Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

5 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. From the outside, this whole case looks like a masterpiece of stonewalling. First the autopsy report took forever to be released, now they are withholding discovery because it’s part of a criminal investigation? Well, what’s the hold-up with the criminal investigation then? What is the AG trying to do, run the clock until the whole matter becomes last year’s news?

    If the cops didn’t have tasers at all, they might have to resort, not to more lethal weapons, but to reconciliation, diplomacy.

  2. And to date not one elected official or police officer has publicly advocated for protecting the public from police brutality. No offers of more stringent laws – nothing.

    Just stonewalling …. and a Vermonter was killed by police for “yelling aggressively”.

  3. This is an example of the BS coming from Shumlin about the new TRANSPARENCY in government. This person lost a loved one and the state would rather play games about what is evidence and what is not. If everyone thought the information was irrelevant than the request for information would never have been made in the first place!

  4. There is a simple way to avoid the conflicting stories behind these tragic events. We have the technological ability to add a compact GoPro type camera into these weapons. When the weapon is unholstered the camera would automatically start. IF the weapon is fired, the video would be locked into the weapon until a formal investigation of a fired weapon is completed. What could be simpler, and more transparent?

    1. Mark,this is a fine idea. Well said, it should be put on all police guns, not just Tasers. The powers that be will not want this. They will claim “Cost too much”, whatever the cost, it would be well worth it. This is human life we are talking about..

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Vermont denies Taser records release in Thetford man’s death"