Insurance companies will likely see belt tightening under reform

Anya Rader Wallack speaking to reporters on Tuesday. VTD/Josh Larkin

Anya Rader Wallack. VTD file photo/Josh Larkin

An order this month by the state’s board in charge of health care reform indicates to insurance companies that they will have to rein in costs, or at least be more specific about where their customers’ money is going.

Earlier this month, the Green Mountain Care Board, appointed by Gov. Peter Shumlin to oversee health care reform efforts, approved a 2.9-percent increase in “administrative costs” for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont.

But it did so with some reservations — including concerns that the company was paying its employees more and offering bonuses at a time when many Vermonters are seeing their increased health insurance costs outpace their wages.

“Our review shows that the company’s 2012 administrative expense budget is more than 9% higher than its actual 2011 administrative expenses, and includes budgeting for employee wage increases and bonuses at a time when most Vermonters are not seeing similar, if any, increases in income,” the board’s order reads.

Anya Rader Wallack, the chair of the Green Mountain Care Board, said the board will be looking at all sorts of ways to control the constantly rising cost of health care as the state aims to implement a universal health care system by 2017.

“What you can expect to see is that we the board are going to take a hard look at all costs in the system as we implement our responsibility to try to make health care as affordable as possible,” Wallack said.

Under the federal Affordable Care Act, insurance companies are already required to spend the majority of their money on health care through what is called a medical loss ratio.

Wallack said Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont consistently meets this requirement, but the state is looking at all potential places where it can contain spending. Administrative expenses like employee bonuses for health insurance companies are just one example of those areas.

Wallack said that with the upward trend in health care costs, administrative costs have risen simultaneously.

Under H.559, which Gov. Peter Shumlin signed into law this week, the board will have 30 days instead of 10 to address rate increase requests by insurance companies once it receives a recommendation from the state Department of Financial Regulation (formerly known as the Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration).

BISHCA Commissioner Steve Kimbell. VTD/Josh Larkin

BISHCA Commissioner Steve Kimbell. VTD file photo/Josh Larkin

Steve Kimbell, commissioner of the Department of Financial Regulation, recommended approval of the rate increase for Blue Cross Blue Shield. He said the 2.9 percent increase is less than the company has been asking for in years past.

Kimbell said the rates of increasing health care costs, including administrative costs, are complex. Containing those costs may also be the linchpin of making health care reform affordable.

Under both federal and state health care reform laws, he said, insurance companies will likely see more scrutiny of their attempts to increase customer rates.

“It’s safe to assume that enhanced scrutiny of health insurance rate filings is one of the intents of the Affordable Care Act,” Kimbell said.

Kevin Goddard, vice president of external affairs and sales for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont, said the insurance company welcomes the longer time frame for looking at administrative expenses.

“In terms of administrative expenses, we have worked very, very hard to control and reduce our administrative expenses over time,” he said. “We are eager to have the Green Mountain Care Board have more time to look at it and hopefully agree with our point of view.”

Goddard said the company has been under its 5 percent growth target it set a few years ago.

He said the longer time period will also allow the company to clarify issues such as increased compensation. Goddard said the company’s budgeted employee compensation increase is actually lower than the 3.8 percent average wage increase statewide between 2010 and 2011. He said the company does not offer bonuses per se, but it does allow salary-based incentive programs for employees.

Alan Panebaker

Leave a Reply

15 Comments on "Insurance companies will likely see belt tightening under reform"

1000

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Rep. Bob Bouchard
4 years 4 months ago

It looks like Blue Cross Blue shield will be the only player
in the proposed health care exchange. It’s too bad that the exchange will not be opened up to the free market, where competition will assure that costs and expenses will be kept
at a minimum, if a company wants to do business. The free market will always prevail in cost savings over a one
company monopoly, or single payer system.

walter carpenter
4 years 4 months ago
“The free market will always prevail in cost savings over a one company monopoly, or single payer system.” If this were true then why do nations with single-payer systems (which is all the democratic/industrial/technological nations except us) have far lower costs and far better results than we do with our free-market and hodge podge system? If this were true, then why do we have the highest paid health insurance CEO’s in the world, with some 50 million Americans unable to get health insurance because it is too expensive — a problem that is unknown in the rest of the democratic… Read more »
Jeanne Keller
4 years 4 months ago
Walt: I’ll add my voice to those asking you to please quit your misinformation about single payers. Not all democratic/industrial/technological nations have SINGLE payers.In fact, only three that I can think of have single payers – Canada, Taiwan and UK. The others have centrally regulated financial management, but they do not all have single payers. Examples of regulated multi-payer systems include: Germany, France, Japan, Switzerland, Belgium, Netherlands — need I go on to make my point? However, those countries do not have a rampant free market approach,either. The payers are treated more the way we in the USA treat energy… Read more »
Craig Powers
4 years 4 months ago

If you want health care reform to move forward then open your mind up to the possibility of systems other than “single payer”. The constant drone from the zealots that single payer is the only way does nothing to advance the cause of health care reform. There clearly is enough info available to see that single payer is financially unsustainable and has its own set of problems.

Dan McCauliffe
4 years 4 months ago
Walter, You continue to confuse single payer health care systems with systems that offer universal health care access. Most “democratic/industrial/technological nations”, to use your terms, do not have single-payer health care systems like Canada, UK and Taiwan. Most of these countries have a mixture of payers including employer sponsored insurance, patient purchased insurance, self payments/co-payments, and government payments and subsides for the elderly and poor, much like the US. In some countries like France, the government through taxation, covers most of the health care costs, while in other countries like Singapore, the government only pays a small fraction of total… Read more »
Bob Zeliff
4 years 4 months ago
It is sort of humous to hear so many apply the tired, but incorrect, dogma that the current US health care system is a “free market”. Who among us has shopped for a Doctor on his performance and his costs? Who amount us has shopped for a hospital based on performance and cost? When you are diagnosed with Cancer, do you shop for your care? If we as individual do not do this we do NOT have a “free market” in health care. Let us remember in the early 60s Canada’s and the US’s health systems and cost were essentially… Read more »
Lee Russ
4 years 4 months ago
For what it’s worth–health care financing in France: 1. About seventy five percent of the total health expenditures are covered by the public health insurance system. A part of the balance is paid directly by the patients and the other part by private health insurance companies that are hired individually or in group (assurance complémentaire or mutuelle, complementary insurance or mutual fund). Medical News Today, 6/8/09; http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/9994.php 2. “A study I would take more seriously is one published last year by Ellen Nolte and Martin McKee in the journal Health Affairs. They examined avoidable mortality — that is, deaths whose… Read more »
Ann Raynolds
4 years 4 months ago
I second Mr. Carpenter’s analysis of our “free market” for-profit national health insurance system. If the National Health Insurance Companies really cared either about providing health care or if they really cared to compete, we would see a very different picture. In Germany the health care system is managed through insurance companies but with governement regulations which not one big Health Insurance Comapny here would tolerate. People make a living there, they don’t make fortunes. To remind anyone who has forgotten, here are some of your Health Insurance Companies’ CEO salaries in 2009 provided by the Wall St. Journal: AETNA… Read more »
Lee Russ
4 years 4 months ago
On CEO salaries, you can add the head of little MVP here in Vermont and New York–more than $1 million in each of 2010 and 2011. That’s while the company is laying off people. In the Times Union, by the way, MVP claims the layoffs are due largely to falling profits, which are due largely to dwindling subscribers due at least in part to rising premium costs. The TU story appeared the very day that MVP sponsored health care reform forums in Bennington (free breakfast at Mt. Anthony Country Club) and Rutland (free lunch at one of the hotels). Dr.… Read more »
4 years 4 months ago
The so-called “Free Market” mainly benefits the health insurance industry. To say that the free market, as Mr. Bouchard states, will always prevail in cost savings over “single payer” is ignoring the fact that here in the U.S. we spend approximately 18% of GDP on health care while the rest of the advanced countries (Single payer/Universal) spend about 9%. This still leaves us with 50 million uninsured and at least that many underinsured. As far as pure “single payer” goes, Dr. McCauliffe didn’t mention Japan and Australia who are in the top 10 when it comes to life expectancy while… Read more »
Craig Powers
4 years 4 months ago
“But many health-care economists say Japan’s low-cost system is probably not sustainable without significant change.” Washington Post. “To keep costs down, Japan has made tradeoffs in other areas — sometimes to the detriment of patients. Some are merely irritating, such as routine hour-long waits before doctor appointments. But others involve worrisome questions about quality control and gaps in treatment for urgent care. “Japanese hospitals experience a “crowding out” effect, with space for emergency care and serious medical conditions sometimes overwhelmed by a flood of patients seeking routine treatment, said Naohiro Yashiro, a professor of economics and health-care expert at International… Read more »
Lee Russ
4 years 4 months ago
“Japan has about the lowest per capita health care costs among the advanced nations of the world, and its population is the healthiest. That is largely due to lifestyle factors, such as low rates of obesity and violence, but the widespread availability of high-quality health care is also important. Everyone in Japan is covered by insurance for medical and dental care and drugs. People pay premiums proportional to their income to join the insurance pool determined by their place of work or residence. …. “Japan is egalitarian and medical bankruptcy is unknown. An individual’s income influences the quantity and quality… Read more »
4 years 4 months ago

No one said the Japanese or any any other system is perfect! However compared to ours, Japan’s results are better at about half the cost. Many in this country can’t afford to seek treatment due to high deductibles and/or lack of coverage. Moreover the Japanese, Australians,Canadians, etc.etc. never face “medical uninsurability,” “medical bankruptcy,” and dependence on their employer for coverage.

Walter Carpenter
4 years 4 months ago
“I’ll add my voice to those asking you to please quit your misinformation about single payers.” Jeanne. Thanks for your post. I did say “systems,” rather than system. Like yourself and a good many on here, I have studied these “systems” before. I have even lived in one. Whether it is a more or less pure single-payer, such as Britain, Canada (or our Medicare), or a public-private hybrid like France, Germany, Switzerland, Taiwan, or others it is a still a single-payer type system. We can discuss the semantics of this for the next thousand years and it will still be… Read more »
Rep. Bob Bouchard
4 years 4 months ago
So, the question is, what are we doing in little ole Vermont. We are creating an exchange that will feature 1 company to shop from. Already you can see from the article above that the Green Mountain Care board is trying to manage them. What I am saying is that if we have an exchange system, would it not be best to have some choices? I would understand that the rules have to be set in place, such as everyone has to be covered, no prior existing conditions exemptions, and so on. If we are a retail store with no… Read more »
wpDiscuz
Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Insurance companies will likely see belt tightening under reform"