UPDATED: Town by town map of Vermont gubernatorial race results

Town by town map of gubernatorial race results, with 99 percent reporting. Graphic by David Healy

This map is based on final unofficial results from several media sources, with 99 percent of municipalities reporting. David Healy of Stone Environmental in Montpelier contributed the map to VTdigger.org.

Town by town map of the governor’s race results, with 99 percent of towns reporting. Graphic by David Healy

To see what VTdigger.org readers had to say about the candidates and election night, see our Live Blog.
For the most recent results for the races for Vermont lieutenant governor, secretary of state and auditor, click here and scroll down.

Leave a Reply

9 Comments on "UPDATED: Town by town map of Vermont gubernatorial race results"


Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
5 years 11 months ago

It would certainly be interesting to know what characteristics these tightly grouped demographics have in common, i.e., education, household income, age.

5 years 11 months ago

Doesn’t look like it’s income. Look, for example at Stratton and Stowe vs. Shelburne and Norwich. Or Winooski vs. Barre and Williamstown. It may represent something of a cultural divide, though, unfortunately. I feel sorry for those lone Shumlin supporters in Orwell!

Bob Stannard
5 years 11 months ago

Dorset supported Peter Shumlin. That is nothing shy of amazing.

Eric Davis
5 years 11 months ago
Thanks, David, for producing and posting this map. My guess is that education is the demographic variable most closely associated with vote choice in the gubernatorial election. The exit poll conducted by the major networks (869 Vermonters who voted in person on Tuesday) shows the following relationship between education and vote: High school graduate (22% of sample) Dubie 63 – Shumlin 31 Some college (22% of sample) Dubie 57 – Shumlin 40 College graduate (32% of sample) Shumlin 50 – Dubie 48 Postgraduate (22% of sample) Shumlin 76 – Dubie 23 Shumlin’s highest percentage in the state was in Norwich,… Read more »
Bill Morris
5 years 11 months ago

The spatial contiguity of the voting is telling as well. If demography had any big effect on this election, it means like-minded folks are pretty tightly clustered together. Except in Montgomery, anyway.

John Perry
5 years 11 months ago

Thanks, David, for putting the data in visual form. I can only hope that the representation of voters with brains (albeit not a 1-1 match with college and post grad schooling) continues.

Now I understand why Republicans are so adamant about destroying the public school system, doing away with student loans (except as a profit center for banks), and insisting on leaving all the children behind. It’s their base.

5 years 11 months ago

Mr. Davis – From where do these post grads and profs get most of their research funding?

David Jaqua
5 years 11 months ago

@John Perry,

As evidenced by these reactions at last weekend’s Restore Sanity rally, ignorant and superficial views and reactions show no partisan preference.

HT Art Woolf

Rick Rayfield
5 years 11 months ago

Caveat correlator. A constant reminder. Correlation is no proof of causation. And a corollary, lack of correlation is not proof of lack of causation. Further, squaring the correlation coefficient gives you a sense of the amount of variance accounted for. Correlation of .5 (usually viewed as strong) only accounts mathematically for 25% of variance. And even then, correlation is no proof of causation. This discussion is interesting, but fraught with many other variables- from issues (Yankee and abortion) to traditional party voting.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "UPDATED: Town by town map of Vermont gubernatorial race results"