Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

Mapping the electorate: Town by town snapshot of red and blue voting patterns

The state’s mapping gurus at Stone Environmental, a Montpelier-based GIS specialty company, has produced a set of town-by-town election results for each of the 2012 statewide races that is now available on the Vermont Secretary of State’s website.

The maps are a fascinating window on voters’ shifting political allegiances. Though certain races were all blue (Democratic) all the time, Vermonters still split the ticket.

In the presidential race, Vermont was the first state that was declared for President Barack Obama — only two towns voted for former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. Still, percentage wise it was a lot closer — Obama had 66 percent of ballots cast, while Romney had 31 percent.

Meanwhile, independent Sen. Bernie Sanders, who had a $7 million war chest, appears to have won every municipality in the state, although results are not yet in for Moretown from the Secretary of State’s office, according to David Healy of Stone Environmental. (Independents get a sunny yellow hue in this mapping exercise.) He beat his Republican challenger John MacGovern by 71 percentage points.

Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., also won handily, with only three red towns coming into view, and garnered 72 percent of the vote.

Voters in a number of towns that went blue for Obama and Welch and yellow for Sanders turned Republican red when it came to local elections and their choice for governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, state auditor, state treasurer, and the Vermont Senate and the House of Representatives (where orange Progressive wins and more yellow Independents show up). The state’s conservative strongholds are where they’ve always been: Orange, Franklin and Rutland counties and the Northeast Kingdom.

The reddest map of them all? The lieutenant governor’s race. Phil Scott, a Republican from Washington County, only lost about 37 towns out of a total of roughly 250. Scott, it turns out, was the only statewide win for the GOP in an election year in which the Democrats swept the top races and the Legislature. In the House races, Dems extended their reach, while in the Senate, the Progressives gained one more seat.

All of the maps, created by Charlie Hofmann at Stone, can be found on the Secretary of State’s website.

Click here for tallies and percentage results.

President


View Larger Map

U.S. Senate


View Larger Map

U.S. Representative


View Larger Map

Governor

Peter Shumlin, the incumbent Democrat, won by 57.8 percent against Republican Randy Brock, who got 37.55 percent of ballots cast. Shumlin lost big in the sparsely populated Northeast Kingdom and held his own in the GOP zones of Rutland, Orange and Franklin counties.

View Larger Map

Lieutenant governor


View Larger Map

State treasurer

In the most contentious race of the election season, Democrat Beth Pearce won by a much wider than pundits expected with 52 percent of the vote. Her opponent, Republican Wendy Wilton came in with 40.72 percent. Wilton, however, had broad support in the Rutland County area that stretched into a section of Addison County.

View Larger Map

State auditor

Doug Hoffer, a Democrat/Progressive, won by 54 percent of the vote against Vince Illuzzi, a Republican senator from the Northeast Kingdom. Illuzzi dominated his home turf but was unable to translate his popularity there into votes in the Southern part of the state and Chittenden County, where Hoffer is well known from his previous race for the seat in 2010.

View Larger Map

The Vermont Senate


View Larger Map

The House of Representatives


View Larger Map

7 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. The article states that “Doug Hoffer…won by 54 percent of the vote against Vince Illuzzi.”

    According to the Sec. of State, the results of the race for State Auditor were

    51.3% Hoffer
    45.1% Illuzzi
    3.4% Levy

  2. I would question some of these maps – the one red town on the US Senate map is Moretown, in a pretty deep blue area, and the data shows Bernie with ZERO votes. I think they might not have all the kinks worked out yet.

  3. Did Bernie really get zero votes on Moretown? Seems unlikely. I know a few folks from that town, and I can’t see them voting for MacGovern.

  4. Well, I live in Moretown and I voted for Bernie, and I’m sure I’m not the only one. Methinks someone may have juxaposed MacGovern and Bernie’s vote counts!

  5. Fourth paragraph in the article states:

    “Meanwhile, independent Sen. Bernie Sanders, who had a $7 million war chest, appears to have won every municipality in the state, although results are not yet in for Moretown from the Secretary of State’s office, according to David Healy of Stone Environmental.”

    As the dog would say: “Bark first, ask questions later.”

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Mapping the electorate: Town by town snapshot of red and blue voting ..."