Digger Tidbits: Feds ante up $4M; fracking ban back in; new VY tax plan proposed; midwive measure passes House

Feds reimburse state $4 million for post-Irene work by Guard

Vermont will be reimbursed $4 million from the Federal Highway Administration to pay for work done by the National Guard on its roadways during the aftermath of Tropical Storm Irene.

Members of the Maine National Guard take a break after working into the evening to fix damage caused by Hurricane Irene in Pittsfield, Vt., on Sept. 5, 2011. Photo by Jim GreenHill.

Members of the Maine National Guard take a break after working into the evening to fix damage caused by Hurricane Irene in Pittsfield, Vt., on Sept. 5, 2011. Photo by Jim GreenHill.

More than 500 miles of roadways and bridges were damaged during the storm, and Vermont National Guard and units from several other states were called in by the Agency of Transportation to help with the cleanup.

“One hundred percent of that $4 million is paid for by the Federal Highways because they recognize that the National Guard was out there building roads, doing heavy construction, taking the same risks that our Agency of Transportation and private contractors were,” said Gov. Peter Shumlin at a press conference Wednesday, flanked by Brian Searles, VTrans secretary, and Michael Dubie, adjutant general of the Vermont National Guard.

Shumlin said the $4 million frees up funding for other repairs needed after the storm. The reimbursement also sets a new precedent for the Federal Highway Administration, which typically does not reimbursed states for National Guard work during emergencies.

Vermont’s initial request was denied, but the Federal Highway Administration accepted an appeal filed Feb. 7 after the state successfully showed that the National Guard worked under the state’s direct supervision on roadway repair. Typically, the National Guard focuses more on security and traffic control following emergencies, as opposed to cleanup, according to Searles.

“This response, this operation was different, and it was different enough for the folks at Federal Highways in Washington to actually change the guidance to other states on these issues,” said Searles.

~ Erin Hale

Fracking ban gets preliminary approval

The Vermont Senate gave its first nod Wednesday to a bill that would ban the controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing — or fracking — for natural gas.

In a 27-1 vote, the Senate shifted course from the House, which passed a three-year moratorium rather than a ban.

The Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy recommended a ban.

Proponents of the bill say “fracking” has the potential to contaminate groundwater, and the science is unclear as to its environmental and health effects.

The American Petroleum Institute published ads this week in local papers pushing for a moratorium rather than an outright ban.

The ads show outlines of workers with a line reading “Shouldn’t we know the facts before we make a final decision.”

The Senate Committee on Agriculture heard testimony from the industry Wednesday morning on the potential benefits to farmers who lease parts of their land to drilling companies. The leases can yield millions of dollars for farmers.

Sen. Sara Kittell, chair of the Agriculture committee, said her committee does not intend to offer an amendment to the bill.

~ Alan Panebaker

Shumlin offers Clean Energy Development Fund proposal

The Vermont Department of Taxes recommended Wednesday an increase in a generating tax on Vermont Yankee that could make up for money that has been going to the Clean Energy Development Fund.

The tax would net approximately $12 million annually for the state and replace revenue from expiring agreements with Entergy.

Under two agreements between the state and Entergy, Vermont Yankee’s owner, the state has received about $6 million annually to fund renewable energy projects.

The agreements expire this year, and whether the plant’s owner will continue to pay into the fund is not settled. The Vermont Public Service Board is currently considering whether to issue a new license to the plant, and the state is appealing a federal court decision that found a state law that required legislative approval for Vermont Yankee’s continued operation was unconstitutional.

The Vermont Department of Public Service wants the company to keep making payments to the fund, but Entergy has told the Public Service Board it will put its periodic payments in escrow until it has assurance it can keep operating and that the state will not raise its tax.

In a recent order, the Public Service Board said that Entergy must live up to its obligations in its certificates of public good but that it would not rule on specific obligations, such as payments to the fund.

Under a bill that passed the House, $6 million would be split among the education fund, the Clean Energy Development Fund and a special fund to help Windham County deal with the plant’s closure.

Molly Bachman, general counsel for the Vermont Department of Taxes, told the Senate Committee on Finance that the idea is for Vermont Yankee to shoulder the same burden of the budget as it has in the past.

Senator Randy Brock. VTD/Josh Larkin

Senator Randy Brock. VTD/Josh Larkin

Sen. Randy Brock, a member of the committee, said the increase in the generating tax, from $5 million to around $12 million, doesn’t seem like the same tax liability.

“If you’re doubling the tax, how is the burden the same?” he said.

Considering the pending litigation with Entergy, the new tax could mean another potential lawsuit for the state, according to Deputy Attorney General Scott Kline.

“There is a risk associated with a bill that would increase a generating tax at this time,” Kline said.

Neither Kline nor legislative counsel would get into the details of a potential legal challenge or recommend approval the amendment.

Sen. Dick McCormack, a member of the committee, said sticking taxpayers with legal fees is not something he would look forward to.

Entergy is currently requesting the state be ordered to pay it more than $4 million in fees from the past litigation.

On the other hand, McCormack said, “The idea of the state holding back on protecting the interests of the people because we’re afraid of a lawsuit undermines our democratic society.”

Gabrielle Stebbins, executive director of Renewable Energy Vermont, said the new proposal, which could result in more money for renewable energy developers than the House bill would, is a step in the right direction.

However, unlike the past agreements, there’s no guarantee the money will go to renewable energy, she said. That’s up to the Appropriations committee to decide how it gets divvied up.

The tax rate of $.0025 per kilowatt hour would be less than the rate for wind energy generation.

~ Alan Panebaker

Midwives insurance carvout passes House

In a 76-46 vote, the House passed a bill that would require insurance companies to cover midwife services for two years even if they do not have malpractice insurance.

The bill adds a legislative “fix” to a law enacted last year that requires insurance companies to cover home births.

After last year’s law went into effect, some families found their insurance company would not cover midwivery services despite the mandate. Insurance companies would only cover midwife services for in-network providers, and those midwives would have to have malpractice insurance.

The Vermont Medical Society opposed the amendment and in an open letter to the House of Representatives said the bill could allow patients who have a bad outcome to sue other doctors, hospitals or the state.

The letter states, “if midwives carry their own insurance, it will reduce the risk that their liability will be shifted to other insured health care professionals, facilities or the state.”

Midwives claim the insurance is too expensive, and there are not enough of them in the state to form a group to get a cheaper rate.

In 2014, they will be required to have malpractice insurance for their services to be covered.

~ Alan Panebaker

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Paul Felix

    Hydraulic Fracturing a Danger to us All.

    Only the wicked in mind Leaders in this Nation and around the world would let anyone Pipe Pollution into the ground to get gas in return from the Ground. Most all scientist have know this for many years that this will end safe drinking water for all that are in the area of where they are fracturing, in which Millions of Gallons of Dangerous Poison Chemically Treated Water are forced underground to break up rock and free gas. We need regulations from GODLY People that will stop 10,000+ wells a year drilled using hydraulic fracturing to free and make the Dangerous Poison Chemicals underground into gas. The primarily affect will be unsafe drinking water and many will become sick. THE HEALTH OF MANY WILL DETERIORATE because of A Few Wicked Greedy Leaders. Those who have made these decisions do not know Jesus Christ. Soon He will say i know you not. They belong in jail soon it will be hell for them. What sick in mind would let or want anyone to put Dangerous Poison Chemicals underground or into the ground anywhere.

    The wicked are trying to sell and tell all if it is not near your home or land it is safe. This is the biggest ling of horse manure. Do they think most of We The People are that dumb or that most Americans lack any intelligence at all. What ever is put on or in the ground makes it way to our underground Aquifers, Rivers, Lakes and the Oceans. Every Scientist on Earth knows this and most all that have made it to eighth grade in school.

    So why would any Leader with a good healthy mind ever say or want this?

    Vote any wicked that has anything to do with this out of office they work for WE THE PEOPLE.

    United We Stand In GOD We Trust

    The Lord’s Little Helper
    Paul Felix Schott

    Wicked Leaders telling their friends as long as you can cover it up and it will not get back to me it is ok with me. Are you sure we will not go to jail for making money by Polluting the ground and water. Of course not we make the laws to fit our needs not the health and welfare of others or as they used to say We The People. Its now the Wicked Leaders and rich Rule. Till our Lord GOD comes!

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Digger Tidbits: Feds ante up $4M; fracking ban back in; new VY tax pl..."