Lawmakers open police records to public scrutiny

Lawmakers open police records to public scrutiny

The Vermont Legislature has approved opening the criminal investigative files of police to public scrutiny, in a move modeling Vermont’s open records standards on a federal model.

A conference committee to debate differences between the House and Senate on the legislation came to an agreement by Tuesday morning, said Sen. Dick Sears, D-Bennington.

Senators like Sears were concerned about language inserted by the House, which made it public record when and if a grand jury of citizens met to decide whether to charge a police officer with police misconduct.

Currently, the existence of grand juries, as well as what they discuss during court hearings, is kept secret, especially if no criminal charges are filed against the defendant. The House’s language came upon the advice of Attorney General Bill Sorrell.

Sears wanted that language removed, and the conference committee agreed.

In exchange, the House received an OK for moving privacy protections, designed to redact the names of victims and witnesses of crime, from actual statute language into the “intent” section of the legislation, which signals what lawmakers mean by their policy choices.

Previously, the Senate wanted that language in the statute.

Sears also said letters of instruction will be sent out to state officials to emphasize that lawmakers want victims’ names redacted, but that a redaction won’t mean that the whole record will be withheld from those who request it.

Under the legislation, police records produced during a criminal investigation are presumed open unless a government attorney successfully argued that one of six exceptions, which keep the file confidential, apply.

“I think it’s a tremendously important step for Vermont,” said Sears, who shepherded the legislation through as Senate Judiciary chair. State courts can benefit from the significant body of case law already amassed by federal courts in past battles over open records, he said.

Nat Rudarakanchana

Leave a Reply

2 Comments on "Lawmakers open police records to public scrutiny"


Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
David Dempsey
3 years 8 months ago
When you have an attorney general who consistantly has cleared police officers that his office investigates of any wrongdoing during his long tenure, this legislation is a big step in the right direction. I have great respect for the police and the difficult and dangerous work they do. They are definately underpaid for the risks they face everyday. But to think that no police officer in Vermont would possibly do something wrong is akin to saying no town treasurer in Vermont would ever do anything wrong. With so many towns getting fleeced by town officers, you would think that the… Read more »
Christian Noll
3 years 8 months ago
Well said Dave. “Those investigations should be done by some type of independent party.” I could not possibly agree with you more. There is no monitoring system, either licensing, oversight committee nor otherwise for reporting police misconduct in Vermont, or at least logging it somewhere. I’ve posted propositions about this in Greg Guma’s October 1st 2012 vtdigger article on police “oversight” or the “commission” and why we would have and independent police oversight committee in Vermont. So if the incident never makes the media (most do not), we the public will never know about it. I was amazed to… Read more »
Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Lawmakers open police records to public scrutiny"