Montpelier 5/22/2012
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 22, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
72°/54°

Run of Site Leaderboard

facebook

11 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Are all those 1,496 Waterbury state employees necessary? Couldn’t there be a little triage and trim our rather overweight government?

    And should the Waterbury state complex be sold to a private developer for affordable housing or a new city center? Would this benefit Waterbury in the long term?

    1. Perhaps Mr. Miller can tell us exactly which state employees are unnecessary and which of their services we don’t need.

      1. We could start with whoever plows the road in front of his house or business

  2. I pnce saw one leaning on a shovel while I was driving past a work zone, so that means they’re all worthless and should be fired. Oh, wait, that worker was contracted by the state? In that case, fire the state workers anyway.

  3. I’m not sure we need ANR anymore, since the Agency is now letting developers write the permits and not having their staff scientists testify in technical cases.

    The Waterbury complex is a beautiful historic building that could be used for something like MassMOCA. With creative minds and some visionary entrepreneurs there can be a bright future for Waterbury’s economic vitality.

  4. I’m disappointed to read a comment suggesting more cuts to state employees. Easy to blurt out, harder to identify what part of government they wish to eliminate. State employees have been cut. Hundreds of positions have been eliminated. Cuts make some programs more symbolic than substantive. State employees VOLUNTARILY took a 3% pay cut and a freeze on all step increases for two years. In addition, state employees agreed to pay more towards retirement. Yet, state workers continue to be denigrated publicly as unnecessary and overpaid. How many state employees currently receive some form of public assistance? You probably won’t see that data published.

  5. Doug Hoffer,

    I submit the following: Vermont DLC. In their own words, “The Department of Liquor Control purchases, distributes, and sells distilled spirits through its agency stores…” This they say is an “integral” part of their mission.

    Response please…

    1. I’m not really sure what the Department of Liquor Control has to do with this article. I also found this statement from the DLC that explains that part of their mission that your reference.

      “Over six decades have demonstrated clearly that control states consistently show lower rates of alcohol-related crime and health problems, and violations of alcohol-related laws, than do their neighboring “open states”. The Department of Liquor Control operates the sale of liquor through a warehouse located in Montpelier, and over 70 contracted liquor agencies around the state. In cooperation with with both the liquor industry and State law enforcement, the retail section provides spirituous liquor at reasonable prices to responsible customers statewide.”

    2. Thank you Mr. Pais

      Mr. Greene

      The DLC does not cost taxpayers anything. It is an enterprise fund which generates more revenue than it needs (a lot more) and remits those funds to the state treasury.

      What else have you got?

  6. The issues raised in the comments are secondary, as I see it. Right now, the asset (WSOC), and it is a considerable one, belongs to the state. I toured the buildings earlier this month and BGS and a swarm of contractors have done an amazing job of cleaning up. WSOC can assume a holding pattern without further damage while decisions are made. These buildings are all structurally sound and weather tight, and the complex is a remarkable facility for Central Vermont. That said, no one, not the state, the private sector, an educational or non profit entity, can justify the remaining investment needed to bring the buildings back to occupancy without having a strategy for dealing with a flood such as Irene produced. That is the primary issue. We all, as stakeholders in the state, own it, and we can’t even really sell it for value without knowing how this problem could be addressed. At the moment we have a huge opportunity- the place is largely vacant, and all kinds of positive improvements can be made to make it a great campus. We’ve already done some creative thinking on how this can happen. It is a great time to move forward on the WSOC. The RFI is just one step of many.

  7. Is there anyone that represents the Town of Waterbury on the Advisory Committee?

    It would be nice it this committee could have convened earlier since the longer the wait in Waterbury, the more difficult for their local businesses.

    Thanks,
    Sara

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Long wait for state employees to return to Waterbury office complex"
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/upwardly/public_html/vtdNewsMachine/wp-content/plugins/gravity-forms-custom-post-types/gfcptaddonbase.php on line 50