Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

8 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. You would think that a candidate for Attorney General would be a member of the Vermont Bar.
    Even Fred Tuttle would know that.

  2. Actually, a law degree is not a requirement for the position of Attorney General. Isn’t that odd? But it isn’t.

    1. But it isn’t a question of “requirements”. It’s a question of whose best qualified. Is that the guy who moved to Vermont specifically to run for office, who has not passed the state bar? No. I don’t think so.

  3. I’m a long term, about 45 years,independent who lately has voted more Democrat than Republican. Where did real Republican candidates like Jeffords, Snelling and Akins go to?

    So It was nice to have a chance to have two viable candidate to vote for, even though it was only the primaries.

    Now we’re back to one viable candidate, Bill Sorrell. The only thing noteworthy about Jack McMullen is that he was trounced by old Fred “Man with a Plan” Tuttle.

  4. Jack, can you be more specific about your two tiered vision?

    First, please define exactly what you mean by “non-violent” offender. Do you mean someone with a non-violent conviction or someone convicted with no violent BEHAVIOR? Big difference Jack. As you should know, lawyers love to plea bargain.

    EXAMPLE #1: A real drug dealer, in business selling drugs, goes to court and pleads guilty to POSSESSION of drugs. On paper, he now looks like a addict who needs….. treatment. In reality he is a drug DEALER that should have got more than the 60 days you complain he received. He won’t do well in treatment because he is a criminal that got a break from an overworked criminal justice system.

    EXAMPLE #2: A person beats and robs someone. During the court process he eventually pleads guilty to UNLAWFUL MISCHIEF or some other misdemeanor that doesn’t sound violent. Maybe he gets a short stay from the judge for punishment. The state agrees to lower the ASSAULT and ROBBERY in exchange for a guilty plea. On paper, he looks like a non-violent offender. His BEHAVIOR was however, violent.

    The real world is far different from what statistical analysts might show us in a bar graph. If you really think there are people in jail right now who should not be there, please, let everyone know who they are. I think you’ll find 99.9% of inmates are in prison for a good reason, if you look at BEHAVIOR.

  5. Thank you, Mr. Bellini,

    Those distinctions are important and often left out of the discussion.

  6. Mr. Bellini skirts around the issue of drugs: we — both Vermont and wider government — have criminalized behavior which is primarily damaging to the drug user. While in prison, drug users learn a great deal about criminal activity. The whole connection between drug use and criminality needs to be opened and debated. Drug users are clogging the system, but the results are very weak. Mr. MacMullen has very interesting perspective, if you will not be afraid of him.

    1. I’m surprised to hear the CEO of the conservative Ethan Allen Institute suddenly concerned that our prisons are filled with people that should not be there. The “connection between drug use and criminality…” How about murder, armed robbery, burglery, murder for hire, child abuse and neglect, to name a few. Does Mr. McMullen really believe that first time, non-violent(behavior)drug possession convictions are clogging up Vermont prisons?

      Could Mr. McMullen provide some proof? Do the courts really have it all wrong?

      Let Mr. McMullen provide some proof, if he can. And answer for himself, if he can.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "GOP candidate for Vermont attorney general picks up familiar refrain ..."