Vermonters are certainly generous in food drives. But that won’t be enough to compensate for a 1.2 million pound drop in food donations statewide, warned Vermont Foodbank Director John Sayles at a press conference headlined by U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders on Tuesday.
“I’m becoming intolerant of hunger and how we can let it happen,” Sayles said.
The main cause of the drop is a 50 percent reduction in Vermont’s allotment from the federal Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), which provides food at no cost through groups like the Foodbank. Sanders called it “simply unacceptable” that Vermont children go to bed hungry, and “unconscionable that the federal government would cut back on food and nutrition assistance to states as our nation struggles to recover from the worst recession since the Great Depression.”
The media briefing on hunger programs was held at the Chittenden Emergency Food Shelf in Burlington’s Old North End, and attended by around a dozen local residents.
The county’s food shelf relies on TEFAP to meet the needs of more than 12,000 people.
“We are seeing more working families in need at a time when our food donations this past year were down 500,000 pounds from the previous year,” according to director Rob Meehan, who suggested holding the press conference.
Food shelves, and other programs are seeing a record demand, but the “charitable food system is working with fewer and fewer resources,” according to a press release issued by the Vermont Foodbank. Part of the reason for the reduction in TEFAP is that the U.S. Department of Agriculture has not needed to purchase as much food to support various markets.
More cuts may be on the way, added Sanders. The Senate has voted to increase TEFAP spending by $50 million, but House Republicans are blocking extension of the Farm Bill, Sanders said. The 2008 legislation funds TEFAP and other food assistance programs, including Food Stamps, the Commodity Supplement Food Program, the School Lunch Program and Summer Food Service Program. The House version of the bill includes deep cuts to food stamps.
The Vermont Foodbank works with 280 food shelves, meal sites, shelters, senior centers and after-school programs across the state. Donations allow them to purchase food by the truckload at wholesale prices. “Purchased food allows the charitable food network to replace the lost USDA foods with what the network needs, when they need it,” Sayles explained.
More than 8 million pounds of “quality food” is distributed by the Foodbank annually. But at least a quarter of that comes from TEFAP.
The TEFAP reduction is having a ripple effect. “Many of our partners are struggling to keep food on their shelves while providing for those in need walking through their doors,” Sayles said. “While grocers, food manufacturers and financial donors have been generous, the Foodbank still struggles to fill the void of the 1.2 million pounds of food that we were counting on.”
Due to the “awful recession we are dealing with, millions of Americans have slipped out of the middle class and into poverty,” Sanders said. “Many of them, including seniors and children, struggle daily to put food on their table.” He pointed to a recent AARP study that says about nine million Americans 50 or older risk going to bed hungry, a 79 percent increase in the last decade.
“We have a tendency to forget this is a huge economic downturn,” Sanders said.
Asked why the emergency food problem is getting worse even though the economy appears to be improving overall, Sayles replied that food banks cannot solve the problem of hunger on their own.
“They’re not magicians,” added Sanders. “As a nation we may be making a slow recovery but millions remain at the bottom of the economic ladder and are really hurting.”
Hunger is at an all-time high in the U.S., Sanders said. One out of seven people – almost 45 million – receive food stamps. In Vermont, more than one in eight households do not have enough money to fully meet their food needs at all times, according to Hunger Free Vermont.
It’s not just seniors and children, Sanders added. “What emergency food shelves around the state tell me is that people who are working full time, but who earn low wages, are simply having a difficult time paying their rent, putting $4 a gallon gas into their car, heating their homes, paying their light bills, paying for health care – and then having enough money left over to pay for food,” Sanders said in a prepared statement.
The ultimate solution is, “at all levels, we’ve all got to say, nobody goes hungry,” Sanders concluded. For five years he and other senators have urged the U.S. Department of Agriculture to increase TEFAP funding. But while mandatory spending for Farm Bill programs has risen as needs have grown, discretionary funding has been reduced.
Congress has agreed to maintain $3.47 billion in funding for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), which helps eligible households pay for winter energy service. Although the same amount as last year, the amount is a decline from the $4.7 billion approved for FY 2011. Sanders warned that some GOP leaders want to cut back further.
“At a time when the gap between the very rich and everybody else is growing wider, we cannot turn our backs on those Vermonters and Americans most in need,” Sanders argued. He pledged to “do my best in the lame duck” congressional session after the November elections to reverse the trend and adequately fund nutrition programs.
“Most people believe that we don’t want to see our neighbors go hungry,” he said.
Asked by a local activist what individuals can do, Sayles advised people to stand up and talk openly about the problem. “Let people know you will not tolerate hunger in Vermont.”























Permalink |
Looking for the feds to solve this problem is like pushing on a rope. The federal budget is 33% underfunded. Looking to the feds is borrowing from China to help our neighbors. Did you notice that the feds didnt show up immediately after Irene? Did you notice that neighbors stepped up and helped neighbors? Do you think the feds buy local? The solution is decentralization. 200 years of centralization beyond any level of reasonableness has not been successful. Increased centralization will only prove to be less successful. Connect those in need with their neighbors, and you will create a sustainable solution. This networking and the relationships it builds will cure more than hunger. It will build commUNITY through loving service. Vermont’s slogan is Freedom and UNITY. I have fresh whole foods produced on my farm that I would be happy to give to any neighbor in need. EMPOWER NEIGHBORS TO HELP NEIGHBORS. I bet we could even reduce the carbon footprint by meeting these needs in this way. It would probably makes those receiving foods feel better if they could work for food, but I am not sure we have the FREEDOM to do that without subscribing to the bureaucracy and somebody paying taxes on such activity, Oh no! I wonder if the only way to legally do this is to donate commercially canned goods to a non-profit like the Food Shelf, and for being such a good citizen you may get a tax break, if you are wealthy enough. And, since the US gave you that tax break, they don’t have enough money to fund the food shelf.
Permalink |
I agree with Dexter. I do not see many individuals in our country going hungry and in fact I have seen some who are obese buy groceries with food stamps and then climb in a new Hummer and drive home.
We are 16+ Trillion in debt and many already get food stamps and on top of that we have TEFAP funding, etc. Kind of sounds like double dipping and too many government programs for similar purpose with too many entities sticking fingers in the money pie. So if we combined all the various programs into one I wonder just exactly how much money we are actually spending?
This should be handled by local communities and there would be more money available, because you would eliminate all those at the federal level getting paid big bucks at the expense of those supposedly going hungry. All those salaries to make Citizens dependant on government handouts sure could buy alot of food.
Permalink |
Janet, you might want to spend some time as one of those neighbors, volunteering at your local food pantry. This is a complex issue and little understood otherwise.
Permalink |
A difference between Democrates and Republicans has always been one of philosophy. What is the good of government.
The republican want capitalism without restraint, does not believe we all are here with equal basic rights and some of these include housing, food, warmth in winter, health care and right to education to the extent our abilities or desire requires. In other words they reject an equal and just society and revert to a more Darwian survivor and winners take all world view.
So to this extent, do most nations, except the more mature and socialized countries especially in Europe.
When will America ever join the human race of peace and charity? I am sorry to say not in my life time/
Permalink |
Just imagine how much worse this would get under the Romney/Ryan “everyone for themselves” ticket….whether it is 47% or 30% who don’t count, hungry people are in both those numbers.