“Citizenship Not Partisanship,” or a Partisan Citizen?

For immediate release
January 20, 2012

Alicia D’Alessandro
Vermont Democratic Party

Montpelier, VT — Yesterday in the Vermont House of Representatives, Kurt Wright voted “no” on the Budget Adjustment Act related to the FY 2012 budget. Wright followed 41 of his 43 GOP colleagues in casting his party-line vote against critical funding for social work, substance abuse intervention, law enforcement and refugee resettlement initiatives that are critical to the well-being of Burlington and in line with Burlington values.

“Kurt Wright’s mayoral campaign slogan is ‘Citizenship not Partisanship,’ but in reality, this citizen says one thing in Burlington and then votes as a partisan in Montpelier,” stated Burlington resident Jake Perkinson, Chairman of the Vermont Democratic Party and former Chairman of both the Burlington City Democratic Committee and the Chittenden County Democratic Party. “This is yet one more example that Wright is not a leader, but simply a career politician who goes along toget along. When he is in Montpelier among his Republican Party cohorts, he has shown that he will vote the partyline whether or not it is good for Burlington.”

Initiatives in the Act, which Wright voted to kill, include:
Nine new Department for Children and Families social workers that will reduce the caseload for overloaded social workers to better help vulnerable families;
A $14,000 increase in federal funds to assist the refugee population;
New Department of Vermont Health Access positions, 11 of which will specifically help manage the toughest cases for better outcomes, particularly in substance abuse and inpatient care, and save Vermont more than $4 million per year;
A new assistant for rapid arraignment in the Chittenden County State’s Attorney’s Office;
A Global Commitment Fund pass-through that will provide the University of Vermont and Fletcher Allen Health Care $30 millionfor graduate medical education; and
Two public safety positions that will enhance certificationof breathalyzer and blood alcohol tests, allowing law enforcement to have the evidence necessary to win DUI cases.

The entire budget adjustment resulted in a decrease in the FY2012 General Fund budget of approximately $220,000. “And yet, even where good program initiatives will result in financial savings and tremendous social benefits, Kurt Wright followed the obstructionist game plan of his Republican Party that is cynically applied in Washington D.C., throughout the country and now at home in Vermont” stated Chairman Perkinson. “This is a partisan vote that will hurt the City of Burlington and reflects the true Kurt Wright who is unwilling to stand up for Burlington unless it advances his own political ambition.”

“The citizens of Burlington count on us to represent their best interests in Montpelier,” stated Representative Kesha Ram, who voted in favor of the Budget Adjustment Act. “By voting against these initiatives, Kurt once again has demonstrated that he is out of touch with Burlington values, choosing instead to vote his party line.”


Press Release


  1. Linda Waite-Simpson :

    Except he voted ‘yes’ on the budget adjustment bill.

  2. Dave Bellini :

    Vermont Democratic Chair should not throw stones at other politicians for being too partisan. The VDP chair quashed a pro labor resolution in Barre that had overwhelming support. The VDP chair used his position to drown out any whiff of internal criticism. I’ll be kind and say that under the circumstances, the press release could have been handled better.



Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "“Citizenship Not Partisanship,” or a Partisan Citizen?"