State moves ahead with Middlesex mental health facility

The state has started construction on modular units of a temporary state mental health facility near the State Police Barracks in Middlesex despite a pending permit appeal. Photo by Anne Galloway

The state began construction on a seven-bed psychiatric facility in Middlesex this week despite a pending appeal of its zoning permit.

The residential facility is part of the state’s mental health overhaul, started after Tropical Storm Irene destroyed the state’s 54-bed psychiatric hospital in Waterbury. Since then, state officials have scrambled to find open beds to treat psychiatric patients, and they say the facility is meant to temporarily meet patient needs until a permanent fix is found.

The sooner the facility is available for patients, say mental health officials, the more money it will save the state and taxpayers. It costs $1,500 a day to house the kind of low-risk patients who would be treated in Middlesex in acute care hospitals.

Director of Mental Health Services Frank Reed is overseeing the planning of the residential facility in Middlesex. He said that the state estimates the new facility will save the state roughly $500 a day per patient. That figure includes construction and operational costs.

Brian Hannon, who is appealing the zoning permit for fear that the facility’s patients might pose a threat to his children, lives next to the site of the facility. Earlier this week, he received a letter from the state. “About a half hour later they started to do what they’re going to do,” he said.

On Thursday afternoon, the state began moving the modular units into place next to the Middlesex State Police Barracks. Construction is slated for completion in mid-January and state officials hope to have the facility up and running by early spring.

The reason the state is able to push forward with the project is that the permit issued by the Middlesex Zoning Board of Adjustments is now valid.

Hannon and his lawyer could have motioned to “stay,” or make the permit invalid, during the appeal process, but they didn’t file a motion during the allotted window. After 15 days, Vermont statute allows such permits to take effect if no motion to stay has been approved. For that reason, the state has a valid permit to proceed with the project.

A pre-trial conference between Hannon and the state is slated for Dec. 10 in the Vermont Superior Court Environmental Division.

Jeff Lively, who is the legal counsel for the Vermont Department of Buildings and General Services, said that the state would ask for an expedited trial. The court will treat the appeal like a fresh case, and Lively is optimistic that the state will receive the same permit it received from the zoning board, or at least one very similar in nature.

Last week, Charles Merriman, the Middlesex zoning board chair and a Montpelier lawyer, said that the facility slated for the state’s land safely met the necessary criteria to be permitted.

Lively said on Thursday that although there’s a chance that the environmental court could impose new conditions — like extra fencing, a tree barrier or other measures — the state cannot afford to wait to begin building.

“The state does do a cost-benefit analysis and we weigh all of these policy decisions and impacts, and, of course, we don’t take lightly spending taxpayer money we don’t need to spend,” he said. “Our hope and belief is that this permit will be approved as is.

“If it isn’t, and there are additional conditions, we believe they’ll be reasonable and relatively inexpensive alterations. When you weigh that against the costs we’re incurring every day, for sure, it made sense for us to move forward.”

Mary Moulton, who is taking over as commissioner of the Department of Mental Health, said the decision would help relieve some of the financial and infrastructural stress on the state’s mental health system.

“There’s no doubt that it’s extremely important to move ahead,” said Moulton. “We continue to have pressure in the system based on a lack of inpatient hospital beds and we do have patients that just don’t need that level of higher acuity care.”

Patients who are on the cusp of moving back into communities will be treated at the Middlesex facility, Moulton said.

On Thursday afternoon, Hannon did not share the state’s enthusiasm.

“I told them in the zoning board meeting that I was going to be forced to move, and I wasn’t kidding,” he said. “That’s still how I feel.”

Andrew Stein

Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • David Black

    I wish the State would built something for the sane people of Vermont. Ya know the ones that pay the HIGH taxes to live hear.

  • Nick Berger

    Yes the state must move ahead. Let’s lock up all the criminally insane next to CVMC and the “mall”. Who has the contracts and how will they get paid. Any local folks.

  • Zachary Hughes

    fustration continues with this thing called stigma!!

  • Curtis Sinclair

    The crimes most of the ‘criminally insane’ patients at VSH were charged with were usually misdemeanors like stealing cigarettes or hitchhiking on the interstate.

    • Curtis Sinclair

      I used to live in Waterbury very close to VSH and across the street from a residential care facility. It was not a problem. In fact there was an entire office complex of state workers right next to VSH. The patients and state workes would often mingle at the hospital’s canteen and there were no serious problems.

  • Zachary Hughes

    There is no threat and id be happy to live next to a facility in fact I live near one now! There are a total of 7 or 8 low income folks with mental illness that live near me and I have no issue with it!
    I also have a mental illness! Guess what? I live in my own apartment and I pay my taxs and go to work just like the rest of you! Are you you really gonna try to tell me my presence is a threat to you and your kids or your property value??
    Nonesense but you can still try
    When is this gonna stop?
    Anyone of you I am waiting to hear your issues. Please do not hide!

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "State moves ahead with Middlesex mental health facility"