Over 4,500 oppose the tooth tax + video

March 17, 2011

Peter Taylor

Executive Director
Vermont State Dental Society
[email protected]

Montpelier, Vt. — When the government tries to tax your teeth, things are going in the wrong direction.

That is what Vermont State Dental Society  (VSDS) executive director Peter Taylor said today when he presented over 4,500 signatures opposing a proposed provider tax tolegislative leaders, House Speaker Shap Smith, D-Morrisville, and Senate Pro Temp John Campbell, D-Windsor.

Dentists will be forced to pass the tax to the consumer. The VSDS and over 4,500 petition signers believe that the three percent taxwould penalize those taking preventive measures for their oral health. Within weeks of putting up petitions all over the state, the VSDS has found over 4,500 Vermonters who want to keep their teeth tax-free.

“It doesn’t make any sense to tax people who are taking a proactive role in their oral health and hygiene,” said Taylor. “We believe it makes much more sense to tax items that hinder oral health like candy, soda and tobacco. Taxing health care to pay for health care is a math problem that just doesn’t add up.”

The tax would impose a three percent tax on the gross receipts of dental services, and is expected to raise $6 million. That $6 million will be matched by the federal government for a grand total of $15 million. The dentists will then receive $6 million back in Medicaid reimbursements, and state coffers will keep the difference of $9 million.

Private dental practices account for 80 percent of Medicaid treatment in the state, so some dentists will have the opportunity to receive some money back by seeing Medicaid patients. However, most dentists who will experience a benefit from the increased Medicaid payments believe that a tax on dental services is not the correct way to raise these funds. There are other more broad based taxes or taxes on unhealthy products that can raise the same revenue.

Over the past few years, the VSDS has made tremendous strides in recruiting new dentists to the state to ensure a sufficient dental workforce, but remains concerned that such a tax would interfere with theseefforts.

Taylor presented the petition backed by dentists, dental hygienists and dental assistants and Vermonters from all walks of life, all of whom oppose the tax.

“I don’t understand how the administration can propose a tax on the one health service that patients pay out of pocket for,” said Burlington dentist Steve Pitmon. “They are not applying this tax to physicians or others whose services are more commonly included under insurance. In the end this is just going to hurt our patients and their ability to take care of their oral health.”

[youtube sFP8k1eCxl4]
Press Release

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Deb Ty

    Again, this shows that they are not handling responsibilities properly and we may have the wrong people in their positions and need to rectify that during our next election.
    Going to the dentist in VT is already costly. My sons need for braces will cost 5000.00. He needs this and we can’t afford it, and who loses here, not you, but the child. Now you want to add more to what is already out of reach? I barely can afford 6 month check ups now, and I have 3 kids.

    Again, I think we have the wrong ones in the positions we put you in.

  • Paul Donovan

    The math in paragraph 5 makes sense to me.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Over 4,500 oppose the tooth tax + video"