State tax revenues downgraded for fiscal years 2013 and 2104

Members of the Emergency Board convene on July 20, 2012.

Members of the Emergency Board convene on July 20, 2012.

State economists Thomas Kavet and Jeffrey Carr have downgraded their state tax revenue forecast, projecting an $11 million reduction for fiscal year 2013.

The two economists told the Emergency Board on Friday that state revenues would be about $20 million less in fiscal year 2014, than they had originally forecast. The reductions cut across the key general, transportation, and education funds.

“We were watching the economy carefully and closely, but it does seem with the downshift in the macro economy, there’s concern there’ll be a little less revenue,” said Kavet at the public hearing, prefacing this by describing the revenue in fiscal year 2012 as “generally pretty good.”

The two economists submitted separate reports to the board which agreed on most fundamentals. Kavet works for the Legislature and Carr for the Shumlin administration.

Kavet’s report attributed the less optimistic economic environment to “political dysfunction in both Washington and Brussels,” and accompanying policy inaction. Uncertainty surrounding European debt problems is a key factor here, as is the so-called potential future ‘’fiscal cliff” in Washington, which refers to politically paralyzed fiscal policy and several impending laws slated to come into effect simultaneously in 2013.

But Kavet added that Vermont’s real estate market is bottoming out, seeing “small gains,” and that this will eventually mean more construction jobs. Vermont home prices increased in the first quarter of 2012, a positive feature, especially given the fact that no other Northeastern states reported rising home prices.

Still, he said: “It’s hard to imagine that we’re going to have the kind of economic turnaround that we were hoping was going to come in [fiscal year] 13, six months ago, which now doesn’t look like it’s coming until we get into [fiscal years] 14 and 15.”

But Gov. Peter Shumlin, a member of the Emergency Board, wanted to remind the audience that Vermont’s financial situation is strong given the context of the recent economic recession.

Tom Kavet, economist for the Vermont Legislature, speaks at an Emergency Board meeting on July 20, 2012. Photo by Taylor Dobbs

Tom Kavet, economist for the Vermont Legislature, speaks at an Emergency Board meeting on July 20, 2012. VTD Photo/Taylor Dobbs

“I do think that our ability to balance budgets in Vermont, to pay our bills, to maintain our extraordinary bond rating, and to be fiscally smart, not to spend money we don’t have, is paying off,” said Shumlin. He reported that other governors at a National Governors Association last weekend had complimented him on the state of Vermont’s finances.

But Shumlin also conceded that, “perhaps, projections weren’t as exuberant as what we had all hoped.”

The two reports, which contain hundreds of data points, were produced respectively by Economic & Policy Resources Inc., based in Williston, and by Kavet, Rockler & Associates, LLC, based in Williamstown.

Economist Jeffrey Carr concluded this part of the public meeting with: “Basically, we are continuing to increase our revenues year over year. Our growth isn’t at our earlier projections, but we’re continuing on a positive trajectory, and that’s good news.”

Other items heard at the Emergency Board meeting included the Vermont Economic Progress Council’s request to exceed a $10 million spending cap on employment growth incentives, as well as a Medicaid spending and caseload report.

Nat Rudarakanchana

Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Stan Hopson

    That “macro economy” you’re talking about is the no-growth policies out of Washington supported locally by our single party/single payer rule. You can try to change the subject all you want and make it about tax returns and dogs on cars, but at the end of the day 2 out of 3 people think we’re heading in the wrong direction and Obama’s re-election is definitely in jeopardy.

    • David Bell

      Yeah, it’s all about Obama.

      The fact that we have the most unpopular Congress on record can’t have anything to do with why people think we’re headed in the wrong direction.

      And as for Shumlin, he must have phonied up all the polls that give him a double digit, land slide victory.

      Yep, everyone hates the idea of healthcare for all, it’s just a big conspiracy and everyone’s in on it.

  • Debra Pawlak

    Bottom line is Vermont cannot continue on its path of anti-business policies and continued taxation of its declining and aging population aka property taxes. We need innovative and fresh ideas. And a reason for our children to want to stay in the state–aka jobs!!

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "State tax revenues downgraded for fiscal years 2013 and 2104"