<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Brien: 2005 leak not related to current tritium probe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vtdigger.org/2010/02/24/obrien-2005-leak-not-related-to-current-tritium-probe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vtdigger.org/2010/02/24/obrien-2005-leak-not-related-to-current-tritium-probe/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obrien-2005-leak-not-related-to-current-tritium-probe</link>
	<description>Independent, investigative news for Vermont</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: George Harvey</title>
		<link>http://vtdigger.org/2010/02/24/obrien-2005-leak-not-related-to-current-tritium-probe/#comment-7518</link>
		<dc:creator>George Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vtdigger.org/?p=4638#comment-7518</guid>
		<description>O&#039;Brien says the leaks are not related.  They must have happened at different plants run by different companies.
Uldis Vanags says the 2005 leak was not reportable.  So what would have happened if they had tried to report it?
It is the same plant, which is aging and decaying.  It is the same company that is running to failure.  It is the same management that bullies, lies, and now is trying to bribe us with a promise to provide really cheap power for a couple years (at the same price WEG is asking for some of its green power that VY people call so expensive).
If this is not stopped, it will not be because honest people, who are willing to work an honest day for an honest wage, have prevailed.  It will be because greed has overcome truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;Brien says the leaks are not related.  They must have happened at different plants run by different companies.<br />
Uldis Vanags says the 2005 leak was not reportable.  So what would have happened if they had tried to report it?<br />
It is the same plant, which is aging and decaying.  It is the same company that is running to failure.  It is the same management that bullies, lies, and now is trying to bribe us with a promise to provide really cheap power for a couple years (at the same price WEG is asking for some of its green power that VY people call so expensive).<br />
If this is not stopped, it will not be because honest people, who are willing to work an honest day for an honest wage, have prevailed.  It will be because greed has overcome truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Rosler &#124; World online health review</title>
		<link>http://vtdigger.org/2010/02/24/obrien-2005-leak-not-related-to-current-tritium-probe/#comment-7517</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Rosler &#124; World online health review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vtdigger.org/?p=4638#comment-7517</guid>
		<description>Brien: 2005 leak not related to current tritium probe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brien: 2005 leak not related to current tritium probe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

