Montpelier 5/22/2012
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 22, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
72°/54°

Run of Site Leaderboard

youtube

4 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Maybe the 11.5% have chosen to embrace poverty. Are the Vermonters who take a vow of poverty included?

  2. When we discuss poverty, we should keep in mind the following Census Bureau statistics: nationally, at least, 35% of the poor are children; 8% are elderly (over 65) and 15% of those between 18 and 64 are disabled. In other words, these 3 classes account for just under 60% of the poor. Other than Ebenezer Scrooge and Newt Gingrich, few suggest that either children or the elderly should work; indeed, Gingrich notwithstanding, there are laws preventing children from working. Perhaps the disabled SHOULD work, but we have done a poor job as a society in facilitating that effort.

    It is also worth noting that 16% of the poor are foreign born, and very probably have linguistic barriers to decently-paid jobs.

    American political discourse discusses poverty almost entirely in the context of work, productivity, and economic participation, yet these statistics suggest that these issues are not relevant to the a large percentage of poor Americans.

  3. “The budget is a moral document,” argued Rabbi Joshua Chasen as the evening came to an end.

    There are three things wrong with this argument. First, I am puzzled as to where it says in scriptures that religious leaders have the moral duty to demand that others—not themselves—help the poor. It is not their money, and their sanctimoniousness about what “the rich” should pay is, in my view not in either the Christian or Jewish religious tradition. We have a personal moral duty to perform acts of charity, not demand that strangers we know nothing about be forced to do so.
    Second, the assumption that paying higher taxes will help the poor is a false assumption, and an example of the intellectual laziness sadly so prevelant among the clergy. For example, we have in St. Johnsbury what I call “ghost busses”–Bernie Sanders’ 21 bussess that he got his picture in the paper for, which travel ceaslessly around with their huge carbon footprint, and no one is on them. A small example, but why should the “rich” pay for such waste? Clergy should demand that we have efficient government that doesn’t award money for politicians pet projects like $500 million for Solyndra before they start demanding others pay for such waste.
    Third, most children who are in poverty come from single parent homes. If the clergy stopped telling others what to do with their money, and did their job of providing moral guidance to families so they would more likely stay together, poverty would decrease.

  4. A way to reduce CO2 AND tax people who use excessive electricity is to change the electric rates.
    Any household consuming less than 500 kWh per month pays no tax, between 500 and 600 kWh, a 10% tax; between 600 and 700 kWh, a 20% tax; between 700 and 800 kWh, a 30% tax, etc., until people wake up and install dimming switches, efficient light bulbs, efficient appliances and PV solar systems.
    The state will collect taxes to finance its social programs and less CO2 will be emitted.
    After a short while, Vermont would not need Efficiency Vermont anymore, thus freeing up another $40 million/yr to help the suffering middle class.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Religious alliance presses pols to tax wealthy Vermonters"