Senate Democrats set legislative priorities

Senate Majority Leader Phil Baruth summarizes the priorities for the 2014 legislative session, as identified by caucus members Thursday. Photo by Alicia Freese/VTDigger

Senate Majority Leader Phil Baruth summarizes the priorities for the 2014 legislative session, as identified by caucus members Thursday. Photo by Alicia Freese/VTDigger

Bridging a $70 million budget gap, monitoring Vermont Health Connect and taking stock of the state’s mental health system are the main concerns for Senate Democrats in 2014.

Nearly everyone in the 23-member caucus convened at the Capitol Plaza Hotel on Thursday in Montpelier to pinpoint their priorities for the 2014 session.

Beyond the big three, there was a widespread scope of agendas among lawmakers.

The Democratic senators placed several bills, which passed in the House but hit snags in the Senate, high on the list for 2014. Among them is legislation to stiffen regulations on the development of lakeshores, a bill to allow child care workers to unionize, and one to mandate paid sick leave.

The priority-setting exercise spurred a series of impromptu speeches from senators.

Sen. Anthony Pollina, P/D-Washington, spoke about the need to reverse wage stagnation and growing income inequality.

Sen. John Rodgers, D-Essex-Orleans, warned of the drawbacks of industrial wind projects.

Sen. David Zuckerman, P-Chittenden, strategized about one of his longtime goals — legislation to label GMO foods, which passed the House passed last session and will be assigned to committee in January.

The topic of wind appeared no less contentious than the year before, when Rodgers was a ring leader for a bill that would have placed a three-year moratorium on large-scale wind projects.

Thursday, Rodgers test-drove a new argument against the projects: That turbine production has degraded the environment in China.

Sen. Ginny Lyons, D-Chittenden, quickly jumped in, disputing Rodger’s call for an overhaul of the state’s energy plan.

“There’s a lot of heat and light in it,” Sen. Mark MacDonald, D-Orange, observed, before steering the conversation back toward the budget.

On the issue of flat wages, several Democrats lined up behind a bill to raise the minimum wage. Peter Galbraith, D-Windham, who joined the gathering by phone, from Paris, proffered the legislation as one solution.

Shumlin, when asked about it, pledged to be open-minded, but made no promises.

“I’m willing to enter into any conversation about ways to ensure we have an equitable minimum wage,” Shumlin said. But, he added, “Obviously with everything we do, the devil is always in the details.”

Shumlin and Campbell reassured the caucus that the budget gap, though sizeable, is nothing new and can be addressed without, as Shumlin put it, “sticking it to the most vulnerable Vermonters.”

But not all caucus members echoed their optimism. “We have seen this movie five times,” MacDonald said, and once again, “it feels like the script has been written for us.” He described the lawmakers’ role as doing damage control for the impact of cuts on middle and low-income Vermonters.”

“We appear hopeless in how we as a state legislature can make a difference and then we take great pride in the things that we work hard at to see that it happens gently,” MacDonald said. “I’ve said to a couple colleagues in the Senate that one of the things we do as a Democratic caucus is go out to the public and say, ‘Gee, things are really bad but they’d be even worse if the Republicans were in charge, and I don’t know how many years in a row we can do that.”

Several senators made calls to action for addressing opiate addiction, as did Shumlin who said he’ll propose solutions to the Legislature at the start of the session. “I am willing, as governor, to have the courage to do things differently despite the risks.”

The governor had a grim assessment of what will happen if the Legislature doesn’t take action. “Our sense of security, our sense of place, our sense of community, our sense of safety — it’s going to go down the tubes.”

Senate President Pro-Tem John Campbell, D-Windsor, and Shumlin offered the same message on health care — look past the naysayers and those prone to “embellishing” the problems with Vermont Health Connect and the challenges of transitioning to a publicly financed system.

“I understand there are problems and there are going to be people who are going to take that and they are going to try to embellish that,” Campbell said. “I would hope that each and every one remain committed to the goals we set forth when it came down to talking abut health care for all Vermonters.”

Shumlin repeated the same message he delivered to House Democrats last week, asking them to plow the ground for single payer.

Alicia Freese

Leave a Reply

11 Comments on "Senate Democrats set legislative priorities"

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Kim Fried
2 years 1 month ago

Let me just inform the Govenor once again that “our sense of security, are sense of place, our sense of community, our sense of safety-it’s going down the tubes” is already a reality in the Northeast Kingdom thanks to his, “his”, the GOVENOR’S policies on ridge line industrial wind development. I guess it just depends who he’s willing to destroy.

2 years 1 month ago

Senator Rodgers is correct to call for an overhaul of the state’s energy programs. 1) The SPEED projects produce low-quality energy at an increasing average cost, and the average has been increasing EACH YEAR SINCE INCEPTION, according to DPS records. Analysis of DPS data shows SPEED energy production costs of: 2010, last six months: 13.87 c/kWh 2011: 16.44 2012: 17.16 2013, first eight months: 19.30 http://vermontspeed.com/speed-monthly-production/ http://vermontspeed.squarespace.com/project-status/ 2) The Lowell Mountain ridge line wind turbine plant: – capital cost was about $2600/kW to build versus about $2000/kW in the Midwest, – capacity factor is less than 0.20 versus 0.33 claimed;… Read more »

2 years 1 month ago

Vermont’s government budget is increasing, its programs gobble up more money than estimated, its spending exceeds what can be squeezed from the shrinking, hollowed-out private sector; EB-5 and various federal government funds/subsidies is not going to save Vermont. – It is time to reduce spending by at least $100 million/yr, because next year Vermont’s economy will do worse than this year, as the FED’s $85 billion/MONTH pump-priming with phantom money will be tapering down in 2014. – Education spending is grossly out of control. – Platinum healthcare plans for state, county and municipal employees have to be turned into bronze… Read more »

Doug Hoffer
2 years 1 month ago

Mr. Post said, “Vermont’s…spending exceeds what can be squeezed from the shrinking, hollowed-out private sector.”

In fact, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the real (inflation adjusted) growth of Vermont’s private sector Gross State Product from 2008 to 2012 was 14th best in the country, well above the U.S. rate, and the highest in New England.

Facts matter Mr. Post.

Kathy Callaghan
2 years 1 month ago

Campbell said. “I would hope that each and every one remain committed to the goals we set forth when it came down to talking abut health care for all Vermonters.” The goals we set forth were universal health care for all. It will be interesting to see what the voting public is willing to pay when the cost of the “single payer” option finally becomes known. We all favor universal health care coverage, but many people question whether Act 48 as written is the way to accomplish the goal. Don’t forget, Act 48 was passed in 2010 based on the… Read more »

Lee Russ
2 years 1 month ago

“the Hsaio report’s purported “$590 million savings in the first year”. We now know that not only will there be no $590m savings the first year, but estimates are that the first year costs will be between $1.6 billion and $2.2 billion.” You make it sound like we’ve gone from expecting to save $590 million to expecting to lose $1.6 to $2.2 billion. Not true unless I’ve missed something major. The savings estimate compared total healthcare costs under the current system to total healthcare costs under Green Mountain Care. The cost of instituting GMC was taken into account in that… Read more »

Dave Bellini
2 years 1 month ago

“…healthcare plans for state, county and municipal employees have to be turned into bronze plans…”
.
I doubt Post would like a “bronze plan” response if he ever had to dial 911 and needed those state, county or municipal employees he disparages.

2 years 1 month ago

Dave,

We are retired, on Social Security, pay $400 per mont month for Medicare and AARP premiums, no dental and no drug benefits.

The vast majority of Vermonters do not even have the equivalence of a “bronze” plan.

The government workers could upgrade their plans to a “silver” plan, just as we upgraded our Medicare Plan with an AARP Plan.

Dave Bellini
2 years 1 month ago

We all make our choices Willem. Government jobs don’t pay much money and there’s no one getting rich working for the state or a Vermont municipality. The average retired state employee pension is less than $25,000. per year. Employees choose this work in part because it offers stable employment and good benefits as a trade-off for lower pay, no bonuses, constantly changing rules and management and listening to people like you who want to bring benefit levels down to whatever you have. I’m in favor of you getting a plan as good as state workers. I want to bring people… Read more »

Tony Redington
2 years 1 month ago

Agree with Dave Bellini–somehow Quebequers enjoy full nondeductible/no copay health care for all including prescriptions (also $8 a day regulated daycare services). Also, to provide the $90 million needed each year for transportation (commuter rail, intercity rail, light rail for Burlington/Rutland, walking/bicycling infrastructure statewide, increased Town Highway Grants and, yes, funding needed bridge/highway projects) costs $15 per capita per year even without fed help. We do not have to choose to be public service poor, we can do so much more with public funds to support our citizens, improve our cities and towns and help both new and existing businesses.… Read more »

Tony Redington
2 years 1 month ago

Oops! A decimal place error. Using Census QuickFacts–a $90 million general fund increase for transportation equals $350 per Vermont household per year or 0.6% of the median household income of $54,168. The $350 for the household cost compares, for example, to a saving from changing a solo drive to a 20-mile Link bus commute out of Burlington, about $3,500 after taxes–plus an employer saves about $600 a year for every “free” parking space no longer required for an employee. Of course, $90 million in additional general fund revenues would include some from business and would be progressively raised by income… Read more »

wpDiscuz
Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Senate Democrats set legislative priorities"