Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

8 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. People should be asking why is the Democratic Party taking sides in a primary election?

    1. They aren’t. Party endorsement is acknowledgment that a candidate is a genuine representative of the party. That translates to support in a general election, not in a primary among endorsed candidates. Sorrel will also be endorsed by the party.

      1. Sorry: the correct spelling is Sorrell.

  2. Two comments on the AG poll:

    1. Early-season primary polls are more a test of name recognition than anything else. Actual primary results can be very different from polls taken several months before. Two years ago, Deb Markowitz was leading the Democratic gubernatorial primary in polls taken in June.

    2. 65.6% of those polled said they were “very likely” to vote in the August primary election. This number seems very high to me. Based on previous years’ primary turnouts, I would guess that 30,000 to 40,000 people will vote in this year’s Democratic primary and 25,000 in the Republican primary. That would represent a turnout of well under 20% of the state’s registered voters. Even if Donovan and Sorrell, plus competitive legislative primaries in some districts, could boost Democratic turnout to 50,000, we’re still looking at a relatively low-turnout election.

  3. Why didn’t WCAX poll Shumlin/Brock?

  4. Mr. Donovan made a very clear statement that he does not support law enforcement’s request for warrant-less searches of the prescription drug database- he wants investigators to obtain a warrant. I think that is probably a very solid, rational position for a prosecutor.

    Mr Sears was a strong advocate for warrant-less searches, saying it was a tool very much needed by investigators. He made his opposition to requiring warrant acquisition very clear, pointing to it as a great roadblock to prescription drug abuse investigations. Now he is giving his endorsement to Mr. Donovan, stating that Mr. Donovan ‘has his priorities straight’ in respect to the prescription drug abuse problem.

    This may be an example of speaking out of both sides of one’s mouth, having cake and eating it too, or all that and more. The fun just never ends….

    1. Very accute observation Luci.

      I too noticed this. I also spoke to TJ personally about the police trying to circumvent the fourth amendment by misinforming the public about “Epidemics” with this proposed legislation. He seemed unaware that the police were actually trying to “Warrantlessly” access federally protected HIPPA information without having to establish Probably Cause. I did my best to make sure he understood this. He agreed that the police should have a warrant for this.

      If you look at the Vermont Crime On-Line lists of drug offenses you’ll see that the lion’s share (by far & wide) is Marijuana related. Its like 2,200 Marijuana offenses out of 2,450 total for 2009.

      Maybe the police are trying to get ready for the decrimalization of Marajuana by ramping up legislation for more “Drug Wars?”

      “Fighting Crime” is big busines and if we have less crime, we’ll have less job security for juges, prosecutors, police and correctional staff.

      We need to feed the system from the back end and not the front end.

      Its like Burlington Police Chief Michael Schirling said, We need “Back-based preventative” and NOT “Front-based responsive.”

      I’m not sure what to make of Mr. Sears.

  5. While I am tempted to support Donovan, Sen. Sears endorsement turns me off. I attended several Senate votes/debates this past session and saw that Sears is just a big bully. I cant stand him and his endorsement is almost enough to turn me off. But I do think that maybe it is time for someone new, so most likely I will vote for Donovan in the primary. Personally, I think it is time to get rid of Sen. Sears.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Trail Tidbits: Poll shows Sorrell would beat Donovan two-to-one; Sorr..."