Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

One responseSubscribe to comments

  1. Good precautions from the Health Department to keep flu from spreading. However in terms of the effectiveness of the flu vaccine, the international Cochrane Collaborative, which reviews scientific data for accuracy and lack of bias, has conducted numerous scientific reviews on the efficacy of flu vaccines. Its studies have found that there is no compelling data to demonstrate the efficacy of the vaccine in preventing flu nor its ability to affect lost working days.

    In its review of health care workers and the elderly:
    “We conclude that there is no evidence that only vaccinating healthcare workers prevents laboratory-proven influenza, pneumonia, and death from pneumonia in elderly residents in long-term care facilities.—
    “http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub3/abstract

    Its review of 75 studies on the efficacy of the flu vaccine to prevent flu in the elderly, the Collaborative found, “Due to the poor quality of the available evidence, any conclusions regarding the effects of influenza vaccines for people aged 65 years or older cannot be drawn.”
    —http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004876.pub3/abstract

    Cochrane also reviewed studies on the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing flu in healthy adults. The review found that, “Vaccine use did not affect the number of people hospitalised or working days lost but caused one case of Guillian-Barré syndrome (a major neurological condition leading to paralysis) for every one million vaccinations. —”http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub4/abstract

    While assessing the ability of flu vaccine to prevent flu in healthy children, the review concluded that, “In children under the age of two, the efficacy of inactivated vaccine was similar to placebo.”—http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub4/abstract

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Health Dept.: Flu on the rise in Vermont – get vaccinated"