Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

5 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. It seems the Rove/Romney camp carefully considered the George Lakoff messaging play book, and, carefully choosing their words, successfully feigned morality, common purpose and vision, while the Dems (whom we thought might have actually had some) ignored it. Oh well. I guess they think they know better.

    1. Actually, Sally, the GOP tends to channel pollster Frank Luntz, who popularized the term “death tax” that has gained so much traction. George Lakoff, who is a linguist, tends to advise Democrats, who often don’t take his advice.

      By the way, back years ago, I once worked with a very young, callow Karl Rove, who was then in the early stages of perfecting his dark arts. Please don’t hold that against me.

  2. Obama looked asleep at the wheel and permitted Romney to take one more side on health care and other issues. Had Obama been awake and alert, he could have pointed out two things:
    1. Whoever was in that room with him and Lehrer was not the Romney of the Republican primaries or the stump speeches with Paul Ryan, because the words and the messages were entirely different from what Romney serves up to the Republicans who come to listen to him. His pronouncements were the rankest type of pandering one might imagine.
    2. One can document so many contradictory Romney pronouncements on health care (Republican primaries, stump speeches, Sixty Minutes interview, Meet the Press interview)and the debate, that if Romney were a pancake, he’d be an exceptional one, because he’d be well done on five sides.

  3. And the next day, the chattering class was talking about Big Bird and dissecting Romney’s lies more than anything else. And there are two debates left, neither of which fall on the President’s 20th wedding anniversary. If your wife looked that hot after 20 years married, you might be a little worn out on your 20th anniversary too. I think Bill Maher has that right.

  4. I for one am disappointed in Senator Sanders’ choice of words. In no way do I see nor do miillions of Americans see former Governor Romney as an “extremist”. Would our Senator welcome a reciprocal tag as a “left wing extremist”. Maybe we could lose such labels altogether and instead debate the individual issues, policies etc. that would be part of a healthy democracy.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Sanders pans president’s debate performance"