Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

5 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Looking for the feds to solve this problem is like pushing on a rope. The federal budget is 33% underfunded. Looking to the feds is borrowing from China to help our neighbors. Did you notice that the feds didnt show up immediately after Irene? Did you notice that neighbors stepped up and helped neighbors? Do you think the feds buy local? The solution is decentralization. 200 years of centralization beyond any level of reasonableness has not been successful. Increased centralization will only prove to be less successful. Connect those in need with their neighbors, and you will create a sustainable solution. This networking and the relationships it builds will cure more than hunger. It will build commUNITY through loving service. Vermont’s slogan is Freedom and UNITY. I have fresh whole foods produced on my farm that I would be happy to give to any neighbor in need. EMPOWER NEIGHBORS TO HELP NEIGHBORS. I bet we could even reduce the carbon footprint by meeting these needs in this way. It would probably makes those receiving foods feel better if they could work for food, but I am not sure we have the FREEDOM to do that without subscribing to the bureaucracy and somebody paying taxes on such activity, Oh no! I wonder if the only way to legally do this is to donate commercially canned goods to a non-profit like the Food Shelf, and for being such a good citizen you may get a tax break, if you are wealthy enough. And, since the US gave you that tax break, they don’t have enough money to fund the food shelf.

  2. I agree with Dexter. I do not see many individuals in our country going hungry and in fact I have seen some who are obese buy groceries with food stamps and then climb in a new Hummer and drive home.

    We are 16+ Trillion in debt and many already get food stamps and on top of that we have TEFAP funding, etc. Kind of sounds like double dipping and too many government programs for similar purpose with too many entities sticking fingers in the money pie. So if we combined all the various programs into one I wonder just exactly how much money we are actually spending?

    This should be handled by local communities and there would be more money available, because you would eliminate all those at the federal level getting paid big bucks at the expense of those supposedly going hungry. All those salaries to make Citizens dependant on government handouts sure could buy alot of food.

    1. Janet, you might want to spend some time as one of those neighbors, volunteering at your local food pantry. This is a complex issue and little understood otherwise.

  3. A difference between Democrates and Republicans has always been one of philosophy. What is the good of government.

    The republican want capitalism without restraint, does not believe we all are here with equal basic rights and some of these include housing, food, warmth in winter, health care and right to education to the extent our abilities or desire requires. In other words they reject an equal and just society and revert to a more Darwian survivor and winners take all world view.

    So to this extent, do most nations, except the more mature and socialized countries especially in Europe.

    When will America ever join the human race of peace and charity? I am sorry to say not in my life time/

  4. Just imagine how much worse this would get under the Romney/Ryan “everyone for themselves” ticket….whether it is 47% or 30% who don’t count, hungry people are in both those numbers.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Emergency food programs in Vermont struggle with reduced federal supp..."