Environmental groups call on state to divest fossil fuel holdings

Rep. Kesha Ram, D-Burlington, joined climate activists at the Statehouse on Friday to call for fossil fuel divestment in the state's pension investment funds. Photo by John Herrick/VTDigger

Rep. Kesha Ram, D-Burlington, joined climate activists at the Statehouse on Friday to call for fossil fuel divestment in the state’s pension investment funds. Photo by John Herrick/VTDigger

The group 350vt.org and other citizen climate activists hosted a news conference at the Statehouse on Thursday to urge lawmakers to divest state pension holdings in fossil fuel companies.

Lawmakers have two proposals to divest the state’s pension funds from fossil fuels. H.271 and S.131 would require the Vermont Pension Investment Committee (VPIC) to divest from companies that extract, produce or refine fossil fuels.

“Vermont is investing in the fossil fuels that are at the root of climate change. At the same time, we are spending state dollars to combat it,” said Rep. Kesha Ram, D-Burlington, a sponsor of the House bill.

Both bills are in their respective committees on Government Operations. The House bill has more than two dozen sponsors.

Vermont’s economy, including the skiing, maple syrup and agricultural industries, could be harmed by climate change, she said.

“So the question is not how we can afford to divest from fossil fuels, but how can we afford not to?” she said.

As of Dec. 31, the Vermont Pension Investment Committee, which manages the retirement funds for state employees and teachers, had about $3.6 billion in assets, according to the treasurer’s office.

About $88 million of the state’s pension holdings are invested in the energy sector, which includes coal, oil and gas companies, the treasurer’s office said.

State Treasurer Beth Pearce proposed offering a fossil-free mutual fund investment option for state employees. The Vermont State Employees’ Retirement System Board of Trustees approved the plan this month, Pearce’s office said.

John Herrick

Leave a Reply

10 Comments on "Environmental groups call on state to divest fossil fuel holdings"


Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Kathy Nelson
2 years 10 months ago
What gives these people the right to attack the stability of the retirement system that hard working Vermonters have paid into for years? I don’t think a bunch of McKibbenite groupies have the faintest idea what their doing or talking about. It’s very doubtful that even one of them has divorced themselves from using any item that is manufactured from fossil fuels, from the dye in their chinese-made t-shirts (how did those get transported to the US store?) to the plastic in the glasses some of them, in the photo, are wearing. When the 350 cultists start practicing what they… Read more »
Char Kennedy
2 years 10 months ago

Once again 350.org is taking the right stand. Divesting in South Africa is how people from many places brought an end to Apartheid in South Africa. Divesting in fossil fuels is something we should all do. There are lots of other investments to make which do not destroy the life sustaining qualities of the earth that we all need for living to use our investments.

Glenn Thompson
2 years 10 months ago

Comparing Apartheid to Fossil Fuels as the example of divesting from Fossil Fuels is just plain silly. If one wishes to diverse from Fossil Fuels, then they should stop using them period! …including every single item made from fossil fuels.

Supposedly, this is just a partial list!


2 years 10 months ago
“Vermont’s economy, including the skiing, maple syrup and agricultural industries, could be harmed by climate change, she said.” Here is a video of VPIRG’s Ben Walsh testifying to House Energy & Natural Resources committee that eve if the entire US stopped emitting all CO2 tomorrow, the effect on the trajectory of climate change would be nil. http://youtu.be/2KIUIDTOrXs Here’s a video of Vermont Climate Scientist Allen Betts admitting that even under the best of circumstances (which we are not attaining) Vermont’s climate will be like that of Pennsylvania by the end of the century. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hE8jr1l5hg So, saying we’re divesting of fossil… Read more »
Paul Lorenzini
2 years 10 months ago

They are saving the planet by destroying peoples savings! What a bunch of heroes!

Jane Palmer
2 years 10 months ago
Whoa, whoa, whoa…I didn’t read anything about taking away people’s savings. I interpreted their suggestion to be that maybe it would be a good idea to take the money away from those industries that have been operating irresponsibly. From what I have read, the way things are looking…it would be wise to divest from fossil fuels anyway…regardless of whether or not you believe in climate change or not. There are other places to invest funds that would have a safer and more lucrative return. Why do people think that oil and gas are the only way to go? Maybe it’s… Read more »
Glenn Thompson
2 years 10 months ago
Jane Palmer states, “There are other places to invest funds that would have a safer and more lucrative return.” Jane, are you an investor??? Do you follow specific industries and sectors? Learn future trends of specific industries? Sure, there could be specific areas that *could* outperform fossil fuels investments, but more likely many sectors would not out perform fossil fuel industries since the projected worldwide demand for Fossil Fuels will continue to rise. FYI, my investment portfolios contains a % of Fossil Fuel companies because they are safe and pay a damn good dividend. On the other hand, I also… Read more »
Alex Prolman
2 years 10 months ago
There are many studies that now show divestment from fossil fuels does not hurt an average portfolio’s risk or return rates. This proposal will not put anyone’s pension at risk. (A few studies even show slightly better returns as a result of fossil fuel divestment.) I can provide links if folks are interested. Given that initial safeguard– “No, don’t worry, it will not jeopardize the stability of your investments” — the main reason to divest from fossil fuels is simple and powerful: Energy is a market dominated by political power more so than competition, and fossil fuel companies bully governments… Read more »
Kathy Blume
2 years 10 months ago
Thanks Alex. It’s not about destroying peoples’ savings at all. It’s just about shifting the investment portfolios away from the fossil fuel industry. No different than shifting investment portfolios away from companies which did business in apartheid-era South Africa. And, actually, when it comes to climate change, we do know what we’re talking about. And one of the things we know is that all the systems of our lives – such as food, transportation, manufacturing, energy, economy – are all completely dependent on fossil fuels. Which is why plastic glasses and t-shirts from China (for all of us) are so… Read more »
2 years 10 months ago

360 vtorg and Bill McKibbens are protesting against Vt.Gas , however it is OK to
destroy the Vermont Mountain Tops for Wind. Please refer to EPA stuidy and ruling
shortly on wood burning for heat. You might need natural gas or a candle in your window.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Environmental groups call on state to divest fossil fuel holdings"