Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

6 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. The NCLB program is an unfunded mandate that is just plain silly. It ties the hands of the school and teachers. They are the pros and should be given the right to teach unencumbered by the Bush rules.

  2. I agree with Ms. Miller, These type of tests SHOULD NOT be the only gage for evaluating students. I strongly believe they should be banned.. I have seen too many teachers cheating on these tests and the stress factor is un…believe…able for students as well as teachers.

    I just dont think they are fair evaluations!!!

  3. Today’s most unrealistic comment: “The governor painted a picture of a superintendent electronically overseeing up to four school board meetings simultaneously without having to get into a car.” I would like to know what that statement is based on.

    Today’s comment most requiring a lucid, clear, concise answer: ‘“I think it’s really important that the secretary of education implement the policies the governor feels strongly about,” Shumlin said.’ Okay, I’ll bite Governor Shumlin – exactly WHY is it so important that our children’s education be turned over to you?

    As to working to have appropriate reading levels treated as a non-negotiable, early introduction to the workforce, and challenging internships – please visit the Williamstown School District. We are putting these and many other measures into practice. AND WE NEED THE INDIVIDUAL ATTENTION OF OUR SUPERINTENDENT TO SUCCEED AT THIS!

    Most, if not all, school districts seem to understand the tightening of financial resources. In response we are working hard to find the resources we need and putting those to work. What we do not need is breaking up our teams … because breaking up our teams makes it harder for our teachers and teachers’ aides to do their jobs … which means schools mired in poor or mediocre performance will continue to be mire in poor or mediocre performance … which means the sole reason for our public education system, a high quality educational experience for our state’s yout, will not be met.

    So here’s your path, Peter: help us find and remove barriers that keep us at the local district level from making use of resources many of us don’t even know exist yet. We’ll do the rest.

    Thank you.

  4. Thought expressed by the Governor that was most filled with irradiated waste product: education is about providing employees to the economy. Absolutely wrong. The economy is about providing for those who we educate and send on in life. If we do a proper job in preparing our state’s youth they will figure the economic thing out.

    Most part of the meeting most unreported in the above article: Shumlin pushes for full public school choice. Now THAT is a truly great idea, and I hope we run with it.

  5. GOVERNOR SHUMLIN (and yes, I’m shouting) …

    You are quoted above as stating “I think it’s really important that the secretary of education implement the policies the governor feels strongly about.”

    Today (08/16/2011) while you were on the Mark Johnson Show I asked you the same question, and you gave me a totally non-responsive answer.

    So I ask you again, Governor Shumlin – EXACTLY WHY IS IT SO IMPORTANT THAT OUR CHILDREN’S EDUCATION BE TURNED OVER TO YOU? AND WHAT WILL IMPROVE IN OUR CHILDRENS’ EDUCATION IF WE TURN THE SYSTEM OVER TO YOU?

  6. Thank you Rama for following up with the Governor to hold him accountable for his answers. As someone that spent over 10 years as a public school teacher, I see this Governor as a EDU-Poser. They pose as someone progressive and forward thinking, especially if it plays well politically..Full parental and student engagement (school choice) is what we need, but this roll out of his position deserves much scrutiny. I am aware that Secretary Spaulding has a history of sincere interest in the subject. This Governor is positioning for re-election. Watch him close. It is fascinating. The only other person this politically strategic is Bernie Sanders.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Story + video: Shumlin asks for No Child Left Behind waiver"