Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

4 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Excellent article, Deb — thank you. (2.5 *billion* per night?! Wow!)

    One tiny error: I think you meant to say that the impact of the loss of bats in Vermont cannot be *over*estimated.

  2. On a spring trip out west, we enjoyed watching the bats after dark as they went about their work catching insects. The National Park rangers we encountered during our stay devoted a lot of time to educating visitors about the virtues of bats and the need to protect them. Back east, I began noticing bat houses hanging from trees along roadways in Vermont, New York, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. Is this something homeowners here should pursur? I’d rather have the bats than the bugs.

  3. How many endangered bats is the Agency of Natural Resources going to “permit” to be taken by wind developers? Four per turbine per year? Isn’t the right number zero? And since it is the developers’ experts who hire the wildlife biologists to pick up the dead birds and bats, and they are known to underestimate the mortality rate, who is going to verify that more than 4 per turbine are not killed? The only responsible solution is to not give takings permits for wind turbines in Vermont. Or require that the turbines are turned off whenever the bats are out. And then the wind turbines are not economically viable. Time to get real.

  4. It is likely that the fungus is a manifestation of defective immune function, but as always our know-it-all
    professionals are intolerant of a new idea, touting them as crazy, without performing a literature search. Such abuse of power is rampant in Vermont, and corrupts any hope of clnical progress.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Markowitz: Bats now on endangered species list"