Montpelier 5/22/2012
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 22, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
72°/54°

Run of Site Leaderboard

youtube

6 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Ashe should go to the Progressive Caucus, where he belongs.

  2. Isn’t it a bit rich for the Progressive party Vice-chair to speak about a “lack of class” or an “unwelcome intrusion” for the Democrats to schedule their caucus the same day as the Progressives. If anything it’d force the Progressives to be a little honest of who they’re really supporting. Why hasn’t anyone stepped up in their own party for the nomination? It’d be generous to say that 25% of Ashe’s supporters were Democrats the day of the Democratic caucus. Most of Tim’s supporters were from the Progressive camp on November 13th yet somehow that’s okay with Mr. Bergman. Consistency counts Mr. Bergman.

  3. 1) I’ve always found it strange and somewhat alarming that an individual becomes the head of a political party by virtue of the public office that individual was elected to.

    2) On the original day of the Burlington Democratic caucus they would have allowed folks to vote if they showed up late, no? So why has “late” become persona-non-grata all of a sudden?

    3) If the Vermont Progressive Party is still intent on fusing with the Vermont Democratic Party, why don’t they just get it over with instead of playing pretend third party?

  4. I’d like to hear a single reason why any Progressive should care when the Democratic Party caucus is held.

  5. “2) On the original day of the Burlington Democratic caucus they would have allowed folks to vote if they showed up late, no? So why has “late” become persona-non-grata all of a sudden?”

    Mr. Schneider, I think if you’d read the several articles on that caucus, you’d know that they DIDN’T allow people who showed up late into the caucus.

    1. Never read that, wasn’t following Burlington’s inner workings all that closely (I’m from Williamstown in central Vermont).

      Thanks for the correction.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Doubts about fusion simmer in Burlington mayor’s race"