Child-care workers collective bargaining bill sails through Senate committee

Sen. Dick McCormack, D-Windsor, listens in the Senate chamber on opening day. Photo by Roger Crowley/for VTDigger

Sen. Dick McCormack, D-Windsor, listens in the Senate chamber on the opening day of the legislative session. Photo by Roger Crowley/for VTDigger

A bill allowing home-based child-care providers to unionize passed its first committee vote on the Legislature’s opening day.

The proposal to offer early educators collective bargaining rights, previously shot down in committee and stalled in the Senate, unanimously passed a Senate Education Committee vote Tuesday.

A similar effort was first stalled in 2011 by large child-care centers, including the YMCA and the Burlington Boys and Girls Club. The current bill only applies to home-based child-care providers, not centers.

Sen. Dick McCormack, D-Windsor, who chairs the Education Committee, said early education unionization, one of his top priorities this year, has the votes to pass the Senate.

“It’s a good bill, it creates a good policy. Collective bargaining in a fundamental human right and these people – overwhelming woman, though not all – who do this important work ought to have the power that comes with the union,” he said. “This is the moment when it will come to the full Senate on its merits.”

McCormack said the legislation has never had a clean up or down vote and has been previously buckled under procedural scrutiny.

Last year, the bill, which was tacked on to a miscellaneous education bill, stalled in the Senate after Sen. Kevin Mullin, R-Rutland, who chairs the Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs Committee, questioned whether the collective bargaining provision was germane to the underlying education bill.

The bill is heading for Senate Appropriations Committee. It is likely to hit the floor sometime in the next week, said Committee Vice Chair Don Collins, D-Franklin.

Last month, Vermont received a $37 million federal Early Learning Race to the Top grant to support early education programs for low-income and high-needs children. Collins said this money is an opportunity to make some changes to early education and child care.

“I think with money like that and the early education bill that’s over in Senate [Appropriations Committee] that we passed here last year, I think there’s a concerted effort to kind of bring everybody together to improve the quality of early care and education.“

Last year, the Legislature granted collective bargaining rights to home care workers and passed a “fair share” bill, which requires some education, state and municipal employees who opt not to join a union to pay fees to the union.

The bill is backed by the Vermont Early Educators United, an affiliate of the local American Federation of Teachers.

John Herrick

Leave a Reply

8 Comments on "Child-care workers collective bargaining bill sails through Senate committee"


Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Patrick Cashman
3 years 15 days ago

Wow, they sure are wasting no time on this one.
Since the fix appears to already be in, how about one small change; make support of the union voluntary. Make it:
“The bargaining unit may be composed of licensed home child care providers and their employees, registered home child care providers and their employees, and license-exempt child care providers and their employees who explicitly choose the labor organization to be their exclusive representative.”

It’s a small change that allows choice for providers instead of forcibly unionizing all regardless of their wishes.

karen hebert
3 years 15 days ago

OMG!! when will there be common sense in their heads to see this does NOTHING for INDEPENDENTLY OWNED & OPERATED IN HOME REGISTERED CHILDCARE PROVIDERS???? Please stop wasting taxpayers $$$$ & move on & away from this as it will cause so many headaches for ALL in the future!

Deb Thayer
3 years 15 days ago

I am so not surprised that this went flying through! But, have to say that this union drive does nothing for “childcare workers” This to me seems to be driven at business owners, registered and licensed childcare providers who receive state subsidy money. I do like the comments by Mr. Cashmen that would make this voluntary and membership available to my employee, instead of just me the small business owner.

After all this country was built on unions to protect the rights of it’s members……What is this protecting me from? Myself?

Donna Aiken
3 years 15 days ago
I agree with Mr. Cashman that the bill needs to be worded that this is “voluntary” not “mandatory”. Why should a registered home provider either have to join or pay a “fair share” fee when the Union does nothing to help us registered home providers. Hey I have a secret for all you who think us registered home providers need a Union for our voice. Last year alone I attended over 106 hours of classes and guess what I did not need the Union or pay the Union to help me find classes. There is multiple ways of class information… Read more »
Janette Dumont
3 years 15 days ago
What I just DON’T seem to understand, year after year of fighting this battle, is WHY there isn’t a “choice” to join said union or not. It is abundantly clear, WHY…the union will want the dues of EVERY child care provider across the state, not just the ones that want them interfering in their business. I have successfully run a registered home child care, without a union, for almost a decade. Last year alone I had over 100 training hours, I have gotten 2 Stars and working on a 3rd, gotten a Northern Lights Ladder II certificate and the ONLY… Read more »
Donna Aiken
3 years 14 days ago

You are exactly correct in your statement Tim Smith. So I guess Mr. McCormack is saying it is ok to force people to join the Union or have to pay a fair share union fee even if they do not want to. Another way of them trying to be in control of everyone!

Tracy Weeks
3 years 14 days ago
This bill seems to be a waste of time. Why is the State getting involved in this? Seems to me they are trying to control people, not help them. The comment about “Those people, mostly women” makes it sound like they are doing women a favor because they are weak and can’ t stand up for themselves or run a business. What a joke. Have we gone back in time or something? I thought Vermont in history has been anti-union for the most part. The reason being we are a “work at will”, or “free will” state. Meaning you can… Read more »
Larry Brooks
2 years 11 months ago

Have Senators considered how the US Supreme Court’s pending decision in Harris v. Quinn might impact VT’s childcare unionization bill? Central issue is whether an individual can be forced to join a union.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Child-care workers collective bargaining bill sails through Senate co..."