he said.

Vermont Yankee
Vermont Yankee initially dealt with water that leaked into the turbine building by collecting it in swimming pools. The company then switched to tanks. File photo

Entergy ceased power production at Vermont Yankee in December 2014, and administrators say they had a comprehensive water management plan for the Vernon site. But at some point, groundwater began leaching into the lower level of the turbine building at much greater rates than had been expected.

Due to its contact with the turbine building, the groundwater became contaminated with low levels of radioactivity, according to Entergy and federal officials.

The issue first came to light in a federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection report this year. Within weeks, photos submitted to VTDigger showed that some of the water was being stored in open, commercially available swimming pools — an NRC-approved measure that illustrated the severity of the problem.

Those pools were a short-term solution. Eventually, Entergy deployed a series of industrial-sized bladders and steel tanks to hold the water, and the company hired a contractor to begin shipping it to out-of-state disposal sites.

In June, officials disclosed that Entergy also was considering asking for state permission to discharge some of the water into the nearby Connecticut River. At the time, Entergy had begun sharing some analytical data with state regulators regarding contaminants in the water.

But the discharge proposal has stagnated over the past few months, said George Desch, deputy commissioner of environmental conservation.

Entergy has not “submitted any additional data or a formal request to discharge,” Desch said. “Consequently, we have not been reviewing the data that they submitted with respect to the intrusion water.”

Cohn confirmed the discharge discussion is “on hold.” One reason, he said, is that preliminary examinations of discharge permit protocols discouraged Entergy from pursuing the idea.

“It was getting to be too complicated, so we decided to continue shipping” the water, Cohn said.

Marty Cohn
Vermont Yankee spokesman Marty Cohn. File photo by Mike Faher/VTDigger

But more importantly, Cohn said, the water problem has abated. The rate of intrusion has dropped under 700 gallons a day — a big improvement, given that Entergy disclosed at a February meeting that it had seen influxes as high as 2,500 to 3,000 gallons daily.

Entergy has said it enlisted experts to advise on water control measures, and Cohn said those appear to be working. Simply sealing “a number of cracks” in the turbine building has helped, he added.

With flows decreasing and tanker shipments continuing, Entergy has been able to make a big dent in the amount of contaminated water stored on site. After shipping about 300,000 gallons off site, workers have emptied all water storage bladders and are planning to cut back from five storage tanks to one, Cohn said.

“What that means is that we’ve got a really good handle on our stored inventory,” he said.

As a result, Utah-based disposal contractor EnergySolutions is not sending as many trucks to Vermont Yankee these days. The company had been handling four 5,000-gallon shipments of Vermont Yankee water a week, but that has decreased to two a week and is expected to drop to one weekly shipment in September, Cohn said.

“By the end of this month, we will have caught up and will be cutting back on our shipments,” Cohn said.

That will save money. While Entergy has not released a total dollar figure for dealing with the groundwater intrusion problem, officials have said each tanker truckload costs about $20,000 — cash that comes from the plant’s decommissioning trust fund. Final cleanup of the idled plant won’t begin until the fund grows enough to cover the cost.

Entergy has been pursuing federal approval of a second water disposal contractor that could handle both intrusion water and so-called process water — liquid that had been used in plant operations. But there now appears to be less urgency behind that request.

“We still haven’t heard back from the NRC,” Cohn said. “But there’s no rush, and we’re not pushing.”

If you read us, please support us.

Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer.

We moderate every comment. Please go to our FAQ for the full policy.

Mike Faher

Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Vermont Yankee’s plan to send tainted water into river ‘on ho..."
  • James Hopf

    If you continue to treat trivial issues/risks and though they are significant, the public will look at your actions and conclude that the hazard is significant (e.g., with this water containing very low levels of radioactivity. If your packaging up the water and shipping it to a disposal site, it must be significantly hazardous (water which has merely seeped into the plant turbine building). Thus, these actions do not assuage public fears, but instead act to increase them. In many ways, the nuclear industry is its own worst enemy. (Of course, the govt. of VT is a die hard enemy as well, pure and simple. So, it could be such actions are to avoid an endless battle with the state.)

  • John McClaughry

    A really useful report would specify the type and level of radioactivity in the affected water and compare it to the levels in the Connecticut River above and below the plant. For what benefit are we requiring Entergy to take $20k four times a week out of the decom fund?
    Also, let’s have full disclosure: reporter Faher’s blood is contaminated with Potassium 40.