Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

4 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. So according to Giambiatista ( who speaks for a very quiet Pearce) is asking Wilton, who has no relationship with the Superpac to disclose ITS DONORS and take down the ad she’s not running???

    Amateur hour at team Pearce.

  2. ” He criticized “super majority single party rule” under the Democrats.”

    I am sure that if it were Republican single party rule this man would not criticize it. Also, it is what the voters wanted. He can criticize it for all he wants, but it is what the voters wanted.

  3. Mr.Brooks,perhaps the Democrats wouldn’t have a “super majority” if the Republicans weren’t so reactionary concerning any progressive legislation! The seem to continually be on the the wrong side of the issues. If the late Richard Snelling were in politics today, he probably wouldn’t recognize his own party.

  4. Negative Super PAC ads might work in other states. But if Vermont has the above-average education system that is touted, then I would “hope” that people will listen instead to the debates.

    Also, I would “hope” that folks follow the record of candidates before they seek higher office. That is what VTDigger provides: information about the elected officials while they are in office, and not just when on the campaign trail.

    That said, this is more challenging in the Governor’s race this year, since while Super PAC money flows into Vermont, there will be fewer debates this time around.

    Plus our media today is very fragmented, so a lot of this Super PAC money will be wasted anyways. For Internet-only political ads, there is still the challenge to get someone to click the “Play button” on the browser video plugin, assuming they got to the webpage in the first place.

    As for TV ads, some TV stations are part Burlington, part Plattsburgh, NY, as far as audience and broadcast license. Other TV stations are part Vermont and part New Hampshire as far as audience and license. So again, a lot of leakage and wasted advertising spending over the borders to NY and NH.

    So much for “Fiscal Conservative” spending on negative political ads in Vermont!

    If you watch C-SPAN, VPT, VPR and read VTDigger, you can hear the speeches unedited, see/hear the full debates, see the full conventions, and avoid the Super PAC ads for the most part (unless that is the specific topic being discussed).

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Democrats galled by GOP Super PAC spending on Wilton and Illuzzi"