Dunsmore: Why the neocons don’t like Hagel

Editor’s note: This op-ed by retired ABC News diplomatic correspondent Barrie Dunsmore first aired on Vermont Public Radio.  All his columns can be found on his website, www.barriedunsmore.com.

Weeks before Chuck Hagel was announced as President Obama’s choice to run the Pentagon, a campaign against Hagel was launched by neoconservatives led by William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard magazine. Kristol is not just any neo-conservative. His father was known as the godfather of the movement of intellectuals whowere once part of America’s Far Left — who in the 1960s began flipping to the Far Right over their disenchantment with American liberalism. Irving Kristol used to joke that a neoconservative was “a liberal who had been mugged by reality.”

One feature of neoconservatism is that it advocates an aggressive, hard-line foreign policy. Another, is that it is strongly pro-Israel and historically has had close ties with Israel’s current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Those two policy goals came together when neocons in George W. Bush’s administration pressed for the invasion of Iraq. They wanted to show the world that with the end of the Cold War, America was the top dog and would not hesitate to use force to protect or advance its interests. And the overthrow of Iraq’s Saddam Hussein would make the neighborhood safer for Israel.

The opening shots of the campaign against Hagel were that he was not supportive of Israel. This past week Elliot Abrams, a noted neocon in the Reagan and Bush administrations, went so far as openly calling Hagel an anti-Semite. Abrams cited remarks Hagel once made, critical of the scare tactics of the “Jewish lobby” in Washington. Hagel now admits he should have said Israeli lobby because Christians, especially many evangelicals, are also strongly pro Israel.

As Carl Bernstein of Watergate fame put it this week, being critical of the current hard-line Israeli government, doesn’t make one an anti-Semite.

But the insidious suggestions that Hagel is an anti-Semite have been strongly challenged by a wide range of prominent American Jews. As Carl Bernstein of Watergate fame put it this week, being critical of the current hard-line Israeli government, doesn’t make one an anti-Semite. Bernstein added that many American Jews, not to mention numerous Israelis, are unhappy with that government.

Actually, earlier this week two top officials from the current Israeli government praised Hagel for his record of strong support for Israel. So what is going on here

As a twice wounded and decorated Vietnam vet, Hagel believes that war must be an absolute last resort. He has been very cautious on the subject of a possible Israeli and/or American attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. The neoconservatives apparently fear that if Hagel is secretary of Defense, he could become a roadblock to the use of force to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power. They worry that he will encourage the president to allow the Iranians to drag out negotiations that might eventually involve American concessions that neither the neocons nor Netanyahu will find acceptable. Perhaps.

But I believe most Americans, including most American Jews, would find a negotiated outcome in Iran far more preferable than another Mideast War — a war most likely to be even more costly than Iraq and Afghanistan combined.

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Walter Carpenter

    Have not these neocons had enough with two failed wars? And they want to launch us on a third? I bet if they had to be in the first wave, they would not be so hasty to start another war.

  • Dan Maxon

    There’s no more shock left, but I remain awed by these neocon’s blinders. Or should I say blunders?

  • Alex Barnham

    OK YOU WARMONGERS, WHO SAID THIS?
    WAR is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

    A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.

    ANSWER: Smedley Darlington Butler (1881-1940), nicknamed “The Fighting Quaker” and “Old Gimlet Eye,” was a Major General in the U.S. Marine Corps. THAT’S RIGHT – MAJOR GENERAL IN THE MARINES. Get a brain and read the rest of what this man has to say and then see if you are willing to risk your life for the money crowd. Never heard of this speech in public school? Your education is sorely lacking. Neither did I. I had to wait until I finally stumbled upon this very important information.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Dunsmore: Why the neocons don’t like Hagel"